Evaluation of Multi-Platform Mobile AR Frameworks for Roman Mosaic Augmentation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10316/86950 https://doi.org/Cardoso, J. C. S., & Belo, A. (2018). Evaluation of Multi-Platform Mobile AR Frameworks for Roman Mosaic Augmentation. In R. Sablatnig & M. Wimmer (Eds.), Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage. The Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/gch.20181348 https://doi.org/10.2312/gch.20181348 |
Resumo: | Augmented Reality (AR) development frameworks have different recognition performance on different kinds of target images. In this work, we studied AR frameworks applied in the context of outdoor Roman mosaic ruins with the final aim of developing a multi-platform mobile AR application. We started by analysing the documented features of existing frameworks to determine the feasible ones. This resulted in the selection of three frameworks: CraftAR, PixLive, and Wikitude. We then experimentally evaluated the performance of the target recognition features against real mosaics by measuring the recognition delay, minimum required target area, visual alignment and visual stability. Results indicate a good recognition rate for CraftAR and a poor recognition rate for Wikitude. CraftAR showed better recognition delay and visual stability, while PixLive showed better minimum required target area and visual alignment. |
id |
RCAP_e6567464e224a97d06991c5e70f0e861 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/86950 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of Multi-Platform Mobile AR Frameworks for Roman Mosaic AugmentationAugmented realityRoman mosaicEmpirical studyAugmented Reality (AR) development frameworks have different recognition performance on different kinds of target images. In this work, we studied AR frameworks applied in the context of outdoor Roman mosaic ruins with the final aim of developing a multi-platform mobile AR application. We started by analysing the documented features of existing frameworks to determine the feasible ones. This resulted in the selection of three frameworks: CraftAR, PixLive, and Wikitude. We then experimentally evaluated the performance of the target recognition features against real mosaics by measuring the recognition delay, minimum required target area, visual alignment and visual stability. Results indicate a good recognition rate for CraftAR and a poor recognition rate for Wikitude. CraftAR showed better recognition delay and visual stability, while PixLive showed better minimum required target area and visual alignment.The Eurographics Association2018info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/86950https://doi.org/Cardoso, J. C. S., & Belo, A. (2018). Evaluation of Multi-Platform Mobile AR Frameworks for Roman Mosaic Augmentation. In R. Sablatnig & M. Wimmer (Eds.), Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage. The Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/gch.20181348http://hdl.handle.net/10316/86950https://doi.org/10.2312/gch.20181348eng978-3-03868-057-42312-6124https://diglib.eg.org/handle/10.2312/gch20181348Cardoso, Jorge C. S.Belo, Andréinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2020-02-10T13:48:52ZPortal AgregadorONG |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of Multi-Platform Mobile AR Frameworks for Roman Mosaic Augmentation |
title |
Evaluation of Multi-Platform Mobile AR Frameworks for Roman Mosaic Augmentation |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of Multi-Platform Mobile AR Frameworks for Roman Mosaic Augmentation Cardoso, Jorge C. S. Augmented reality Roman mosaic Empirical study |
title_short |
Evaluation of Multi-Platform Mobile AR Frameworks for Roman Mosaic Augmentation |
title_full |
Evaluation of Multi-Platform Mobile AR Frameworks for Roman Mosaic Augmentation |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of Multi-Platform Mobile AR Frameworks for Roman Mosaic Augmentation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of Multi-Platform Mobile AR Frameworks for Roman Mosaic Augmentation |
title_sort |
Evaluation of Multi-Platform Mobile AR Frameworks for Roman Mosaic Augmentation |
author |
Cardoso, Jorge C. S. |
author_facet |
Cardoso, Jorge C. S. Belo, André |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Belo, André |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cardoso, Jorge C. S. Belo, André |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Augmented reality Roman mosaic Empirical study |
topic |
Augmented reality Roman mosaic Empirical study |
description |
Augmented Reality (AR) development frameworks have different recognition performance on different kinds of target images. In this work, we studied AR frameworks applied in the context of outdoor Roman mosaic ruins with the final aim of developing a multi-platform mobile AR application. We started by analysing the documented features of existing frameworks to determine the feasible ones. This resulted in the selection of three frameworks: CraftAR, PixLive, and Wikitude. We then experimentally evaluated the performance of the target recognition features against real mosaics by measuring the recognition delay, minimum required target area, visual alignment and visual stability. Results indicate a good recognition rate for CraftAR and a poor recognition rate for Wikitude. CraftAR showed better recognition delay and visual stability, while PixLive showed better minimum required target area and visual alignment. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/86950 https://doi.org/Cardoso, J. C. S., & Belo, A. (2018). Evaluation of Multi-Platform Mobile AR Frameworks for Roman Mosaic Augmentation. In R. Sablatnig & M. Wimmer (Eds.), Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage. The Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/gch.20181348 http://hdl.handle.net/10316/86950 https://doi.org/10.2312/gch.20181348 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/86950 https://doi.org/Cardoso, J. C. S., & Belo, A. (2018). Evaluation of Multi-Platform Mobile AR Frameworks for Roman Mosaic Augmentation. In R. Sablatnig & M. Wimmer (Eds.), Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage. The Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/gch.20181348 https://doi.org/10.2312/gch.20181348 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
978-3-03868-057-4 2312-6124 https://diglib.eg.org/handle/10.2312/gch20181348 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
The Eurographics Association |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
The Eurographics Association |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1777302732243206144 |