Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2019 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/28673 |
Summary: | The objective of the present study was to evaluate current legal framework in EU and China regarding the improvement restoration of freshwater ecosystems. This policy study combines 1) the information gathered through the compilation of scientific literature regarding restoration practices in Europe and China, 2) the results from a Worksop session held in Beijing (6th and 7th of February 2018) and 3) an online survey regarding the evaluation of restoration projects developed in Europe and China. The diverse array of legislative pieces and obligations is set for different types of environmental problems, which is probably also a reflection of the maturation status of implementation of the several legislative pieces. The main degradation driver for restoration in Europe was the over-utilization of water resources (21.0%) and in China it was water pollution (29.4%). Another interesting aspect is that hydro-morphology restoration (28.6%) is the main restoration measure applied in the European projects surveyed, as opposed to threats removal in China (30.8%). This is probably due to the different implementation drivers in Europe and China, since the Water Framework Directive calls for the need on hydro-morphologic restoration, and in China all the main restoration drivers (1. the Three red lines of Most Stringent Water Resources Management; 2. Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Water Pollution; and 3. the Law for Prevention and Control of Water Pollution) call for pollution control and removal. |
id |
RCAP_e7cffe39c6174678357eefc6c044e80f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/28673 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and ChinaRestorationfreshwaterrestorationThe objective of the present study was to evaluate current legal framework in EU and China regarding the improvement restoration of freshwater ecosystems. This policy study combines 1) the information gathered through the compilation of scientific literature regarding restoration practices in Europe and China, 2) the results from a Worksop session held in Beijing (6th and 7th of February 2018) and 3) an online survey regarding the evaluation of restoration projects developed in Europe and China. The diverse array of legislative pieces and obligations is set for different types of environmental problems, which is probably also a reflection of the maturation status of implementation of the several legislative pieces. The main degradation driver for restoration in Europe was the over-utilization of water resources (21.0%) and in China it was water pollution (29.4%). Another interesting aspect is that hydro-morphology restoration (28.6%) is the main restoration measure applied in the European projects surveyed, as opposed to threats removal in China (30.8%). This is probably due to the different implementation drivers in Europe and China, since the Water Framework Directive calls for the need on hydro-morphologic restoration, and in China all the main restoration drivers (1. the Three red lines of Most Stringent Water Resources Management; 2. Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Water Pollution; and 3. the Law for Prevention and Control of Water Pollution) call for pollution control and removal.European Ecological Federation2021-01-15T17:10:47Z2021-01-152019-09-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/28673http://hdl.handle.net/10174/28673porMendes, Ana; João Eduardo Rabaça. 2019. "Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China". In Abstract book of the European Ecological Federation (EEF). Lisbon, Portugal.: European Ecological Federation (EEF). Lisbon, Portugal., Lisbon, Portugal, 274-274. Lisbon, Portugal: European Ecological Federation.https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hbFZv93W1-eM6ZXgwqMSr8gLKcx1uQ8K/viewaimendes@uevora.ptjrabaca@uevora.ptndndndndndndndndnd221Mendes, AnaRabaça, JoãoLi, JihanhuaZhang, AdamXu, FengranBayinbaoligaoFabião, AndréFerreira, TeresaGoulão, TeresaChen, ChiachenVerdoncshot, Pietinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:25:26Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/28673Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:18:38.734415Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China |
title |
Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China |
spellingShingle |
Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China Mendes, Ana Restoration freshwater restoration |
title_short |
Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China |
title_full |
Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China |
title_fullStr |
Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China |
title_sort |
Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China |
author |
Mendes, Ana |
author_facet |
Mendes, Ana Rabaça, João Li, Jihanhua Zhang, Adam Xu, Fengran Bayinbaoligao Fabião, André Ferreira, Teresa Goulão, Teresa Chen, Chiachen Verdoncshot, Piet |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rabaça, João Li, Jihanhua Zhang, Adam Xu, Fengran Bayinbaoligao Fabião, André Ferreira, Teresa Goulão, Teresa Chen, Chiachen Verdoncshot, Piet |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mendes, Ana Rabaça, João Li, Jihanhua Zhang, Adam Xu, Fengran Bayinbaoligao Fabião, André Ferreira, Teresa Goulão, Teresa Chen, Chiachen Verdoncshot, Piet |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Restoration freshwater restoration |
topic |
Restoration freshwater restoration |
description |
The objective of the present study was to evaluate current legal framework in EU and China regarding the improvement restoration of freshwater ecosystems. This policy study combines 1) the information gathered through the compilation of scientific literature regarding restoration practices in Europe and China, 2) the results from a Worksop session held in Beijing (6th and 7th of February 2018) and 3) an online survey regarding the evaluation of restoration projects developed in Europe and China. The diverse array of legislative pieces and obligations is set for different types of environmental problems, which is probably also a reflection of the maturation status of implementation of the several legislative pieces. The main degradation driver for restoration in Europe was the over-utilization of water resources (21.0%) and in China it was water pollution (29.4%). Another interesting aspect is that hydro-morphology restoration (28.6%) is the main restoration measure applied in the European projects surveyed, as opposed to threats removal in China (30.8%). This is probably due to the different implementation drivers in Europe and China, since the Water Framework Directive calls for the need on hydro-morphologic restoration, and in China all the main restoration drivers (1. the Three red lines of Most Stringent Water Resources Management; 2. Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Water Pollution; and 3. the Law for Prevention and Control of Water Pollution) call for pollution control and removal. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-01T00:00:00Z 2021-01-15T17:10:47Z 2021-01-15 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/28673 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/28673 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/28673 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Mendes, Ana; João Eduardo Rabaça. 2019. "Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China". In Abstract book of the European Ecological Federation (EEF). Lisbon, Portugal.: European Ecological Federation (EEF). Lisbon, Portugal., Lisbon, Portugal, 274-274. Lisbon, Portugal: European Ecological Federation. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hbFZv93W1-eM6ZXgwqMSr8gLKcx1uQ8K/view aimendes@uevora.pt jrabaca@uevora.pt nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd 221 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
European Ecological Federation |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
European Ecological Federation |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136668281733120 |