Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mendes, Ana
Publication Date: 2019
Other Authors: Rabaça, João, Li, Jihanhua, Zhang, Adam, Xu, Fengran, Bayinbaoligao, Fabião, André, Ferreira, Teresa, Goulão, Teresa, Chen, Chiachen, Verdoncshot, Piet
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/28673
Summary: The objective of the present study was to evaluate current legal framework in EU and China regarding the improvement restoration of freshwater ecosystems. This policy study combines 1) the information gathered through the compilation of scientific literature regarding restoration practices in Europe and China, 2) the results from a Worksop session held in Beijing (6th and 7th of February 2018) and 3) an online survey regarding the evaluation of restoration projects developed in Europe and China. The diverse array of legislative pieces and obligations is set for different types of environmental problems, which is probably also a reflection of the maturation status of implementation of the several legislative pieces. The main degradation driver for restoration in Europe was the over-utilization of water resources (21.0%) and in China it was water pollution (29.4%). Another interesting aspect is that hydro-morphology restoration (28.6%) is the main restoration measure applied in the European projects surveyed, as opposed to threats removal in China (30.8%). This is probably due to the different implementation drivers in Europe and China, since the Water Framework Directive calls for the need on hydro-morphologic restoration, and in China all the main restoration drivers (1. the Three red lines of Most Stringent Water Resources Management; 2. Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Water Pollution; and 3. the Law for Prevention and Control of Water Pollution) call for pollution control and removal.
id RCAP_e7cffe39c6174678357eefc6c044e80f
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/28673
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and ChinaRestorationfreshwaterrestorationThe objective of the present study was to evaluate current legal framework in EU and China regarding the improvement restoration of freshwater ecosystems. This policy study combines 1) the information gathered through the compilation of scientific literature regarding restoration practices in Europe and China, 2) the results from a Worksop session held in Beijing (6th and 7th of February 2018) and 3) an online survey regarding the evaluation of restoration projects developed in Europe and China. The diverse array of legislative pieces and obligations is set for different types of environmental problems, which is probably also a reflection of the maturation status of implementation of the several legislative pieces. The main degradation driver for restoration in Europe was the over-utilization of water resources (21.0%) and in China it was water pollution (29.4%). Another interesting aspect is that hydro-morphology restoration (28.6%) is the main restoration measure applied in the European projects surveyed, as opposed to threats removal in China (30.8%). This is probably due to the different implementation drivers in Europe and China, since the Water Framework Directive calls for the need on hydro-morphologic restoration, and in China all the main restoration drivers (1. the Three red lines of Most Stringent Water Resources Management; 2. Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Water Pollution; and 3. the Law for Prevention and Control of Water Pollution) call for pollution control and removal.European Ecological Federation2021-01-15T17:10:47Z2021-01-152019-09-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/28673http://hdl.handle.net/10174/28673porMendes, Ana; João Eduardo Rabaça. 2019. "Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China". In Abstract book of the European Ecological Federation (EEF). Lisbon, Portugal.: European Ecological Federation (EEF). Lisbon, Portugal., Lisbon, Portugal, 274-274. Lisbon, Portugal: European Ecological Federation.https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hbFZv93W1-eM6ZXgwqMSr8gLKcx1uQ8K/viewaimendes@uevora.ptjrabaca@uevora.ptndndndndndndndndnd221Mendes, AnaRabaça, JoãoLi, JihanhuaZhang, AdamXu, FengranBayinbaoligaoFabião, AndréFerreira, TeresaGoulão, TeresaChen, ChiachenVerdoncshot, Pietinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:25:26Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/28673Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:18:38.734415Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China
title Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China
spellingShingle Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China
Mendes, Ana
Restoration
freshwater
restoration
title_short Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China
title_full Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China
title_fullStr Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China
title_sort Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China
author Mendes, Ana
author_facet Mendes, Ana
Rabaça, João
Li, Jihanhua
Zhang, Adam
Xu, Fengran
Bayinbaoligao
Fabião, André
Ferreira, Teresa
Goulão, Teresa
Chen, Chiachen
Verdoncshot, Piet
author_role author
author2 Rabaça, João
Li, Jihanhua
Zhang, Adam
Xu, Fengran
Bayinbaoligao
Fabião, André
Ferreira, Teresa
Goulão, Teresa
Chen, Chiachen
Verdoncshot, Piet
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendes, Ana
Rabaça, João
Li, Jihanhua
Zhang, Adam
Xu, Fengran
Bayinbaoligao
Fabião, André
Ferreira, Teresa
Goulão, Teresa
Chen, Chiachen
Verdoncshot, Piet
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Restoration
freshwater
restoration
topic Restoration
freshwater
restoration
description The objective of the present study was to evaluate current legal framework in EU and China regarding the improvement restoration of freshwater ecosystems. This policy study combines 1) the information gathered through the compilation of scientific literature regarding restoration practices in Europe and China, 2) the results from a Worksop session held in Beijing (6th and 7th of February 2018) and 3) an online survey regarding the evaluation of restoration projects developed in Europe and China. The diverse array of legislative pieces and obligations is set for different types of environmental problems, which is probably also a reflection of the maturation status of implementation of the several legislative pieces. The main degradation driver for restoration in Europe was the over-utilization of water resources (21.0%) and in China it was water pollution (29.4%). Another interesting aspect is that hydro-morphology restoration (28.6%) is the main restoration measure applied in the European projects surveyed, as opposed to threats removal in China (30.8%). This is probably due to the different implementation drivers in Europe and China, since the Water Framework Directive calls for the need on hydro-morphologic restoration, and in China all the main restoration drivers (1. the Three red lines of Most Stringent Water Resources Management; 2. Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Water Pollution; and 3. the Law for Prevention and Control of Water Pollution) call for pollution control and removal.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-01T00:00:00Z
2021-01-15T17:10:47Z
2021-01-15
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10174/28673
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/28673
url http://hdl.handle.net/10174/28673
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Mendes, Ana; João Eduardo Rabaça. 2019. "Comparing Policy Mixes and Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration Practices Results in Europe and China". In Abstract book of the European Ecological Federation (EEF). Lisbon, Portugal.: European Ecological Federation (EEF). Lisbon, Portugal., Lisbon, Portugal, 274-274. Lisbon, Portugal: European Ecological Federation.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hbFZv93W1-eM6ZXgwqMSr8gLKcx1uQ8K/view
aimendes@uevora.pt
jrabaca@uevora.pt
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
221
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv European Ecological Federation
publisher.none.fl_str_mv European Ecological Federation
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136668281733120