Comparison of geometric design, metallurgical features and mechanical behavior of ProTaper Gold SX and two replica-like instruments
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-28902021000100001 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objectives: To assess the characteristics, performance, and safety of ProTaper Gold SX (PTG SX) replica-like instruments. Methods: A multimethod research involving the assessment of geometric design (macro and through scanning electron microscope), Ti/Ni proportions (energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy), phase transformation temperatures (differential scanning calorimetry), torsional resistance, and flexibility was conducted to compare two SX replica-like instruments (Premium Taper Gold and Go-Taper Flex) with the original PTG SX. Results were compared using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey or Kruskal-Wallis tests according to gaussian or non-gaussian distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test). The significance level was set at 0.05. Results: The three SX instruments have nine cutting blades with helix angles of approximately 21o, symmetrical blade geometry without radial lands, a convex triangular cross-section design, and near equiatomic Ti/Ni atomic proportions. Design differences were observed at the tip geometry and surface finishing, which was smoother in the Premium Taper Gold and irregular in the Go-Taper Flex. Distinct R-phase start (Rs) and finish (Rf) phase transformation temperatures were noted between PTG (Rs ~48oC and Rf ~30oC), Go-Taper Flex (Rs ~43oC and Rf ~25oC), and Premium Taper Gold (Rs ~30oC and Rf ~15oC). In the mechanical tests, Go-Taper Flex presented lower maximum torque (mean 0.5 N.cm) and higher bending resistance (mean 582.2 gf) (less flexibility) than PTG (means 0.8 N.cm cliniand 447.1 gf) (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in the mechanical tests between Premium Taper Gold and PTG (P>0.05). Conclusions: Overall, the tested replica-like systems showed different features compared to the original PTG SX instrument. |
id |
RCAP_efa060289a94d875fa66ccc7a1303dc5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1646-28902021000100001 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Comparison of geometric design, metallurgical features and mechanical behavior of ProTaper Gold SX and two replica-like instrumentsDifferential scanning calorimetryEnergy dispersive x-ray spectroscopyMechanical stressNickel-titanium alloyTorsional forceAbstract Objectives: To assess the characteristics, performance, and safety of ProTaper Gold SX (PTG SX) replica-like instruments. Methods: A multimethod research involving the assessment of geometric design (macro and through scanning electron microscope), Ti/Ni proportions (energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy), phase transformation temperatures (differential scanning calorimetry), torsional resistance, and flexibility was conducted to compare two SX replica-like instruments (Premium Taper Gold and Go-Taper Flex) with the original PTG SX. Results were compared using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey or Kruskal-Wallis tests according to gaussian or non-gaussian distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test). The significance level was set at 0.05. Results: The three SX instruments have nine cutting blades with helix angles of approximately 21o, symmetrical blade geometry without radial lands, a convex triangular cross-section design, and near equiatomic Ti/Ni atomic proportions. Design differences were observed at the tip geometry and surface finishing, which was smoother in the Premium Taper Gold and irregular in the Go-Taper Flex. Distinct R-phase start (Rs) and finish (Rf) phase transformation temperatures were noted between PTG (Rs ~48oC and Rf ~30oC), Go-Taper Flex (Rs ~43oC and Rf ~25oC), and Premium Taper Gold (Rs ~30oC and Rf ~15oC). In the mechanical tests, Go-Taper Flex presented lower maximum torque (mean 0.5 N.cm) and higher bending resistance (mean 582.2 gf) (less flexibility) than PTG (means 0.8 N.cm cliniand 447.1 gf) (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in the mechanical tests between Premium Taper Gold and PTG (P>0.05). Conclusions: Overall, the tested replica-like systems showed different features compared to the original PTG SX instrument.Sociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentária2021-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-28902021000100001Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial v.62 n.1 2021reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-28902021000100001Martins,Jorge N.R.Silva,Emmanuel J.N.L.Marques,DuarteArantes-Oliveira,SofiaCaramês,JoãoVersiani,Marco Aurélioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:21:07Zoai:scielo:S1646-28902021000100001Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:28:15.652440Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of geometric design, metallurgical features and mechanical behavior of ProTaper Gold SX and two replica-like instruments |
title |
Comparison of geometric design, metallurgical features and mechanical behavior of ProTaper Gold SX and two replica-like instruments |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of geometric design, metallurgical features and mechanical behavior of ProTaper Gold SX and two replica-like instruments Martins,Jorge N.R. Differential scanning calorimetry Energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy Mechanical stress Nickel-titanium alloy Torsional force |
title_short |
Comparison of geometric design, metallurgical features and mechanical behavior of ProTaper Gold SX and two replica-like instruments |
title_full |
Comparison of geometric design, metallurgical features and mechanical behavior of ProTaper Gold SX and two replica-like instruments |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of geometric design, metallurgical features and mechanical behavior of ProTaper Gold SX and two replica-like instruments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of geometric design, metallurgical features and mechanical behavior of ProTaper Gold SX and two replica-like instruments |
title_sort |
Comparison of geometric design, metallurgical features and mechanical behavior of ProTaper Gold SX and two replica-like instruments |
author |
Martins,Jorge N.R. |
author_facet |
Martins,Jorge N.R. Silva,Emmanuel J.N.L. Marques,Duarte Arantes-Oliveira,Sofia Caramês,João Versiani,Marco Aurélio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva,Emmanuel J.N.L. Marques,Duarte Arantes-Oliveira,Sofia Caramês,João Versiani,Marco Aurélio |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martins,Jorge N.R. Silva,Emmanuel J.N.L. Marques,Duarte Arantes-Oliveira,Sofia Caramês,João Versiani,Marco Aurélio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Differential scanning calorimetry Energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy Mechanical stress Nickel-titanium alloy Torsional force |
topic |
Differential scanning calorimetry Energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy Mechanical stress Nickel-titanium alloy Torsional force |
description |
Abstract Objectives: To assess the characteristics, performance, and safety of ProTaper Gold SX (PTG SX) replica-like instruments. Methods: A multimethod research involving the assessment of geometric design (macro and through scanning electron microscope), Ti/Ni proportions (energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy), phase transformation temperatures (differential scanning calorimetry), torsional resistance, and flexibility was conducted to compare two SX replica-like instruments (Premium Taper Gold and Go-Taper Flex) with the original PTG SX. Results were compared using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey or Kruskal-Wallis tests according to gaussian or non-gaussian distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test). The significance level was set at 0.05. Results: The three SX instruments have nine cutting blades with helix angles of approximately 21o, symmetrical blade geometry without radial lands, a convex triangular cross-section design, and near equiatomic Ti/Ni atomic proportions. Design differences were observed at the tip geometry and surface finishing, which was smoother in the Premium Taper Gold and irregular in the Go-Taper Flex. Distinct R-phase start (Rs) and finish (Rf) phase transformation temperatures were noted between PTG (Rs ~48oC and Rf ~30oC), Go-Taper Flex (Rs ~43oC and Rf ~25oC), and Premium Taper Gold (Rs ~30oC and Rf ~15oC). In the mechanical tests, Go-Taper Flex presented lower maximum torque (mean 0.5 N.cm) and higher bending resistance (mean 582.2 gf) (less flexibility) than PTG (means 0.8 N.cm cliniand 447.1 gf) (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in the mechanical tests between Premium Taper Gold and PTG (P>0.05). Conclusions: Overall, the tested replica-like systems showed different features compared to the original PTG SX instrument. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-28902021000100001 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-28902021000100001 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1646-28902021000100001 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentária |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentária |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial v.62 n.1 2021 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137352933703680 |