Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Berfelde, Mathilde
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/19711
Resumo: The thesis examines the generosity of unemployment benefits granted to non-standard (outsiders) and standard workers (insiders) in four different countries (Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy and Sweden) between 2000 and 2017, which were selected based on their value to represent a different institutional legacy. These legacies were based off the Varieties of Capitalism literature and the Welfare Regime literature. Comparative Case Study Analysis was the chosen methodology to assess the unemployment benefit reforms, which were primarily retrieved from the LABREF database. Two supporting theories were used to analyse the outcomes, dualization theory and liberalization theory. The findings showed a clear correlation between the institutional legacies of each case and the generosity of the unemployment benefits given to insiders and outsiders. The alternative explanation that a common trend towards liberalization made unemployment benefit systems converge in all four countries could not be supported.
id RCAP_f1267e791402b7f1bea3ff3410aa2d67
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/19711
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contractsDesemprego -- UnemploymentUnemployment insuranceUnemployment modelsEmploymentThe thesis examines the generosity of unemployment benefits granted to non-standard (outsiders) and standard workers (insiders) in four different countries (Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy and Sweden) between 2000 and 2017, which were selected based on their value to represent a different institutional legacy. These legacies were based off the Varieties of Capitalism literature and the Welfare Regime literature. Comparative Case Study Analysis was the chosen methodology to assess the unemployment benefit reforms, which were primarily retrieved from the LABREF database. Two supporting theories were used to analyse the outcomes, dualization theory and liberalization theory. The findings showed a clear correlation between the institutional legacies of each case and the generosity of the unemployment benefits given to insiders and outsiders. The alternative explanation that a common trend towards liberalization made unemployment benefit systems converge in all four countries could not be supported.2020-01-27T16:11:58Z2020-01-13T00:00:00Z2020-01-132019-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/19711TID:202372758engBerfelde, Mathildeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:59:16Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/19711Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:31:04.708199Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts
title Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts
spellingShingle Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts
Berfelde, Mathilde
Desemprego -- Unemployment
Unemployment insurance
Unemployment models
Employment
title_short Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts
title_full Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts
title_fullStr Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts
title_full_unstemmed Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts
title_sort Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts
author Berfelde, Mathilde
author_facet Berfelde, Mathilde
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Berfelde, Mathilde
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Desemprego -- Unemployment
Unemployment insurance
Unemployment models
Employment
topic Desemprego -- Unemployment
Unemployment insurance
Unemployment models
Employment
description The thesis examines the generosity of unemployment benefits granted to non-standard (outsiders) and standard workers (insiders) in four different countries (Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy and Sweden) between 2000 and 2017, which were selected based on their value to represent a different institutional legacy. These legacies were based off the Varieties of Capitalism literature and the Welfare Regime literature. Comparative Case Study Analysis was the chosen methodology to assess the unemployment benefit reforms, which were primarily retrieved from the LABREF database. Two supporting theories were used to analyse the outcomes, dualization theory and liberalization theory. The findings showed a clear correlation between the institutional legacies of each case and the generosity of the unemployment benefits given to insiders and outsiders. The alternative explanation that a common trend towards liberalization made unemployment benefit systems converge in all four countries could not be supported.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10
2020-01-27T16:11:58Z
2020-01-13T00:00:00Z
2020-01-13
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/19711
TID:202372758
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/19711
identifier_str_mv TID:202372758
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134872883691520