Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: São Pedro, Verónica
Publication Date: 2021
Other Authors: Pires, Rafaela, Santos, Fernanda, Tovim Rodrigues, Carla, Santos Silva, Isabel, Almeida, Maria do Céu, Águas, Fernanda
Format: Article
Language: por
eng
Source: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Download full: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033
Summary: Introduction: Opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy has been proposed as an ovarian cancer risk-reducing strategy namely as a means of tubal sterilization. We aimed to assess what were the procedures for interval and peripartum sterilization carried out nationwide, related motivational aspects and influential demographic or professional factors.Material and Methods: Cross-sectional study based on an original survey sent to Obstetrics and Gynecology specialists and residents from across the country in 2019.Results: Two hundred and twenty-five answers were obtained from 42 institutions (37 from the public sector). Laparoscopic tubal electrocoagulation (61%) was the most common procedure for interval sterilization followed by salpingectomy (28%). Major reasons pointed out for not performing salpingectomy were increased operative time (48.5%) and procedure not considered (45.5%). In some hospitals, the choice of salpingectomy depended on specific criteria namely surgical team decision. During cesarean-section, sterilization was most frequently performed using the modified Pomeroy technique (54%), followed by salpingectomy (32.5%), with a statistically significant prevalence in the north of the country. Sixty-nine percent of Portuguese Obstetrics and Gynecology residents and specialists consider that salpingectomy should be the procedure offered to women asking for definitive contraception.Discussion: Although data are limited, salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery appears feasible and safe and this context might represent the best opportunity for intervention.Conclusion: Opportunistic salpingectomy is not the most common sterilization procedure performed in Portugal, but it was considered the best choice to offer. Its benefits and risks should be discussed with women.
id RCAP_faff40297518008eab01c0a1b18dd0e8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/14033
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in PortugalSalpingectomia Profilática como Método de Contraceção Definitiva: Estudo Transversal em PortugalOvarian Neoplasms/prevention & controlProphylactic Surgical ProceduresSalpingectomySterilizationReproductiveSurveys and QuestionnairesEsterilização ReprodutivaInquéritos e QuestionáriosNeoplasias dos Ovários/prevenção e controloProcedimentos Cirúrgicos ProfiláticosSalpingectomiaIntroduction: Opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy has been proposed as an ovarian cancer risk-reducing strategy namely as a means of tubal sterilization. We aimed to assess what were the procedures for interval and peripartum sterilization carried out nationwide, related motivational aspects and influential demographic or professional factors.Material and Methods: Cross-sectional study based on an original survey sent to Obstetrics and Gynecology specialists and residents from across the country in 2019.Results: Two hundred and twenty-five answers were obtained from 42 institutions (37 from the public sector). Laparoscopic tubal electrocoagulation (61%) was the most common procedure for interval sterilization followed by salpingectomy (28%). Major reasons pointed out for not performing salpingectomy were increased operative time (48.5%) and procedure not considered (45.5%). In some hospitals, the choice of salpingectomy depended on specific criteria namely surgical team decision. During cesarean-section, sterilization was most frequently performed using the modified Pomeroy technique (54%), followed by salpingectomy (32.5%), with a statistically significant prevalence in the north of the country. Sixty-nine percent of Portuguese Obstetrics and Gynecology residents and specialists consider that salpingectomy should be the procedure offered to women asking for definitive contraception.Discussion: Although data are limited, salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery appears feasible and safe and this context might represent the best opportunity for intervention.Conclusion: Opportunistic salpingectomy is not the most common sterilization procedure performed in Portugal, but it was considered the best choice to offer. Its benefits and risks should be discussed with women.Introdução: A salpingectomia profilática foi proposta como estratégia de redução do risco de cancro do ovário e método de contraceção definitiva. O objetivo deste estudo foi conhecer os procedimentos realizados a nível nacional para contraceção definitiva de intervalo e peri-parto, a opinião e motivações dos clínicos, e os fatores demográficos ou profissionais influentes.Material e Métodos: Este é um estudo analítico transversal, baseado num questionário original enviado durante o ano de 2019 a especialistas e internos de Ginecologia-Obstetrícia a exercer em Portugal.Resultados: Obtivemos 225 respostas provenientes de médicos a exercer em 42 hospitais (37 públicos). A laqueação tubar laparoscópica por eletrocoagulação e corte (61%) foi o método mais frequentemente utilizado na mulher não grávida, seguido da salpingectomia (28%). Os principais motivos apontados para não realizar salpingectomia foram o aumento do tempo operatório (48,5%) e tratar-se de procedimento não equacionado (45,5%). Em alguns hospitais, a realização deste método dependia da decisão da equipa cirúrgica. No contexto per-cesariana, a técnica mais comum foi a de Pomeroy modificada (54%), seguida da salpingectomia (32,5%), com uma concentração no Norte do país com significado estatístico. A maioria (69%) dos participantes consideraram que a salpingectomia deveria ser o procedimento disponibilizado.Discussão: Apesar da evidência científica ainda ser escassa, a salpingectomia per-cesariana parece exequível e segura, podendo representar a melhor oportunidade para intervenção no contexto da contraceção definitiva.Conclusão: A salpingectomia profilática não é o procedimento de esterilização mais comum em Portugal, mas foi considerada como a escolha mais adequada. Os seus benefícios e riscos devem ser discutidos com as mulheres.Ordem dos Médicos2021-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentimage/jpeghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/14033Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 34 No. 4 (2021): April; 258-265Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 34 N.º 4 (2021): Abril; 258-2651646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/6303https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/6726https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/6304https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/6305https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/12548https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/12549https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/12550https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/12551https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/12552https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/12654https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/12655https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/12751Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSão Pedro, VerónicaPires, RafaelaSantos, FernandaTovim Rodrigues, CarlaSantos Silva, IsabelAlmeida, Maria do CéuÁguas, Fernanda2022-12-20T11:07:05Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/14033Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:20:25.701611Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal
Salpingectomia Profilática como Método de Contraceção Definitiva: Estudo Transversal em Portugal
title Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal
spellingShingle Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal
São Pedro, Verónica
Ovarian Neoplasms/prevention & control
Prophylactic Surgical Procedures
Salpingectomy
Sterilization
Reproductive
Surveys and Questionnaires
Esterilização Reprodutiva
Inquéritos e Questionários
Neoplasias dos Ovários/prevenção e controlo
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Profiláticos
Salpingectomia
title_short Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal
title_full Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal
title_fullStr Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal
title_full_unstemmed Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal
title_sort Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal
author São Pedro, Verónica
author_facet São Pedro, Verónica
Pires, Rafaela
Santos, Fernanda
Tovim Rodrigues, Carla
Santos Silva, Isabel
Almeida, Maria do Céu
Águas, Fernanda
author_role author
author2 Pires, Rafaela
Santos, Fernanda
Tovim Rodrigues, Carla
Santos Silva, Isabel
Almeida, Maria do Céu
Águas, Fernanda
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv São Pedro, Verónica
Pires, Rafaela
Santos, Fernanda
Tovim Rodrigues, Carla
Santos Silva, Isabel
Almeida, Maria do Céu
Águas, Fernanda
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ovarian Neoplasms/prevention & control
Prophylactic Surgical Procedures
Salpingectomy
Sterilization
Reproductive
Surveys and Questionnaires
Esterilização Reprodutiva
Inquéritos e Questionários
Neoplasias dos Ovários/prevenção e controlo
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Profiláticos
Salpingectomia
topic Ovarian Neoplasms/prevention & control
Prophylactic Surgical Procedures
Salpingectomy
Sterilization
Reproductive
Surveys and Questionnaires
Esterilização Reprodutiva
Inquéritos e Questionários
Neoplasias dos Ovários/prevenção e controlo
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Profiláticos
Salpingectomia
description Introduction: Opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy has been proposed as an ovarian cancer risk-reducing strategy namely as a means of tubal sterilization. We aimed to assess what were the procedures for interval and peripartum sterilization carried out nationwide, related motivational aspects and influential demographic or professional factors.Material and Methods: Cross-sectional study based on an original survey sent to Obstetrics and Gynecology specialists and residents from across the country in 2019.Results: Two hundred and twenty-five answers were obtained from 42 institutions (37 from the public sector). Laparoscopic tubal electrocoagulation (61%) was the most common procedure for interval sterilization followed by salpingectomy (28%). Major reasons pointed out for not performing salpingectomy were increased operative time (48.5%) and procedure not considered (45.5%). In some hospitals, the choice of salpingectomy depended on specific criteria namely surgical team decision. During cesarean-section, sterilization was most frequently performed using the modified Pomeroy technique (54%), followed by salpingectomy (32.5%), with a statistically significant prevalence in the north of the country. Sixty-nine percent of Portuguese Obstetrics and Gynecology residents and specialists consider that salpingectomy should be the procedure offered to women asking for definitive contraception.Discussion: Although data are limited, salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery appears feasible and safe and this context might represent the best opportunity for intervention.Conclusion: Opportunistic salpingectomy is not the most common sterilization procedure performed in Portugal, but it was considered the best choice to offer. Its benefits and risks should be discussed with women.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/14033
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/14033
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/6303
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/6726
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/6304
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/6305
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/12548
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/12549
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/12550
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/12551
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/12552
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/12654
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/12655
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/14033/12751
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Acta Médica Portuguesa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Acta Médica Portuguesa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
image/jpeg
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 34 No. 4 (2021): April; 258-265
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 34 N.º 4 (2021): Abril; 258-265
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130652683010048