Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Second-Line Chemotherapy: Is It Worthwhile? A LiverMetSurvey Analysis of 6415 Patients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Adam, R
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Yi, B, Innominato, PF, Barroso, E, Laurent, C, Giuliante, F, Capussotti, L, Lapointe, R, Regimbeau, JM, Lopez-Ben, S, Isoniemi, H, Hubert, C, Lin, JK, Gruenberger, T, Elias, D, Skipenko, OG, Guglielmi, A
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2922
Resumo: PURPOSE: Patient outcome after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) following second-line preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) performed for insufficient response or toxicity of the first-line, is little known and has here been compared to the outcome following first-line. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to June 2013, 5624 and 791 consecutive patients of a prospective international cohort received 1 and 2 PCT lines before CLM resection (group 1 and 2, respectively). Survival and prognostic factors were analysed. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 30.1 months, there was no difference in survival from CLM diagnosis (median, 3-, and 5-year overall survival [OS]: 58.6 months, 76% and 49% in group 2 versus 58.9 months, 71% and 49% in group 1, respectively, P = 0.32). After hepatectomy, disease-free survival (DFS) was however shorter in group 2: 17.2 months, 27% and 15% versus 19.4 months, 32% and 23%, respectively (P = 0.001). Among the initially unresectable patients of group 1 and 2, no statistical difference in OS or DFS was observed. Independent predictors of worse OS in group 2 were positive primary lymph nodes, extrahepatic disease, tumour progression on second line, R2 resection and number of hepatectomies/year <50. Positive primary nodes, synchronous and bilateral metastases were predictors of shorter DFS. Initial unresectability did not impact OS or DFS in group 2. CONCLUSION: CLM resection following second-line PCT, after oncosurgically favourable selection, could bring similar OS compared to what observed after first-line. For initially unresectable patients, OS or DFS is comparable between first- and second-line PCT. Surgery should not be denied after the failure of first-line chemotherapy.
id RCAP_fd3642b43f027c478317399f72c8e89f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/2922
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Second-Line Chemotherapy: Is It Worthwhile? A LiverMetSurvey Analysis of 6415 PatientsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinCatheter AblationCetuximabDisease ProgressionDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHepatectomyHumansLiver NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative CarePreoperative CareProspective StudiesRegistriesColonic NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsCHLC CHBPTPURPOSE: Patient outcome after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) following second-line preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) performed for insufficient response or toxicity of the first-line, is little known and has here been compared to the outcome following first-line. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to June 2013, 5624 and 791 consecutive patients of a prospective international cohort received 1 and 2 PCT lines before CLM resection (group 1 and 2, respectively). Survival and prognostic factors were analysed. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 30.1 months, there was no difference in survival from CLM diagnosis (median, 3-, and 5-year overall survival [OS]: 58.6 months, 76% and 49% in group 2 versus 58.9 months, 71% and 49% in group 1, respectively, P = 0.32). After hepatectomy, disease-free survival (DFS) was however shorter in group 2: 17.2 months, 27% and 15% versus 19.4 months, 32% and 23%, respectively (P = 0.001). Among the initially unresectable patients of group 1 and 2, no statistical difference in OS or DFS was observed. Independent predictors of worse OS in group 2 were positive primary lymph nodes, extrahepatic disease, tumour progression on second line, R2 resection and number of hepatectomies/year <50. Positive primary nodes, synchronous and bilateral metastases were predictors of shorter DFS. Initial unresectability did not impact OS or DFS in group 2. CONCLUSION: CLM resection following second-line PCT, after oncosurgically favourable selection, could bring similar OS compared to what observed after first-line. For initially unresectable patients, OS or DFS is comparable between first- and second-line PCT. Surgery should not be denied after the failure of first-line chemotherapy.ElsevierRepositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPEAdam, RYi, BInnominato, PFBarroso, ELaurent, CGiuliante, FCapussotti, LLapointe, RRegimbeau, JMLopez-Ben, SIsoniemi, HHubert, CLin, JKGruenberger, TElias, DSkipenko, OGGuglielmi, A2018-03-02T15:20:23Z20172017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2922engEur J Cancer. 2017 Jun;78:7-1510.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-10T09:40:20Zoai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/2922Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:20:14.858909Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Second-Line Chemotherapy: Is It Worthwhile? A LiverMetSurvey Analysis of 6415 Patients
title Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Second-Line Chemotherapy: Is It Worthwhile? A LiverMetSurvey Analysis of 6415 Patients
spellingShingle Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Second-Line Chemotherapy: Is It Worthwhile? A LiverMetSurvey Analysis of 6415 Patients
Adam, R
Antibodies, Monoclonal
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Camptothecin
Catheter Ablation
Cetuximab
Disease Progression
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Hepatectomy
Humans
Liver Neoplasms
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Care
Preoperative Care
Prospective Studies
Registries
Colonic Neoplasms
Rectal Neoplasms
CHLC CHBPT
title_short Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Second-Line Chemotherapy: Is It Worthwhile? A LiverMetSurvey Analysis of 6415 Patients
title_full Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Second-Line Chemotherapy: Is It Worthwhile? A LiverMetSurvey Analysis of 6415 Patients
title_fullStr Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Second-Line Chemotherapy: Is It Worthwhile? A LiverMetSurvey Analysis of 6415 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Second-Line Chemotherapy: Is It Worthwhile? A LiverMetSurvey Analysis of 6415 Patients
title_sort Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Second-Line Chemotherapy: Is It Worthwhile? A LiverMetSurvey Analysis of 6415 Patients
author Adam, R
author_facet Adam, R
Yi, B
Innominato, PF
Barroso, E
Laurent, C
Giuliante, F
Capussotti, L
Lapointe, R
Regimbeau, JM
Lopez-Ben, S
Isoniemi, H
Hubert, C
Lin, JK
Gruenberger, T
Elias, D
Skipenko, OG
Guglielmi, A
author_role author
author2 Yi, B
Innominato, PF
Barroso, E
Laurent, C
Giuliante, F
Capussotti, L
Lapointe, R
Regimbeau, JM
Lopez-Ben, S
Isoniemi, H
Hubert, C
Lin, JK
Gruenberger, T
Elias, D
Skipenko, OG
Guglielmi, A
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPE
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Adam, R
Yi, B
Innominato, PF
Barroso, E
Laurent, C
Giuliante, F
Capussotti, L
Lapointe, R
Regimbeau, JM
Lopez-Ben, S
Isoniemi, H
Hubert, C
Lin, JK
Gruenberger, T
Elias, D
Skipenko, OG
Guglielmi, A
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Antibodies, Monoclonal
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Camptothecin
Catheter Ablation
Cetuximab
Disease Progression
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Hepatectomy
Humans
Liver Neoplasms
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Care
Preoperative Care
Prospective Studies
Registries
Colonic Neoplasms
Rectal Neoplasms
CHLC CHBPT
topic Antibodies, Monoclonal
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Camptothecin
Catheter Ablation
Cetuximab
Disease Progression
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Hepatectomy
Humans
Liver Neoplasms
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Care
Preoperative Care
Prospective Studies
Registries
Colonic Neoplasms
Rectal Neoplasms
CHLC CHBPT
description PURPOSE: Patient outcome after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) following second-line preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) performed for insufficient response or toxicity of the first-line, is little known and has here been compared to the outcome following first-line. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to June 2013, 5624 and 791 consecutive patients of a prospective international cohort received 1 and 2 PCT lines before CLM resection (group 1 and 2, respectively). Survival and prognostic factors were analysed. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 30.1 months, there was no difference in survival from CLM diagnosis (median, 3-, and 5-year overall survival [OS]: 58.6 months, 76% and 49% in group 2 versus 58.9 months, 71% and 49% in group 1, respectively, P = 0.32). After hepatectomy, disease-free survival (DFS) was however shorter in group 2: 17.2 months, 27% and 15% versus 19.4 months, 32% and 23%, respectively (P = 0.001). Among the initially unresectable patients of group 1 and 2, no statistical difference in OS or DFS was observed. Independent predictors of worse OS in group 2 were positive primary lymph nodes, extrahepatic disease, tumour progression on second line, R2 resection and number of hepatectomies/year <50. Positive primary nodes, synchronous and bilateral metastases were predictors of shorter DFS. Initial unresectability did not impact OS or DFS in group 2. CONCLUSION: CLM resection following second-line PCT, after oncosurgically favourable selection, could bring similar OS compared to what observed after first-line. For initially unresectable patients, OS or DFS is comparable between first- and second-line PCT. Surgery should not be denied after the failure of first-line chemotherapy.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
2018-03-02T15:20:23Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2922
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2922
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Eur J Cancer. 2017 Jun;78:7-15
10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131298752626688