Pure theory of law: criticism of interpretation in Kelsen
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi |
Texto Completo: | https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13956 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: to present the basic concepts of the pure theory of law and to approach the problems surrounding the theme of interpretation in Kelsen. METHOD: the research is developed qualitatively, using the bibliographic method, with investigations carried out in books and academic articles, published in prestigious journals. RELEVANCE / ORIGINALITY: the study is relevant, in the perspective of the expressive influence of the pure theory of law in contemporary legal systems. Furthermore, critical approaches are justified, with the focus of: a) to identify, in Kelsenian thought, possible inconsistencies; and b) to propose changes concerning its practical applicability. RESULTS: it is concluded that the granting of excessive discretion to the interpreter constitutes a relevant blemish for the pure theory of law. THEORETICAL / METHODOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTIONS: the pure theory of law does not respond effectively to the demands presented to the interpreters / judges. Therefore, the theoretical contribution lies in fostering legal archetypes that face the phenomena of interpretation / decision with more consistency. |
id |
RD-0_f753aeedcad19ee9dbf53232b0492c35 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br:article/13956 |
network_acronym_str |
RD-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pure theory of law: criticism of interpretation in KelsenTeoria pura del diritto: critica all’interpretazione in KelsenHans Kelsen. Teoria pura del diritto. Interpretazione. Riservatezza.Hans Kelsen. Pure theory of law. Interpretation. Discretion.OBJECTIVE: to present the basic concepts of the pure theory of law and to approach the problems surrounding the theme of interpretation in Kelsen. METHOD: the research is developed qualitatively, using the bibliographic method, with investigations carried out in books and academic articles, published in prestigious journals. RELEVANCE / ORIGINALITY: the study is relevant, in the perspective of the expressive influence of the pure theory of law in contemporary legal systems. Furthermore, critical approaches are justified, with the focus of: a) to identify, in Kelsenian thought, possible inconsistencies; and b) to propose changes concerning its practical applicability. RESULTS: it is concluded that the granting of excessive discretion to the interpreter constitutes a relevant blemish for the pure theory of law. THEORETICAL / METHODOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTIONS: the pure theory of law does not respond effectively to the demands presented to the interpreters / judges. Therefore, the theoretical contribution lies in fostering legal archetypes that face the phenomena of interpretation / decision with more consistency.OBIETTIVO: introdurre i concetti di base della teoria pura del diritto e discutere i problemi che circondano il tema dell'interpretazione in Kelsen. METODO: la ricerca viene svolta qualitativamente, utilizzando il metodo bibliografico, con indagini svolte su libri e articoli accademici, pubblicati su prestigiose riviste. RILEVANZA / ORIGINALITÀ: lo studio è rilevante, in considerazione dell'influenza espressiva della teoria pura del diritto negli ordinamenti giuridici contemporanei. Inoltre, sono giustificati approcci critici, con l'obiettivo di: a) identificare, nel pensiero kelseniano, possibili inconsistenze; e b) proporre modifiche riguardanti la sua applicabilità pratica. RISULTATI: si conclude che la concessione di un'eccessiva discrezionalità all'interprete costituisce un difetto rilevante per la teoria pura del diritto. CONTRIBUTI TEORICI / METODOLOGICI: la teoria pura del diritto non risponde efficacemente alle richieste presentate agli interpreti / giudici. Pertanto, il contributo teorico sta nella promozione di archetipi giuridici che affrontano in modo più solido i fenomeni di interpretazione / decisione.Centro Universitário FG (UniFG)2021-05-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/1395610.29293/rdfg.v8i01.302Guanambi College Law Journal; Vol. 8 No. 01 (2021); e302Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi; v. 8 n. 01 (2021); e3022447-6536reponame:Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambiinstname:Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG)instacron:RDenghttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13956/7784https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13956/7785Copyright (c) 2021 Williem Da silva Barreto, Sérgio Urquhart de Cademartorihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarreto, Williem da SilvaCademartori, Sérgio Urquhart de2022-07-11T19:30:34Zoai:portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br:article/13956Revistahttp://revistas.faculdadeguanambi.edu.br/index.php/RevistadedireitoONGhttp://revistas.faculdadeguanambi.edu.br/index.php/Revistadedireito/oaimuriloricart@hotmail.com || revistadedireito@faculdadeguanambi.edu.br2447-65362447-6536opendoar:2022-07-11T19:30:34Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi - Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pure theory of law: criticism of interpretation in Kelsen Teoria pura del diritto: critica all’interpretazione in Kelsen |
title |
Pure theory of law: criticism of interpretation in Kelsen |
spellingShingle |
Pure theory of law: criticism of interpretation in Kelsen Barreto, Williem da Silva Hans Kelsen. Teoria pura del diritto. Interpretazione. Riservatezza. Hans Kelsen. Pure theory of law. Interpretation. Discretion. |
title_short |
Pure theory of law: criticism of interpretation in Kelsen |
title_full |
Pure theory of law: criticism of interpretation in Kelsen |
title_fullStr |
Pure theory of law: criticism of interpretation in Kelsen |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pure theory of law: criticism of interpretation in Kelsen |
title_sort |
Pure theory of law: criticism of interpretation in Kelsen |
author |
Barreto, Williem da Silva |
author_facet |
Barreto, Williem da Silva Cademartori, Sérgio Urquhart de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cademartori, Sérgio Urquhart de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barreto, Williem da Silva Cademartori, Sérgio Urquhart de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hans Kelsen. Teoria pura del diritto. Interpretazione. Riservatezza. Hans Kelsen. Pure theory of law. Interpretation. Discretion. |
topic |
Hans Kelsen. Teoria pura del diritto. Interpretazione. Riservatezza. Hans Kelsen. Pure theory of law. Interpretation. Discretion. |
description |
OBJECTIVE: to present the basic concepts of the pure theory of law and to approach the problems surrounding the theme of interpretation in Kelsen. METHOD: the research is developed qualitatively, using the bibliographic method, with investigations carried out in books and academic articles, published in prestigious journals. RELEVANCE / ORIGINALITY: the study is relevant, in the perspective of the expressive influence of the pure theory of law in contemporary legal systems. Furthermore, critical approaches are justified, with the focus of: a) to identify, in Kelsenian thought, possible inconsistencies; and b) to propose changes concerning its practical applicability. RESULTS: it is concluded that the granting of excessive discretion to the interpreter constitutes a relevant blemish for the pure theory of law. THEORETICAL / METHODOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTIONS: the pure theory of law does not respond effectively to the demands presented to the interpreters / judges. Therefore, the theoretical contribution lies in fostering legal archetypes that face the phenomena of interpretation / decision with more consistency. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13956 10.29293/rdfg.v8i01.302 |
url |
https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13956 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.29293/rdfg.v8i01.302 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13956/7784 https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/RDFG/article/view/13956/7785 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Williem Da silva Barreto, Sérgio Urquhart de Cademartori https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Williem Da silva Barreto, Sérgio Urquhart de Cademartori https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário FG (UniFG) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário FG (UniFG) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Guanambi College Law Journal; Vol. 8 No. 01 (2021); e302 Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi; v. 8 n. 01 (2021); e302 2447-6536 reponame:Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi instname:Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG) instacron:RD |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG) |
instacron_str |
RD |
institution |
RD |
reponame_str |
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi |
collection |
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito da Faculdade Guanambi - Centro Universitário UniFG (UniFG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
muriloricart@hotmail.com || revistadedireito@faculdadeguanambi.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797240130018213888 |