Why should the sambaqui society be considered as middle ground?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Scheel-Ybert, Rita
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Boyadjian, Célia, Capucho, Taís
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Arqueologia
Texto Completo: https://revista.sabnet.org/ojs/index.php/sab/article/view/995
Resumo:   Studies from the last two decades show the importance of plants for sambaqui builders, recently indicating a mixed-economy system, in which fishing and gathering may have been combined with horticulture. Nevertheless, fishing and animal protein intake are still considered key within their social and economic spheres, while the importance of plants remains underestimated. The relevance of plants to the sambaqui people is demonstrated through remains which are less conspicuous than the animal remains, but of no less importance. Here we discuss the position of these groups as “middle ground societies”. This concept describes a great variety of ways of life that do not fit the outdated “foragers versus farmers” dichotomy and which were more common and longer-lasting than previously thought.
id SAB-1_bd8184b0432505f2e67f4b853dc20e45
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.revista.sabnet.org:article/995
network_acronym_str SAB-1
network_name_str Revista de Arqueologia
repository_id_str
spelling Why should the sambaqui society be considered as middle ground?¿Por qué la sociedad sambaquiana debe ser considerada como de término medio?Por que a sociedade sambaquiana deve ser considerada como de meio termo?Produção de alimentosArqueobotânicaPaisagemFood productionArchaeobotanyLandscapeProducción de alimentos; Arqueobotánica, PaisajeProducción de alimentosArqueobotánicaPaisaje  Studies from the last two decades show the importance of plants for sambaqui builders, recently indicating a mixed-economy system, in which fishing and gathering may have been combined with horticulture. Nevertheless, fishing and animal protein intake are still considered key within their social and economic spheres, while the importance of plants remains underestimated. The relevance of plants to the sambaqui people is demonstrated through remains which are less conspicuous than the animal remains, but of no less importance. Here we discuss the position of these groups as “middle ground societies”. This concept describes a great variety of ways of life that do not fit the outdated “foragers versus farmers” dichotomy and which were more common and longer-lasting than previously thought.Estudios arqueobotánicos demuestran la importancia de las plantas en los sambaquis, apuntando recientemente a un régimen de economía mixta, con pesca y recolección asociadas a horticultura. Sin embargo, la pesca y el consumo de proteína animal se consideran centrales en su esfera económica y social, pero el papel de las plantas sigue siendo subestimado. La relevancia de las plantas para estos pueblos está demostrada por restos botánicos que son menos conspicuos que los faunísticos, pero no menos significativos. Discutimos la posición de estos grupos como una “sociedad de término medio”, concepto que abarca una variedad de formas de vida que no encajan en la anticuada dicotomía “recolectores versus agricultores” y que fueron mucho más comunes y duraderas de lo que se pensaba.Há duas décadas, estudos arqueobotânicos demonstram a importância das plantas em sambaquis, recentemente apontando para um regime de economia mista, com pesca e coleta associadas à horticultura. No entanto, pesca e consumo de proteína animal são considerados centrais nas esferas econômicas e sociais dessas pessoas, enquanto o papel das plantas permanece subestimado. A relevância das plantas é demonstrada por vestígios botânicos que são menos conspícuos do que os faunísticos, mas não menos significativos. Assim, discutimos aqui a sociedade sambaquiana enquanto “sociedade de meio termo”, conceito que engloba uma enorme variedade de modos de vida que não se enquadram na concepção ultrapassada da dicotomia forrageadores versus agricultores e que foram muito mais comuns e duradouros ​​do que se costuma pensar.Sociedade de Arqueologia Brasileira2022-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.sabnet.org/ojs/index.php/sab/article/view/99510.24885/sab.v35i3.995Revista de Arqueologia; Vol. 35 No. 3 (2022); 3-31Revista de Arqueologia; Vol. 35 Núm. 3 (2022); 3-31Revista de Arqueologia; Vol. 35 No 3 (2022); 3-31Revista de Arqueologia; v. 35 n. 3 (2022); 3-311982-19990102-042010.24885/sab.v35i3reponame:Revista de Arqueologiainstname:Sociedade de Arqueologia Brasileira (SAB)instacron:SABporhttps://revista.sabnet.org/ojs/index.php/sab/article/view/995/816Copyright (c) 2022 Rita Scheel-Ybert, Célia Boyadjian, Taís Capuchohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessScheel-Ybert, RitaBoyadjian, Célia Capucho, Taís2022-11-25T14:45:43Zoai:ojs2.revista.sabnet.org:article/995Revistahttps://revista.sabnet.org/ojs/index.php/sabPUBhttps://revista.sabnet.org/ojs/index.php/sab/oairevistadearqueologia@gmail.com || revistasab.ojs@gmail.com1982-19990102-0420opendoar:2022-11-25T14:45:43Revista de Arqueologia - Sociedade de Arqueologia Brasileira (SAB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Why should the sambaqui society be considered as middle ground?
¿Por qué la sociedad sambaquiana debe ser considerada como de término medio?
Por que a sociedade sambaquiana deve ser considerada como de meio termo?
title Why should the sambaqui society be considered as middle ground?
spellingShingle Why should the sambaqui society be considered as middle ground?
Scheel-Ybert, Rita
Produção de alimentos
Arqueobotânica
Paisagem
Food production
Archaeobotany
Landscape
Producción de alimentos; Arqueobotánica, Paisaje
Producción de alimentos
Arqueobotánica
Paisaje
title_short Why should the sambaqui society be considered as middle ground?
title_full Why should the sambaqui society be considered as middle ground?
title_fullStr Why should the sambaqui society be considered as middle ground?
title_full_unstemmed Why should the sambaqui society be considered as middle ground?
title_sort Why should the sambaqui society be considered as middle ground?
author Scheel-Ybert, Rita
author_facet Scheel-Ybert, Rita
Boyadjian, Célia
Capucho, Taís
author_role author
author2 Boyadjian, Célia
Capucho, Taís
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Scheel-Ybert, Rita
Boyadjian, Célia
Capucho, Taís
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Produção de alimentos
Arqueobotânica
Paisagem
Food production
Archaeobotany
Landscape
Producción de alimentos; Arqueobotánica, Paisaje
Producción de alimentos
Arqueobotánica
Paisaje
topic Produção de alimentos
Arqueobotânica
Paisagem
Food production
Archaeobotany
Landscape
Producción de alimentos; Arqueobotánica, Paisaje
Producción de alimentos
Arqueobotánica
Paisaje
description   Studies from the last two decades show the importance of plants for sambaqui builders, recently indicating a mixed-economy system, in which fishing and gathering may have been combined with horticulture. Nevertheless, fishing and animal protein intake are still considered key within their social and economic spheres, while the importance of plants remains underestimated. The relevance of plants to the sambaqui people is demonstrated through remains which are less conspicuous than the animal remains, but of no less importance. Here we discuss the position of these groups as “middle ground societies”. This concept describes a great variety of ways of life that do not fit the outdated “foragers versus farmers” dichotomy and which were more common and longer-lasting than previously thought.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.sabnet.org/ojs/index.php/sab/article/view/995
10.24885/sab.v35i3.995
url https://revista.sabnet.org/ojs/index.php/sab/article/view/995
identifier_str_mv 10.24885/sab.v35i3.995
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.sabnet.org/ojs/index.php/sab/article/view/995/816
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Rita Scheel-Ybert, Célia Boyadjian, Taís Capucho
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Rita Scheel-Ybert, Célia Boyadjian, Taís Capucho
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Arqueologia Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Arqueologia Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Arqueologia; Vol. 35 No. 3 (2022); 3-31
Revista de Arqueologia; Vol. 35 Núm. 3 (2022); 3-31
Revista de Arqueologia; Vol. 35 No 3 (2022); 3-31
Revista de Arqueologia; v. 35 n. 3 (2022); 3-31
1982-1999
0102-0420
10.24885/sab.v35i3
reponame:Revista de Arqueologia
instname:Sociedade de Arqueologia Brasileira (SAB)
instacron:SAB
instname_str Sociedade de Arqueologia Brasileira (SAB)
instacron_str SAB
institution SAB
reponame_str Revista de Arqueologia
collection Revista de Arqueologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Arqueologia - Sociedade de Arqueologia Brasileira (SAB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadearqueologia@gmail.com || revistasab.ojs@gmail.com
_version_ 1754639283020365824