Lung Ultrasound as a Triage Tool in an Emergency Setting during the Covid-19 Outbreak: comparison with CT Findings

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alcantara,Monica Luiza de
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: Bernardo,Marcos Paulo Lacerda, Autran,Tatiana Bagrichevsky, Lustosa,Rodolfo de Paula, Tayah,Marcelo, Chagas,Lucia Antunes, Machado,Dequitier Carvalho
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472020000500479
Summary: Abstract Background Lung ultrasound (LUS) can detect interstitial alveolar changes confined to the subpleural region, like those described in Covid-19. Objetive To evaluate how LUS findings correlate with chest computed tomography (CT) in patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) with suspicion of Covid-19. Methods Cross-sectional study of 20 patients (median age 43 years; interquartile range, 37–63 years; 50% male). All patients underwent LUS and chest CT on the day of ED admission. Each hemithorax was divided into 6 segments with similar landmarks, and equivalent scores (sc) of lesion severity were defined for both methods. The number of affected segments on LUS (LUSseg) was divided into tertiles (0-1, 2-5, and ≥6), and compared with number of affected segments on CT (CTseg), LUSsc, CTsc, and percentage of affected lung parenchyma through visual analysis (CTvis). ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables, chi-square test for categorical variables, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to define optimal cutoff points were performed. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Median LUSsc, CTsc, CTseg, and CTvis were significantly different between groups. A clear separation between groups was demonstrated; patients with <2 affected segments on LUS were defined as low risk. The ROC curve showed good discriminative power to predict ≥6 affected segments on CT, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 and 0.98 for >7 LUSsc and >3 LUSseg, respectively. Conclusion LUS findings correlate with chest CT, and can help identify patients with normal lung or minor pulmonary involvement secondary to Covid-19. Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2020; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0
id SBC-2_1a9eb38dd5e2dbabc8cbf8941b83f2b0
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2359-56472020000500479
network_acronym_str SBC-2
network_name_str International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Lung Ultrasound as a Triage Tool in an Emergency Setting during the Covid-19 Outbreak: comparison with CT FindingsLungUltrasonography/methodsTriagePandemicsCOVID-19Pulmonary AlveoliPleuraTomography, X-Ray Computed/methodsAbstract Background Lung ultrasound (LUS) can detect interstitial alveolar changes confined to the subpleural region, like those described in Covid-19. Objetive To evaluate how LUS findings correlate with chest computed tomography (CT) in patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) with suspicion of Covid-19. Methods Cross-sectional study of 20 patients (median age 43 years; interquartile range, 37–63 years; 50% male). All patients underwent LUS and chest CT on the day of ED admission. Each hemithorax was divided into 6 segments with similar landmarks, and equivalent scores (sc) of lesion severity were defined for both methods. The number of affected segments on LUS (LUSseg) was divided into tertiles (0-1, 2-5, and ≥6), and compared with number of affected segments on CT (CTseg), LUSsc, CTsc, and percentage of affected lung parenchyma through visual analysis (CTvis). ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables, chi-square test for categorical variables, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to define optimal cutoff points were performed. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Median LUSsc, CTsc, CTseg, and CTvis were significantly different between groups. A clear separation between groups was demonstrated; patients with <2 affected segments on LUS were defined as low risk. The ROC curve showed good discriminative power to predict ≥6 affected segments on CT, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 and 0.98 for >7 LUSsc and >3 LUSseg, respectively. Conclusion LUS findings correlate with chest CT, and can help identify patients with normal lung or minor pulmonary involvement secondary to Covid-19. Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2020; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia2020-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472020000500479International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences v.33 n.5 2020reponame:International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)instacron:SBC10.36660/ijcs.20200133info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlcantara,Monica Luiza deBernardo,Marcos Paulo LacerdaAutran,Tatiana BagrichevskyLustosa,Rodolfo de PaulaTayah,MarceloChagas,Lucia AntunesMachado,Dequitier Carvalhoeng2020-11-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2359-56472020000500479Revistahttp://publicacoes.cardiol.br/portal/ijcshttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptailanerodrigues@cardiol.br||revistaijcs@cardiol.br2359-56472359-4802opendoar:2020-11-23T00:00International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Lung Ultrasound as a Triage Tool in an Emergency Setting during the Covid-19 Outbreak: comparison with CT Findings
title Lung Ultrasound as a Triage Tool in an Emergency Setting during the Covid-19 Outbreak: comparison with CT Findings
spellingShingle Lung Ultrasound as a Triage Tool in an Emergency Setting during the Covid-19 Outbreak: comparison with CT Findings
Alcantara,Monica Luiza de
Lung
Ultrasonography/methods
Triage
Pandemics
COVID-19
Pulmonary Alveoli
Pleura
Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
title_short Lung Ultrasound as a Triage Tool in an Emergency Setting during the Covid-19 Outbreak: comparison with CT Findings
title_full Lung Ultrasound as a Triage Tool in an Emergency Setting during the Covid-19 Outbreak: comparison with CT Findings
title_fullStr Lung Ultrasound as a Triage Tool in an Emergency Setting during the Covid-19 Outbreak: comparison with CT Findings
title_full_unstemmed Lung Ultrasound as a Triage Tool in an Emergency Setting during the Covid-19 Outbreak: comparison with CT Findings
title_sort Lung Ultrasound as a Triage Tool in an Emergency Setting during the Covid-19 Outbreak: comparison with CT Findings
author Alcantara,Monica Luiza de
author_facet Alcantara,Monica Luiza de
Bernardo,Marcos Paulo Lacerda
Autran,Tatiana Bagrichevsky
Lustosa,Rodolfo de Paula
Tayah,Marcelo
Chagas,Lucia Antunes
Machado,Dequitier Carvalho
author_role author
author2 Bernardo,Marcos Paulo Lacerda
Autran,Tatiana Bagrichevsky
Lustosa,Rodolfo de Paula
Tayah,Marcelo
Chagas,Lucia Antunes
Machado,Dequitier Carvalho
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alcantara,Monica Luiza de
Bernardo,Marcos Paulo Lacerda
Autran,Tatiana Bagrichevsky
Lustosa,Rodolfo de Paula
Tayah,Marcelo
Chagas,Lucia Antunes
Machado,Dequitier Carvalho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Lung
Ultrasonography/methods
Triage
Pandemics
COVID-19
Pulmonary Alveoli
Pleura
Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
topic Lung
Ultrasonography/methods
Triage
Pandemics
COVID-19
Pulmonary Alveoli
Pleura
Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
description Abstract Background Lung ultrasound (LUS) can detect interstitial alveolar changes confined to the subpleural region, like those described in Covid-19. Objetive To evaluate how LUS findings correlate with chest computed tomography (CT) in patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) with suspicion of Covid-19. Methods Cross-sectional study of 20 patients (median age 43 years; interquartile range, 37–63 years; 50% male). All patients underwent LUS and chest CT on the day of ED admission. Each hemithorax was divided into 6 segments with similar landmarks, and equivalent scores (sc) of lesion severity were defined for both methods. The number of affected segments on LUS (LUSseg) was divided into tertiles (0-1, 2-5, and ≥6), and compared with number of affected segments on CT (CTseg), LUSsc, CTsc, and percentage of affected lung parenchyma through visual analysis (CTvis). ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables, chi-square test for categorical variables, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to define optimal cutoff points were performed. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Median LUSsc, CTsc, CTseg, and CTvis were significantly different between groups. A clear separation between groups was demonstrated; patients with <2 affected segments on LUS were defined as low risk. The ROC curve showed good discriminative power to predict ≥6 affected segments on CT, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 and 0.98 for >7 LUSsc and >3 LUSseg, respectively. Conclusion LUS findings correlate with chest CT, and can help identify patients with normal lung or minor pulmonary involvement secondary to Covid-19. Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2020; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472020000500479
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472020000500479
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.36660/ijcs.20200133
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences v.33 n.5 2020
reponame:International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron:SBC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron_str SBC
institution SBC
reponame_str International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
collection International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tailanerodrigues@cardiol.br||revistaijcs@cardiol.br
_version_ 1754732626580602880