Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Reis,Ana Paula Paz
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ruschel,Karen Brasil, Moraes,Maria Antonieta P. de, Belli,Karlyse, Saffi,Marco Lumertz, Fagundes,Jaqueline Eilert
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472021000100067
Resumo: Abstract Background The implementation of institutional protocols in the emergency department (ED) for risk stratification in patients with chest pain has been recommended. Objective To assess the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of an institutional risk stratification protocol for chest pain suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Method Cross-sectional study conducted based on the computerized records of patients treated with the use of a chest pain protocol adapted from the Manchester protocol. The level of risk was stratified by applying five colors representing the respective levels. Each color represents a level of severity and a maximum waiting time for receiving medical care. Red and orange were considered to be high priority, while patients with yellow, green or blue indications were considered to represent a low priority. To compare the type of diagnosis and the classification of priority for receiving care, the Pearson's chi-square test was used, considering a significance level of p< 0.05 for all tests. Results The records of 1,074 patients admitted to the cardiology ED were analyzed. Men (54%), with a mean age of 60 ± 15 years, with complaints of chest pain (44%) of moderate intensity (80%) were predominant the study. Of these patients, 19% were classified as high priority, while 81% were considered to represent a low priority. ACS was confirmed in 23% of the patients, with 34% of them being classified as high priority and 66% as low priority. The sensitivity of the risk stratification protocol for chest pain was 33.7% and the specificity was 86.0%, with a positive and negative predictive value of 41.7% and 81.3%, respectively. Conclusion The Institutional risk stratification protocol for chest pain suggestive of ACS presented satisfactory specificity and a low degree of sensitivity. Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2020; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0
id SBC-2_b752d5e6b846a3fc6e423dd7da2fe9cb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2359-56472021000100067
network_acronym_str SBC-2
network_name_str International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary SyndromeChest PainAcute Coronary SyndromeRisk FactorsRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecifityEmergency Medical ServicesAbstract Background The implementation of institutional protocols in the emergency department (ED) for risk stratification in patients with chest pain has been recommended. Objective To assess the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of an institutional risk stratification protocol for chest pain suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Method Cross-sectional study conducted based on the computerized records of patients treated with the use of a chest pain protocol adapted from the Manchester protocol. The level of risk was stratified by applying five colors representing the respective levels. Each color represents a level of severity and a maximum waiting time for receiving medical care. Red and orange were considered to be high priority, while patients with yellow, green or blue indications were considered to represent a low priority. To compare the type of diagnosis and the classification of priority for receiving care, the Pearson's chi-square test was used, considering a significance level of p< 0.05 for all tests. Results The records of 1,074 patients admitted to the cardiology ED were analyzed. Men (54%), with a mean age of 60 ± 15 years, with complaints of chest pain (44%) of moderate intensity (80%) were predominant the study. Of these patients, 19% were classified as high priority, while 81% were considered to represent a low priority. ACS was confirmed in 23% of the patients, with 34% of them being classified as high priority and 66% as low priority. The sensitivity of the risk stratification protocol for chest pain was 33.7% and the specificity was 86.0%, with a positive and negative predictive value of 41.7% and 81.3%, respectively. Conclusion The Institutional risk stratification protocol for chest pain suggestive of ACS presented satisfactory specificity and a low degree of sensitivity. Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2020; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia2021-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472021000100067International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences v.34 n.1 2021reponame:International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)instacron:SBC10.36660/ijcs.20190178info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessReis,Ana Paula PazRuschel,Karen BrasilMoraes,Maria Antonieta P. deBelli,KarlyseSaffi,Marco LumertzFagundes,Jaqueline Eilerteng2022-02-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2359-56472021000100067Revistahttp://publicacoes.cardiol.br/portal/ijcshttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phptailanerodrigues@cardiol.br||revistaijcs@cardiol.br2359-56472359-4802opendoar:2022-02-02T00:00International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome
title Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome
spellingShingle Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome
Reis,Ana Paula Paz
Chest Pain
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Risk Factors
Risk Assessment
Sensitivity and Specifity
Emergency Medical Services
title_short Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_full Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_fullStr Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_sort Risk Stratification in Chest Pain: Impact on the Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome
author Reis,Ana Paula Paz
author_facet Reis,Ana Paula Paz
Ruschel,Karen Brasil
Moraes,Maria Antonieta P. de
Belli,Karlyse
Saffi,Marco Lumertz
Fagundes,Jaqueline Eilert
author_role author
author2 Ruschel,Karen Brasil
Moraes,Maria Antonieta P. de
Belli,Karlyse
Saffi,Marco Lumertz
Fagundes,Jaqueline Eilert
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reis,Ana Paula Paz
Ruschel,Karen Brasil
Moraes,Maria Antonieta P. de
Belli,Karlyse
Saffi,Marco Lumertz
Fagundes,Jaqueline Eilert
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chest Pain
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Risk Factors
Risk Assessment
Sensitivity and Specifity
Emergency Medical Services
topic Chest Pain
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Risk Factors
Risk Assessment
Sensitivity and Specifity
Emergency Medical Services
description Abstract Background The implementation of institutional protocols in the emergency department (ED) for risk stratification in patients with chest pain has been recommended. Objective To assess the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of an institutional risk stratification protocol for chest pain suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Method Cross-sectional study conducted based on the computerized records of patients treated with the use of a chest pain protocol adapted from the Manchester protocol. The level of risk was stratified by applying five colors representing the respective levels. Each color represents a level of severity and a maximum waiting time for receiving medical care. Red and orange were considered to be high priority, while patients with yellow, green or blue indications were considered to represent a low priority. To compare the type of diagnosis and the classification of priority for receiving care, the Pearson's chi-square test was used, considering a significance level of p< 0.05 for all tests. Results The records of 1,074 patients admitted to the cardiology ED were analyzed. Men (54%), with a mean age of 60 ± 15 years, with complaints of chest pain (44%) of moderate intensity (80%) were predominant the study. Of these patients, 19% were classified as high priority, while 81% were considered to represent a low priority. ACS was confirmed in 23% of the patients, with 34% of them being classified as high priority and 66% as low priority. The sensitivity of the risk stratification protocol for chest pain was 33.7% and the specificity was 86.0%, with a positive and negative predictive value of 41.7% and 81.3%, respectively. Conclusion The Institutional risk stratification protocol for chest pain suggestive of ACS presented satisfactory specificity and a low degree of sensitivity. Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2020; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472021000100067
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472021000100067
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.36660/ijcs.20190178
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences v.34 n.1 2021
reponame:International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron:SBC
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
instacron_str SBC
institution SBC
reponame_str International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
collection International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tailanerodrigues@cardiol.br||revistaijcs@cardiol.br
_version_ 1754732626633031680