Comparison study of two different patient-controlled anesthesia regiments after cardiac surgery

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mota,Fabiane Almeida
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Marcolan,João Fernando, Pereira,Mara Helena Corso, Milanez,Adriano Márcio de Melo, Dallan,Luis Alberto Oliveira, Diccini,Solange
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382010000100011
Resumo: INTRODUCTION: Acute and severe pain is frequent in patients who undergo cardiothoracic surgery. Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) can be used to manage postoperative pain. OBJECTIVE: To compare analgesia of morphine PCA alone (without continous infusion) with morphine PCA plus a continuous infusion on postoperative period after cardiac surgery and to evaluate pain scores, morphine consumption, number of demand, patient satisfaction and side effects. METHODS: Randomized trial was conducted to assess patients who underwent cardiac surgery receiving either morphine PCA alone or morphine PCA plus continous infusion. In the post operative period, PCA was started at extubation in both regiments according to randomization. Pain intensity, morphine consumption, number of demand, satisfaction and side effects were assessed at zero, six, twelve, eighteen, twenty four and thirty hours after patients' extubation. RESULTS: The study enrolled 100 patients. 50 patients received morphine PCA alone, (Group A) and 50 patients received morphine PCA plus a background infusion, (Group B). Group B patients had less demand, consumed more morphine and were more satisfied regarding analgesia. No statistical differences were shown between groups related to pain intensity, and side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Pain control was effective and similar in both groups. Morphine PCA alone seems to be better for postoperative pain manage in cardiac surgery, due to its less morphine expense with the same effectiveness.
id SBCCV-1_4e7eb3514c9bc1c534e46969f67f7921
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-76382010000100011
network_acronym_str SBCCV-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison study of two different patient-controlled anesthesia regiments after cardiac surgeryAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledCardiovascular surgical proceduresPostoperative careINTRODUCTION: Acute and severe pain is frequent in patients who undergo cardiothoracic surgery. Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) can be used to manage postoperative pain. OBJECTIVE: To compare analgesia of morphine PCA alone (without continous infusion) with morphine PCA plus a continuous infusion on postoperative period after cardiac surgery and to evaluate pain scores, morphine consumption, number of demand, patient satisfaction and side effects. METHODS: Randomized trial was conducted to assess patients who underwent cardiac surgery receiving either morphine PCA alone or morphine PCA plus continous infusion. In the post operative period, PCA was started at extubation in both regiments according to randomization. Pain intensity, morphine consumption, number of demand, satisfaction and side effects were assessed at zero, six, twelve, eighteen, twenty four and thirty hours after patients' extubation. RESULTS: The study enrolled 100 patients. 50 patients received morphine PCA alone, (Group A) and 50 patients received morphine PCA plus a background infusion, (Group B). Group B patients had less demand, consumed more morphine and were more satisfied regarding analgesia. No statistical differences were shown between groups related to pain intensity, and side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Pain control was effective and similar in both groups. Morphine PCA alone seems to be better for postoperative pain manage in cardiac surgery, due to its less morphine expense with the same effectiveness.Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular2010-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382010000100011Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.25 n.1 2010reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)instacron:SBCCV10.1590/S0102-76382010000100011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMota,Fabiane AlmeidaMarcolan,João FernandoPereira,Mara Helena CorsoMilanez,Adriano Márcio de MeloDallan,Luis Alberto OliveiraDiccini,Solangeeng2010-07-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-76382010000100011Revistahttp://www.rbccv.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br1678-97410102-7638opendoar:2010-07-19T00:00Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison study of two different patient-controlled anesthesia regiments after cardiac surgery
title Comparison study of two different patient-controlled anesthesia regiments after cardiac surgery
spellingShingle Comparison study of two different patient-controlled anesthesia regiments after cardiac surgery
Mota,Fabiane Almeida
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled
Cardiovascular surgical procedures
Postoperative care
title_short Comparison study of two different patient-controlled anesthesia regiments after cardiac surgery
title_full Comparison study of two different patient-controlled anesthesia regiments after cardiac surgery
title_fullStr Comparison study of two different patient-controlled anesthesia regiments after cardiac surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison study of two different patient-controlled anesthesia regiments after cardiac surgery
title_sort Comparison study of two different patient-controlled anesthesia regiments after cardiac surgery
author Mota,Fabiane Almeida
author_facet Mota,Fabiane Almeida
Marcolan,João Fernando
Pereira,Mara Helena Corso
Milanez,Adriano Márcio de Melo
Dallan,Luis Alberto Oliveira
Diccini,Solange
author_role author
author2 Marcolan,João Fernando
Pereira,Mara Helena Corso
Milanez,Adriano Márcio de Melo
Dallan,Luis Alberto Oliveira
Diccini,Solange
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mota,Fabiane Almeida
Marcolan,João Fernando
Pereira,Mara Helena Corso
Milanez,Adriano Márcio de Melo
Dallan,Luis Alberto Oliveira
Diccini,Solange
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Analgesia, Patient-Controlled
Cardiovascular surgical procedures
Postoperative care
topic Analgesia, Patient-Controlled
Cardiovascular surgical procedures
Postoperative care
description INTRODUCTION: Acute and severe pain is frequent in patients who undergo cardiothoracic surgery. Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) can be used to manage postoperative pain. OBJECTIVE: To compare analgesia of morphine PCA alone (without continous infusion) with morphine PCA plus a continuous infusion on postoperative period after cardiac surgery and to evaluate pain scores, morphine consumption, number of demand, patient satisfaction and side effects. METHODS: Randomized trial was conducted to assess patients who underwent cardiac surgery receiving either morphine PCA alone or morphine PCA plus continous infusion. In the post operative period, PCA was started at extubation in both regiments according to randomization. Pain intensity, morphine consumption, number of demand, satisfaction and side effects were assessed at zero, six, twelve, eighteen, twenty four and thirty hours after patients' extubation. RESULTS: The study enrolled 100 patients. 50 patients received morphine PCA alone, (Group A) and 50 patients received morphine PCA plus a background infusion, (Group B). Group B patients had less demand, consumed more morphine and were more satisfied regarding analgesia. No statistical differences were shown between groups related to pain intensity, and side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Pain control was effective and similar in both groups. Morphine PCA alone seems to be better for postoperative pain manage in cardiac surgery, due to its less morphine expense with the same effectiveness.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382010000100011
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382010000100011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0102-76382010000100011
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.25 n.1 2010
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron:SBCCV
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron_str SBCCV
institution SBCCV
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br
_version_ 1752126597099421696