Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Areias,Guilherme de Souza
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Santiago,Luan Rodrigues, Teixeira,Daniel Sobral, Reis,Michel Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382020000400011
Resumo: Abstract Objective: To verify the concurrent validity between the inspiratory muscle strength (IMS) values obtained in static (maximal inspiratory pressure [MIP]) and dynamic (S-Index) assessments. Methods: Healthy individuals were submitted to two periods of evaluation: i) MIP, static maneuver to obtain IMS, determined by the Mueller’s maneuver from residual volume (RV) until total lung capacity (TLC); ii) and S-Index, inspiration against open airway starting from RV until TLC. Both measures were performed by the same evaluator and the subjects received the same instructions. Isolated maneuvers with differences < 10% were considered as reproducible measures. Results: Data from 45 subjects (21 males) were analyzed and that showed statistical difference between MIP and S-Index values (133.5 ± 33.3 and 125.6 ± 32.2 in cmH2O, respectively), with P=0.014. Linear regression showed r2=0.54 and S-Index prediction formula = 39.8+(0.75×MIP). Pearson’s correlation demonstrated a strong and significant association between the measures with r=0.74. The measurements showed good concordance evidenced by the Bland-Altman test. Conclusion: S-Index and MIP do not present similar values since they are evaluations of different events of the muscular contraction. However, they have a strong correlation and good agreement, which indicate that both are able to evaluate the IMS of healthy individuals.
id SBCCV-1_f89625819b4d9e416715c5dc1a4a930a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-76382020000400011
network_acronym_str SBCCV-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-IndexResidual VolumeMaximal Respiratory PressuresLinear ModelsTotal Lung CapacityMuscle StrengthMuscle ContractionAbstract Objective: To verify the concurrent validity between the inspiratory muscle strength (IMS) values obtained in static (maximal inspiratory pressure [MIP]) and dynamic (S-Index) assessments. Methods: Healthy individuals were submitted to two periods of evaluation: i) MIP, static maneuver to obtain IMS, determined by the Mueller’s maneuver from residual volume (RV) until total lung capacity (TLC); ii) and S-Index, inspiration against open airway starting from RV until TLC. Both measures were performed by the same evaluator and the subjects received the same instructions. Isolated maneuvers with differences < 10% were considered as reproducible measures. Results: Data from 45 subjects (21 males) were analyzed and that showed statistical difference between MIP and S-Index values (133.5 ± 33.3 and 125.6 ± 32.2 in cmH2O, respectively), with P=0.014. Linear regression showed r2=0.54 and S-Index prediction formula = 39.8+(0.75×MIP). Pearson’s correlation demonstrated a strong and significant association between the measures with r=0.74. The measurements showed good concordance evidenced by the Bland-Altman test. Conclusion: S-Index and MIP do not present similar values since they are evaluations of different events of the muscular contraction. However, they have a strong correlation and good agreement, which indicate that both are able to evaluate the IMS of healthy individuals.Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular2020-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382020000400011Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.35 n.4 2020reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)instacron:SBCCV10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0269info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAreias,Guilherme de SouzaSantiago,Luan RodriguesTeixeira,Daniel SobralReis,Michel Silvaeng2020-08-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-76382020000400011Revistahttp://www.rbccv.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br1678-97410102-7638opendoar:2020-08-12T00:00Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index
title Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index
spellingShingle Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index
Areias,Guilherme de Souza
Residual Volume
Maximal Respiratory Pressures
Linear Models
Total Lung Capacity
Muscle Strength
Muscle Contraction
title_short Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index
title_full Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index
title_fullStr Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index
title_sort Concurrent Validity of the Static and Dynamic Measures of Inspiratory Muscle Strength: Comparison between Maximal Inspiratory Pressure and S-Index
author Areias,Guilherme de Souza
author_facet Areias,Guilherme de Souza
Santiago,Luan Rodrigues
Teixeira,Daniel Sobral
Reis,Michel Silva
author_role author
author2 Santiago,Luan Rodrigues
Teixeira,Daniel Sobral
Reis,Michel Silva
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Areias,Guilherme de Souza
Santiago,Luan Rodrigues
Teixeira,Daniel Sobral
Reis,Michel Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Residual Volume
Maximal Respiratory Pressures
Linear Models
Total Lung Capacity
Muscle Strength
Muscle Contraction
topic Residual Volume
Maximal Respiratory Pressures
Linear Models
Total Lung Capacity
Muscle Strength
Muscle Contraction
description Abstract Objective: To verify the concurrent validity between the inspiratory muscle strength (IMS) values obtained in static (maximal inspiratory pressure [MIP]) and dynamic (S-Index) assessments. Methods: Healthy individuals were submitted to two periods of evaluation: i) MIP, static maneuver to obtain IMS, determined by the Mueller’s maneuver from residual volume (RV) until total lung capacity (TLC); ii) and S-Index, inspiration against open airway starting from RV until TLC. Both measures were performed by the same evaluator and the subjects received the same instructions. Isolated maneuvers with differences < 10% were considered as reproducible measures. Results: Data from 45 subjects (21 males) were analyzed and that showed statistical difference between MIP and S-Index values (133.5 ± 33.3 and 125.6 ± 32.2 in cmH2O, respectively), with P=0.014. Linear regression showed r2=0.54 and S-Index prediction formula = 39.8+(0.75×MIP). Pearson’s correlation demonstrated a strong and significant association between the measures with r=0.74. The measurements showed good concordance evidenced by the Bland-Altman test. Conclusion: S-Index and MIP do not present similar values since they are evaluations of different events of the muscular contraction. However, they have a strong correlation and good agreement, which indicate that both are able to evaluate the IMS of healthy individuals.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382020000400011
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382020000400011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0269
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.35 n.4 2020
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron:SBCCV
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron_str SBCCV
institution SBCCV
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br
_version_ 1752126601703718912