NONOPERATIVE VERSUS OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Corredor,Jose Alfredo
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Araújo,Fernando Flores de, Mendonça,Rodrigo Góes de, Foni,Noel Oizerovici, Astur,Nelson, Gotfryd,Alberto Ofenheim, Umeta,Ricardo Shigueaki Galhego, Caffaro,Maria Fernanda Silber, Avanzi,Osmar, Meves,Robert
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000100033
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate clinical and functional results of patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with operatively or nonoperatively. Methods: Patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated either nonoperatively or operatively from 2004 to 2014 were selected from databases and a cross-sectional evaluation was performed. Outcome measures included back and leg visual analogue scales (VAS), Fischgrund criteria, Short Form-36 (SF-36) function score, and the modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results: 43 patients were evaluated: 20 with nonoperative treatment and 23 with operative treatment. Baseline characteristics were similar without significant differences between groups. Mean follow-up time was 43 months (range 10 - 72) for the nonoperative group and 36 months (range 6-80) for the operative group. Significant statistical difference in favor of operative group were found in back VAS (mean 4 versus 8, p = 0.000), leg VAS (mean 3 versus 6, p = 0.0015), SF-36 function score (mean 77 versus 35, p = 0.000), and ODI (mean 17 versus 46, p = 0.000). On the basis of the Fischgrund criteria, only 10 % of patients reported excellent or good health post nonoperative treatment versus 83% for those treated operatively (p = 0.000). Conclusion: In this cross-sectional study, we observed that symptomatic patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent operative treatment have superior clinical and functional scores compared to those that underwent nonoperative treatment.
id SBCO-1_0155bc093f7f050e5e35def5cd66fca4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-18512016000100033
network_acronym_str SBCO-1
network_name_str Coluna/Columna
repository_id_str
spelling NONOPERATIVE VERSUS OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESISVisual analog scaleDegenerative spondylolisthesisSpine fusionSpinal canal stenosisSF-36SurgeryNonoperative treatmentlumbar spineIntervertebral disc degeneration.ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate clinical and functional results of patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with operatively or nonoperatively. Methods: Patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated either nonoperatively or operatively from 2004 to 2014 were selected from databases and a cross-sectional evaluation was performed. Outcome measures included back and leg visual analogue scales (VAS), Fischgrund criteria, Short Form-36 (SF-36) function score, and the modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results: 43 patients were evaluated: 20 with nonoperative treatment and 23 with operative treatment. Baseline characteristics were similar without significant differences between groups. Mean follow-up time was 43 months (range 10 - 72) for the nonoperative group and 36 months (range 6-80) for the operative group. Significant statistical difference in favor of operative group were found in back VAS (mean 4 versus 8, p = 0.000), leg VAS (mean 3 versus 6, p = 0.0015), SF-36 function score (mean 77 versus 35, p = 0.000), and ODI (mean 17 versus 46, p = 0.000). On the basis of the Fischgrund criteria, only 10 % of patients reported excellent or good health post nonoperative treatment versus 83% for those treated operatively (p = 0.000). Conclusion: In this cross-sectional study, we observed that symptomatic patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent operative treatment have superior clinical and functional scores compared to those that underwent nonoperative treatment.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2016-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000100033Coluna/Columna v.15 n.1 2016reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/S1808-185120161501153514info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCorredor,Jose AlfredoAraújo,Fernando Flores deMendonça,Rodrigo Góes deFoni,Noel OizeroviciAstur,NelsonGotfryd,Alberto OfenheimUmeta,Ricardo Shigueaki GalhegoCaffaro,Maria Fernanda SilberAvanzi,OsmarMeves,Roberteng2016-09-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512016000100033Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2016-09-15T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv NONOPERATIVE VERSUS OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
title NONOPERATIVE VERSUS OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
spellingShingle NONOPERATIVE VERSUS OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
Corredor,Jose Alfredo
Visual analog scale
Degenerative spondylolisthesis
Spine fusion
Spinal canal stenosis
SF-36
Surgery
Nonoperative treatment
lumbar spine
Intervertebral disc degeneration.
title_short NONOPERATIVE VERSUS OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
title_full NONOPERATIVE VERSUS OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
title_fullStr NONOPERATIVE VERSUS OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
title_full_unstemmed NONOPERATIVE VERSUS OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
title_sort NONOPERATIVE VERSUS OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
author Corredor,Jose Alfredo
author_facet Corredor,Jose Alfredo
Araújo,Fernando Flores de
Mendonça,Rodrigo Góes de
Foni,Noel Oizerovici
Astur,Nelson
Gotfryd,Alberto Ofenheim
Umeta,Ricardo Shigueaki Galhego
Caffaro,Maria Fernanda Silber
Avanzi,Osmar
Meves,Robert
author_role author
author2 Araújo,Fernando Flores de
Mendonça,Rodrigo Góes de
Foni,Noel Oizerovici
Astur,Nelson
Gotfryd,Alberto Ofenheim
Umeta,Ricardo Shigueaki Galhego
Caffaro,Maria Fernanda Silber
Avanzi,Osmar
Meves,Robert
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Corredor,Jose Alfredo
Araújo,Fernando Flores de
Mendonça,Rodrigo Góes de
Foni,Noel Oizerovici
Astur,Nelson
Gotfryd,Alberto Ofenheim
Umeta,Ricardo Shigueaki Galhego
Caffaro,Maria Fernanda Silber
Avanzi,Osmar
Meves,Robert
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Visual analog scale
Degenerative spondylolisthesis
Spine fusion
Spinal canal stenosis
SF-36
Surgery
Nonoperative treatment
lumbar spine
Intervertebral disc degeneration.
topic Visual analog scale
Degenerative spondylolisthesis
Spine fusion
Spinal canal stenosis
SF-36
Surgery
Nonoperative treatment
lumbar spine
Intervertebral disc degeneration.
description ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate clinical and functional results of patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with operatively or nonoperatively. Methods: Patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated either nonoperatively or operatively from 2004 to 2014 were selected from databases and a cross-sectional evaluation was performed. Outcome measures included back and leg visual analogue scales (VAS), Fischgrund criteria, Short Form-36 (SF-36) function score, and the modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results: 43 patients were evaluated: 20 with nonoperative treatment and 23 with operative treatment. Baseline characteristics were similar without significant differences between groups. Mean follow-up time was 43 months (range 10 - 72) for the nonoperative group and 36 months (range 6-80) for the operative group. Significant statistical difference in favor of operative group were found in back VAS (mean 4 versus 8, p = 0.000), leg VAS (mean 3 versus 6, p = 0.0015), SF-36 function score (mean 77 versus 35, p = 0.000), and ODI (mean 17 versus 46, p = 0.000). On the basis of the Fischgrund criteria, only 10 % of patients reported excellent or good health post nonoperative treatment versus 83% for those treated operatively (p = 0.000). Conclusion: In this cross-sectional study, we observed that symptomatic patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent operative treatment have superior clinical and functional scores compared to those that underwent nonoperative treatment.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000100033
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512016000100033
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1808-185120161501153514
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna v.15 n.1 2016
reponame:Coluna/Columna
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron:SBCO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron_str SBCO
institution SBCO
reponame_str Coluna/Columna
collection Coluna/Columna
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752126615140171776