IS QUALITY OF LIFE WORSE IN PATIENTS WITH ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS WHO UNDERGO LONGER FUSIONS? 2 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chaves Filho,Amauri
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Quaggiotto,Jeinnifer Zanardo, Zanon,Igor de Barcellos, Batista Júnior,José lucas, Cardoso,Igor Machado, Jacob Júnior,Charbel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512022000200206
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To compare quality of life in patients with longer fusions with that of those who have short fusions 2 years of after surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective comparative cohort study (Level of Evidence III) involving patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screws with a 2-year follow-up. The primary outcome was quality of life assessed using the SRS-30 questionnaire. Participants were divided according to Lenke and stratified into those with major (Lenke 3 and Lenke 6) and minor (Lenke 1 and Lenke 5) fusions. Results: Forty-one patients, 34 of whom were women, were evaluated: Lenke 1 (17 patients), Lenke 3 (15 patients), Lenke 5 (3 patients), and Lenke 6 (6 patients). The mean age was 13.8 years, the mean preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles were 56.48 degrees and 10.49 degrees, respectively, and the mean surgical Cobb reduction was 45.54 degrees. All patients in the sample showed an overall improvement in quality of life after surgery (p<0.0001). There was no difference between groups A (long fusions) and B (short fusions) in relation to the domains in general (p>0.05). Although pain was improved in the overall sample, this was not the case for the group with structured double curves and longer fusions (p = 0.03). Conclusion: There was no difference in quality of life between patients with long and short fusions with a 2-year follow-up. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective cohort.
id SBCO-1_8c5ac53e8aa867fea27249dae1a57766
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-18512022000200206
network_acronym_str SBCO-1
network_name_str Coluna/Columna
repository_id_str
spelling IS QUALITY OF LIFE WORSE IN PATIENTS WITH ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS WHO UNDERGO LONGER FUSIONS? 2 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UPQuality of LifeScoliosisArthrodesisSpinal FusionABSTRACT Objective: To compare quality of life in patients with longer fusions with that of those who have short fusions 2 years of after surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective comparative cohort study (Level of Evidence III) involving patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screws with a 2-year follow-up. The primary outcome was quality of life assessed using the SRS-30 questionnaire. Participants were divided according to Lenke and stratified into those with major (Lenke 3 and Lenke 6) and minor (Lenke 1 and Lenke 5) fusions. Results: Forty-one patients, 34 of whom were women, were evaluated: Lenke 1 (17 patients), Lenke 3 (15 patients), Lenke 5 (3 patients), and Lenke 6 (6 patients). The mean age was 13.8 years, the mean preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles were 56.48 degrees and 10.49 degrees, respectively, and the mean surgical Cobb reduction was 45.54 degrees. All patients in the sample showed an overall improvement in quality of life after surgery (p<0.0001). There was no difference between groups A (long fusions) and B (short fusions) in relation to the domains in general (p>0.05). Although pain was improved in the overall sample, this was not the case for the group with structured double curves and longer fusions (p = 0.03). Conclusion: There was no difference in quality of life between patients with long and short fusions with a 2-year follow-up. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective cohort.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512022000200206Coluna/Columna v.21 n.2 2022reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/s1808-185120222102261930info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChaves Filho,AmauriQuaggiotto,Jeinnifer ZanardoZanon,Igor de BarcellosBatista Júnior,José lucasCardoso,Igor MachadoJacob Júnior,Charbeleng2022-07-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512022000200206Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2022-07-20T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv IS QUALITY OF LIFE WORSE IN PATIENTS WITH ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS WHO UNDERGO LONGER FUSIONS? 2 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP
title IS QUALITY OF LIFE WORSE IN PATIENTS WITH ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS WHO UNDERGO LONGER FUSIONS? 2 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP
spellingShingle IS QUALITY OF LIFE WORSE IN PATIENTS WITH ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS WHO UNDERGO LONGER FUSIONS? 2 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP
Chaves Filho,Amauri
Quality of Life
Scoliosis
Arthrodesis
Spinal Fusion
title_short IS QUALITY OF LIFE WORSE IN PATIENTS WITH ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS WHO UNDERGO LONGER FUSIONS? 2 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP
title_full IS QUALITY OF LIFE WORSE IN PATIENTS WITH ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS WHO UNDERGO LONGER FUSIONS? 2 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP
title_fullStr IS QUALITY OF LIFE WORSE IN PATIENTS WITH ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS WHO UNDERGO LONGER FUSIONS? 2 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP
title_full_unstemmed IS QUALITY OF LIFE WORSE IN PATIENTS WITH ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS WHO UNDERGO LONGER FUSIONS? 2 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP
title_sort IS QUALITY OF LIFE WORSE IN PATIENTS WITH ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS WHO UNDERGO LONGER FUSIONS? 2 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP
author Chaves Filho,Amauri
author_facet Chaves Filho,Amauri
Quaggiotto,Jeinnifer Zanardo
Zanon,Igor de Barcellos
Batista Júnior,José lucas
Cardoso,Igor Machado
Jacob Júnior,Charbel
author_role author
author2 Quaggiotto,Jeinnifer Zanardo
Zanon,Igor de Barcellos
Batista Júnior,José lucas
Cardoso,Igor Machado
Jacob Júnior,Charbel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chaves Filho,Amauri
Quaggiotto,Jeinnifer Zanardo
Zanon,Igor de Barcellos
Batista Júnior,José lucas
Cardoso,Igor Machado
Jacob Júnior,Charbel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Quality of Life
Scoliosis
Arthrodesis
Spinal Fusion
topic Quality of Life
Scoliosis
Arthrodesis
Spinal Fusion
description ABSTRACT Objective: To compare quality of life in patients with longer fusions with that of those who have short fusions 2 years of after surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective comparative cohort study (Level of Evidence III) involving patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screws with a 2-year follow-up. The primary outcome was quality of life assessed using the SRS-30 questionnaire. Participants were divided according to Lenke and stratified into those with major (Lenke 3 and Lenke 6) and minor (Lenke 1 and Lenke 5) fusions. Results: Forty-one patients, 34 of whom were women, were evaluated: Lenke 1 (17 patients), Lenke 3 (15 patients), Lenke 5 (3 patients), and Lenke 6 (6 patients). The mean age was 13.8 years, the mean preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles were 56.48 degrees and 10.49 degrees, respectively, and the mean surgical Cobb reduction was 45.54 degrees. All patients in the sample showed an overall improvement in quality of life after surgery (p<0.0001). There was no difference between groups A (long fusions) and B (short fusions) in relation to the domains in general (p>0.05). Although pain was improved in the overall sample, this was not the case for the group with structured double curves and longer fusions (p = 0.03). Conclusion: There was no difference in quality of life between patients with long and short fusions with a 2-year follow-up. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective cohort.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512022000200206
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512022000200206
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1808-185120222102261930
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna v.21 n.2 2022
reponame:Coluna/Columna
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron:SBCO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron_str SBCO
institution SBCO
reponame_str Coluna/Columna
collection Coluna/Columna
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752126616765464576