COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: VIEIRA,ANDRÉ LUIZ PAGOTTO
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: SANTOS,JULIANO RODRIGUES DOS, HENRIQUES,GUILHERME GALITO
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Coluna/Columna
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512018000100035
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the reproducibility and the interobserver coefficient of concordance between the AO/Magerl and AOSpine classifications for thoracolumbar spine fractures. Methods: Retrospective study of radiographic data analysis. Data were collected from 31 radiographic studies of patients with thoracolumbar spine fracture and distributed to a team involving spinal surgeons and residents. The fractures were classified according to the AO/Magerl and AOSpine classifications. Statistical analysis was performed using the Cohen Kappa test to assess the coefficient of concordance. Results: The Kappa value for interobserver concordance of AO/Magerl classification was κ = 0.70 and standard deviation was 0.16. For the AOSpine classification, we observed κ = 0.76, both with significance level α = 0.05 and P<0.001. Conclusions: We conclude that the interobserver concordance of the new AOSpine classification is similar to the AO/Magerl classification. This conclusion reinforces the reproducibility of the new AOSpine classification. Level of evidence: IV,Type of Study: Case series.
id SBCO-1_e57ae7e38353dff03b8a7cd7e2335226
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-18512018000100035
network_acronym_str SBCO-1
network_name_str Coluna/Columna
repository_id_str
spelling COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURESSpineSpinal fracturesSpinal injuriesABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the reproducibility and the interobserver coefficient of concordance between the AO/Magerl and AOSpine classifications for thoracolumbar spine fractures. Methods: Retrospective study of radiographic data analysis. Data were collected from 31 radiographic studies of patients with thoracolumbar spine fracture and distributed to a team involving spinal surgeons and residents. The fractures were classified according to the AO/Magerl and AOSpine classifications. Statistical analysis was performed using the Cohen Kappa test to assess the coefficient of concordance. Results: The Kappa value for interobserver concordance of AO/Magerl classification was κ = 0.70 and standard deviation was 0.16. For the AOSpine classification, we observed κ = 0.76, both with significance level α = 0.05 and P<0.001. Conclusions: We conclude that the interobserver concordance of the new AOSpine classification is similar to the AO/Magerl classification. This conclusion reinforces the reproducibility of the new AOSpine classification. Level of evidence: IV,Type of Study: Case series.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2018-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512018000100035Coluna/Columna v.17 n.1 2018reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/s1808-185120181701179188info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVIEIRA,ANDRÉ LUIZ PAGOTTOSANTOS,JULIANO RODRIGUES DOSHENRIQUES,GUILHERME GALITOeng2018-04-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512018000100035Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2018-04-20T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES
title COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES
spellingShingle COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES
VIEIRA,ANDRÉ LUIZ PAGOTTO
Spine
Spinal fractures
Spinal injuries
title_short COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES
title_full COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES
title_fullStr COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES
title_full_unstemmed COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES
title_sort COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES
author VIEIRA,ANDRÉ LUIZ PAGOTTO
author_facet VIEIRA,ANDRÉ LUIZ PAGOTTO
SANTOS,JULIANO RODRIGUES DOS
HENRIQUES,GUILHERME GALITO
author_role author
author2 SANTOS,JULIANO RODRIGUES DOS
HENRIQUES,GUILHERME GALITO
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv VIEIRA,ANDRÉ LUIZ PAGOTTO
SANTOS,JULIANO RODRIGUES DOS
HENRIQUES,GUILHERME GALITO
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Spine
Spinal fractures
Spinal injuries
topic Spine
Spinal fractures
Spinal injuries
description ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the reproducibility and the interobserver coefficient of concordance between the AO/Magerl and AOSpine classifications for thoracolumbar spine fractures. Methods: Retrospective study of radiographic data analysis. Data were collected from 31 radiographic studies of patients with thoracolumbar spine fracture and distributed to a team involving spinal surgeons and residents. The fractures were classified according to the AO/Magerl and AOSpine classifications. Statistical analysis was performed using the Cohen Kappa test to assess the coefficient of concordance. Results: The Kappa value for interobserver concordance of AO/Magerl classification was κ = 0.70 and standard deviation was 0.16. For the AOSpine classification, we observed κ = 0.76, both with significance level α = 0.05 and P<0.001. Conclusions: We conclude that the interobserver concordance of the new AOSpine classification is similar to the AO/Magerl classification. This conclusion reinforces the reproducibility of the new AOSpine classification. Level of evidence: IV,Type of Study: Case series.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512018000100035
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512018000100035
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1808-185120181701179188
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna v.17 n.1 2018
reponame:Coluna/Columna
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron:SBCO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron_str SBCO
institution SBCO
reponame_str Coluna/Columna
collection Coluna/Columna
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752126615608885248