Corn yield response to weed and fall armyworm controls

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lima,M.S.
Publication Date: 2010
Other Authors: Silva,P.S.L., Oliveira,O.F., Silva,K.M.B., Freitas,F.C.L.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Planta daninha (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582010000100013
Summary: The interference imposed the by weeds on corn decreases practically all vegetative characteristics. As consequence, the green ear and grain yield are also reduced. Losses due to the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) attack can reduce corn grain yield up to 34%. In general, weed and insect control issues are addressed separately in research papers. Nevertheless, interaction between weeds and insects may exist. This study aimed to evaluate green ear and corn grain yield response to weed and fall armyworm control. A completely randomized block design with split-plots and five replicates was adopted. Corn cultivar AG 1051 was grown under weedy conditions or with control by hand hoeings performed at 20 and 40 days after planting. Fall armyworm control (applied to subplots) was performed with sprays of water (control), deltamethrin (5g active ingredient ha-1); neem oil, at 0.5% (diluted in water), and neem leaf extract at 5%. Each product was sprayed three times, at seven-day intervals, starting at the 7th day after planting, using 150 L ha-1 of the tank solution. Dry mass of the above-ground part, internode diameter, leaf length, leaf width, leaf area, green ear yield and grain yield of corn were reduced due to the lack of weed control. Fall armyworm control in the weeded plots did not influence green ear yield and grain yield, except green mass of marketable, husked ears, which was reduced when the caterpillar was not controlled. Without weed control, neem extracts and deltamethrin sprays provided highest yields of number and total weight of green ears with husks, number and weight of marketable ears with husks and number of marketable ears without husks. The best results for husked ear mass and for grain yield were obtained with neem extract and deltamethrin, respectively.
id SBCPD-1_60ede4a86c58382ff849d41b3a91a1fc
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-83582010000100013
network_acronym_str SBCPD-1
network_name_str Planta daninha (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Corn yield response to weed and fall armyworm controlsZea maysSpodoptera frugiperdaAzadirachta indicaweed-pest interactionThe interference imposed the by weeds on corn decreases practically all vegetative characteristics. As consequence, the green ear and grain yield are also reduced. Losses due to the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) attack can reduce corn grain yield up to 34%. In general, weed and insect control issues are addressed separately in research papers. Nevertheless, interaction between weeds and insects may exist. This study aimed to evaluate green ear and corn grain yield response to weed and fall armyworm control. A completely randomized block design with split-plots and five replicates was adopted. Corn cultivar AG 1051 was grown under weedy conditions or with control by hand hoeings performed at 20 and 40 days after planting. Fall armyworm control (applied to subplots) was performed with sprays of water (control), deltamethrin (5g active ingredient ha-1); neem oil, at 0.5% (diluted in water), and neem leaf extract at 5%. Each product was sprayed three times, at seven-day intervals, starting at the 7th day after planting, using 150 L ha-1 of the tank solution. Dry mass of the above-ground part, internode diameter, leaf length, leaf width, leaf area, green ear yield and grain yield of corn were reduced due to the lack of weed control. Fall armyworm control in the weeded plots did not influence green ear yield and grain yield, except green mass of marketable, husked ears, which was reduced when the caterpillar was not controlled. Without weed control, neem extracts and deltamethrin sprays provided highest yields of number and total weight of green ears with husks, number and weight of marketable ears with husks and number of marketable ears without husks. The best results for husked ear mass and for grain yield were obtained with neem extract and deltamethrin, respectively.Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas 2010-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582010000100013Planta Daninha v.28 n.1 2010reponame:Planta daninha (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)instacron:SBCPD10.1590/S0100-83582010000100013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima,M.S.Silva,P.S.L.Oliveira,O.F.Silva,K.M.B.Freitas,F.C.L.eng2010-04-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-83582010000100013Revistahttp://revistas.cpd.ufv.br/pdaninhaweb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rpdaninha@gmail.com1806-96810100-8358opendoar:2010-04-15T00:00Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Corn yield response to weed and fall armyworm controls
title Corn yield response to weed and fall armyworm controls
spellingShingle Corn yield response to weed and fall armyworm controls
Lima,M.S.
Zea mays
Spodoptera frugiperda
Azadirachta indica
weed-pest interaction
title_short Corn yield response to weed and fall armyworm controls
title_full Corn yield response to weed and fall armyworm controls
title_fullStr Corn yield response to weed and fall armyworm controls
title_full_unstemmed Corn yield response to weed and fall armyworm controls
title_sort Corn yield response to weed and fall armyworm controls
author Lima,M.S.
author_facet Lima,M.S.
Silva,P.S.L.
Oliveira,O.F.
Silva,K.M.B.
Freitas,F.C.L.
author_role author
author2 Silva,P.S.L.
Oliveira,O.F.
Silva,K.M.B.
Freitas,F.C.L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima,M.S.
Silva,P.S.L.
Oliveira,O.F.
Silva,K.M.B.
Freitas,F.C.L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Zea mays
Spodoptera frugiperda
Azadirachta indica
weed-pest interaction
topic Zea mays
Spodoptera frugiperda
Azadirachta indica
weed-pest interaction
description The interference imposed the by weeds on corn decreases practically all vegetative characteristics. As consequence, the green ear and grain yield are also reduced. Losses due to the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) attack can reduce corn grain yield up to 34%. In general, weed and insect control issues are addressed separately in research papers. Nevertheless, interaction between weeds and insects may exist. This study aimed to evaluate green ear and corn grain yield response to weed and fall armyworm control. A completely randomized block design with split-plots and five replicates was adopted. Corn cultivar AG 1051 was grown under weedy conditions or with control by hand hoeings performed at 20 and 40 days after planting. Fall armyworm control (applied to subplots) was performed with sprays of water (control), deltamethrin (5g active ingredient ha-1); neem oil, at 0.5% (diluted in water), and neem leaf extract at 5%. Each product was sprayed three times, at seven-day intervals, starting at the 7th day after planting, using 150 L ha-1 of the tank solution. Dry mass of the above-ground part, internode diameter, leaf length, leaf width, leaf area, green ear yield and grain yield of corn were reduced due to the lack of weed control. Fall armyworm control in the weeded plots did not influence green ear yield and grain yield, except green mass of marketable, husked ears, which was reduced when the caterpillar was not controlled. Without weed control, neem extracts and deltamethrin sprays provided highest yields of number and total weight of green ears with husks, number and weight of marketable ears with husks and number of marketable ears without husks. The best results for husked ear mass and for grain yield were obtained with neem extract and deltamethrin, respectively.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582010000100013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582010000100013
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-83582010000100013
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha v.28 n.1 2010
reponame:Planta daninha (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron:SBCPD
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron_str SBCPD
institution SBCPD
reponame_str Planta daninha (Online)
collection Planta daninha (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rpdaninha@gmail.com
_version_ 1752126492148498432