Spray nozzles, working pressures and use of adjuvant in reduction of 2,4-D herbicide spray drift

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Godinho Jr.,João D.
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: C. Vieira,Lucas, A.A. Ruas,Renato, Carvalho Filho,Alberto, R. Faria,Vinícius, I.V.G. God,Pedro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Planta daninha (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582020000100320
Resumo: Abstract Background: The study of the interactions between equipment, application methods, and spray mixtures is fundamental to optimize the application of pesticides. The determination of the best combination of these factors can reduce the drift during the application of the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). Objective: The objective this paper is to study the influence of nozzle models, working pressures, and surfactant adjuvant in reducing the drift of 2,4-D. Methods: The spectrum of nozzle drops was determined for a conventional flat jet; flat jet with air induction; double plane jet with air induction; deflector flat jet with air induction; and an empty cone with air induction at pressures of 200, 300, 400, and 500 kPa. This was quantified in a wind tunnel with four drifts: water; water + surfactant adjuvant; water + 2,4-D; and water + 2,4-D + surfactant adjuvant, applied by the five nozzle models at four working pressures. The data was evaluated by analysis of variance and, when significant, by the Tukey test and regression at 5% significance level. Results: The interactions between the nozzle models, working pressure, and spray mixture directly influenced the 2,4-D drift. Conclusions: The use of surfactant adjuvant must be carried out carefully, according to the nozzle model, working pressure, and spray mixture. The conventional single fan jet nozzle is more sensitive to increased working pressure and has a high potential to cause drift compared with the models with air induction.
id SBCPD-1_943bcb0a53fef72c750a56aaec563455
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-83582020000100320
network_acronym_str SBCPD-1
network_name_str Planta daninha (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Spray nozzles, working pressures and use of adjuvant in reduction of 2,4-D herbicide spray driftagricultural mechanizationapplication technologyquality controlair inductiondroplet sizewind tunnelAbstract Background: The study of the interactions between equipment, application methods, and spray mixtures is fundamental to optimize the application of pesticides. The determination of the best combination of these factors can reduce the drift during the application of the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). Objective: The objective this paper is to study the influence of nozzle models, working pressures, and surfactant adjuvant in reducing the drift of 2,4-D. Methods: The spectrum of nozzle drops was determined for a conventional flat jet; flat jet with air induction; double plane jet with air induction; deflector flat jet with air induction; and an empty cone with air induction at pressures of 200, 300, 400, and 500 kPa. This was quantified in a wind tunnel with four drifts: water; water + surfactant adjuvant; water + 2,4-D; and water + 2,4-D + surfactant adjuvant, applied by the five nozzle models at four working pressures. The data was evaluated by analysis of variance and, when significant, by the Tukey test and regression at 5% significance level. Results: The interactions between the nozzle models, working pressure, and spray mixture directly influenced the 2,4-D drift. Conclusions: The use of surfactant adjuvant must be carried out carefully, according to the nozzle model, working pressure, and spray mixture. The conventional single fan jet nozzle is more sensitive to increased working pressure and has a high potential to cause drift compared with the models with air induction.Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas 2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582020000100320Planta Daninha v.38 2020reponame:Planta daninha (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)instacron:SBCPD10.1590/s0100-83582020380100070info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGodinho Jr.,João D.C. Vieira,LucasA.A. Ruas,RenatoCarvalho Filho,AlbertoR. Faria,ViníciusI.V.G. God,Pedroeng2020-10-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-83582020000100320Revistahttp://revistas.cpd.ufv.br/pdaninhaweb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rpdaninha@gmail.com1806-96810100-8358opendoar:2020-10-13T00:00Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Spray nozzles, working pressures and use of adjuvant in reduction of 2,4-D herbicide spray drift
title Spray nozzles, working pressures and use of adjuvant in reduction of 2,4-D herbicide spray drift
spellingShingle Spray nozzles, working pressures and use of adjuvant in reduction of 2,4-D herbicide spray drift
Godinho Jr.,João D.
agricultural mechanization
application technology
quality control
air induction
droplet size
wind tunnel
title_short Spray nozzles, working pressures and use of adjuvant in reduction of 2,4-D herbicide spray drift
title_full Spray nozzles, working pressures and use of adjuvant in reduction of 2,4-D herbicide spray drift
title_fullStr Spray nozzles, working pressures and use of adjuvant in reduction of 2,4-D herbicide spray drift
title_full_unstemmed Spray nozzles, working pressures and use of adjuvant in reduction of 2,4-D herbicide spray drift
title_sort Spray nozzles, working pressures and use of adjuvant in reduction of 2,4-D herbicide spray drift
author Godinho Jr.,João D.
author_facet Godinho Jr.,João D.
C. Vieira,Lucas
A.A. Ruas,Renato
Carvalho Filho,Alberto
R. Faria,Vinícius
I.V.G. God,Pedro
author_role author
author2 C. Vieira,Lucas
A.A. Ruas,Renato
Carvalho Filho,Alberto
R. Faria,Vinícius
I.V.G. God,Pedro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Godinho Jr.,João D.
C. Vieira,Lucas
A.A. Ruas,Renato
Carvalho Filho,Alberto
R. Faria,Vinícius
I.V.G. God,Pedro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv agricultural mechanization
application technology
quality control
air induction
droplet size
wind tunnel
topic agricultural mechanization
application technology
quality control
air induction
droplet size
wind tunnel
description Abstract Background: The study of the interactions between equipment, application methods, and spray mixtures is fundamental to optimize the application of pesticides. The determination of the best combination of these factors can reduce the drift during the application of the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). Objective: The objective this paper is to study the influence of nozzle models, working pressures, and surfactant adjuvant in reducing the drift of 2,4-D. Methods: The spectrum of nozzle drops was determined for a conventional flat jet; flat jet with air induction; double plane jet with air induction; deflector flat jet with air induction; and an empty cone with air induction at pressures of 200, 300, 400, and 500 kPa. This was quantified in a wind tunnel with four drifts: water; water + surfactant adjuvant; water + 2,4-D; and water + 2,4-D + surfactant adjuvant, applied by the five nozzle models at four working pressures. The data was evaluated by analysis of variance and, when significant, by the Tukey test and regression at 5% significance level. Results: The interactions between the nozzle models, working pressure, and spray mixture directly influenced the 2,4-D drift. Conclusions: The use of surfactant adjuvant must be carried out carefully, according to the nozzle model, working pressure, and spray mixture. The conventional single fan jet nozzle is more sensitive to increased working pressure and has a high potential to cause drift compared with the models with air induction.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582020000100320
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582020000100320
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s0100-83582020380100070
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha v.38 2020
reponame:Planta daninha (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron:SBCPD
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron_str SBCPD
institution SBCPD
reponame_str Planta daninha (Online)
collection Planta daninha (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rpdaninha@gmail.com
_version_ 1752126497223606272