ESTIMATION OF TENSILE STRENGTH PARALLEL TO GRAIN OF WOOD SPECIES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Christoforo,André L.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Panzera,Tulio H., Lahr,Francisco A. R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Engenharia Agrícola
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162019000400533
Resumo: ABSTRACT According to the ABNT NBR 7190: 1997 standard, tensile strength of wood samples shall be defined as the ratio between the ultimate strength from a stress test and the specimen cross-sectional area (350 mm2). However, due to the complex wood anatomy and experimental difficulties, the fractured surface in tested samples are not perpendicular to the loading direction; therefore, such fractured surface becomes larger than the sample cross section, overestimating tensile strength by this method. Using an alternative approach, we aimed to determine the approximate fracture surface of wood specimens subjected to tensile test. For this purpose, we used the least square method to estimate tensile strength of four hardwood species, which were equally divided into strength classes. Then, we determined the relationship between the cross-sectional areas of intact and fractured specimens. The results showed that the approximate area of a fractured surface was 2.14 higher than that of an intact sample. As a result, tensile strength estimates were 47% lower than those currently estimated, which is unfavorable for the safety of construction structures.
id SBEA-1_9c63518ea1ffa258a481071914c9984e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-69162019000400533
network_acronym_str SBEA-1
network_name_str Engenharia Agrícola
repository_id_str
spelling ESTIMATION OF TENSILE STRENGTH PARALLEL TO GRAIN OF WOOD SPECIESTensile StrengthWoodHardwoodLeast Square MethodABSTRACT According to the ABNT NBR 7190: 1997 standard, tensile strength of wood samples shall be defined as the ratio between the ultimate strength from a stress test and the specimen cross-sectional area (350 mm2). However, due to the complex wood anatomy and experimental difficulties, the fractured surface in tested samples are not perpendicular to the loading direction; therefore, such fractured surface becomes larger than the sample cross section, overestimating tensile strength by this method. Using an alternative approach, we aimed to determine the approximate fracture surface of wood specimens subjected to tensile test. For this purpose, we used the least square method to estimate tensile strength of four hardwood species, which were equally divided into strength classes. Then, we determined the relationship between the cross-sectional areas of intact and fractured specimens. The results showed that the approximate area of a fractured surface was 2.14 higher than that of an intact sample. As a result, tensile strength estimates were 47% lower than those currently estimated, which is unfavorable for the safety of construction structures.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola2019-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162019000400533Engenharia Agrícola v.39 n.4 2019reponame:Engenharia Agrícolainstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)instacron:SBEA10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v39n4p533-536/2019info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChristoforo,André L.Panzera,Tulio H.Lahr,Francisco A. R.eng2019-08-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69162019000400533Revistahttp://www.engenhariaagricola.org.br/ORGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br1809-44300100-6916opendoar:2019-08-30T00:00Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ESTIMATION OF TENSILE STRENGTH PARALLEL TO GRAIN OF WOOD SPECIES
title ESTIMATION OF TENSILE STRENGTH PARALLEL TO GRAIN OF WOOD SPECIES
spellingShingle ESTIMATION OF TENSILE STRENGTH PARALLEL TO GRAIN OF WOOD SPECIES
Christoforo,André L.
Tensile Strength
Wood
Hardwood
Least Square Method
title_short ESTIMATION OF TENSILE STRENGTH PARALLEL TO GRAIN OF WOOD SPECIES
title_full ESTIMATION OF TENSILE STRENGTH PARALLEL TO GRAIN OF WOOD SPECIES
title_fullStr ESTIMATION OF TENSILE STRENGTH PARALLEL TO GRAIN OF WOOD SPECIES
title_full_unstemmed ESTIMATION OF TENSILE STRENGTH PARALLEL TO GRAIN OF WOOD SPECIES
title_sort ESTIMATION OF TENSILE STRENGTH PARALLEL TO GRAIN OF WOOD SPECIES
author Christoforo,André L.
author_facet Christoforo,André L.
Panzera,Tulio H.
Lahr,Francisco A. R.
author_role author
author2 Panzera,Tulio H.
Lahr,Francisco A. R.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Christoforo,André L.
Panzera,Tulio H.
Lahr,Francisco A. R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tensile Strength
Wood
Hardwood
Least Square Method
topic Tensile Strength
Wood
Hardwood
Least Square Method
description ABSTRACT According to the ABNT NBR 7190: 1997 standard, tensile strength of wood samples shall be defined as the ratio between the ultimate strength from a stress test and the specimen cross-sectional area (350 mm2). However, due to the complex wood anatomy and experimental difficulties, the fractured surface in tested samples are not perpendicular to the loading direction; therefore, such fractured surface becomes larger than the sample cross section, overestimating tensile strength by this method. Using an alternative approach, we aimed to determine the approximate fracture surface of wood specimens subjected to tensile test. For this purpose, we used the least square method to estimate tensile strength of four hardwood species, which were equally divided into strength classes. Then, we determined the relationship between the cross-sectional areas of intact and fractured specimens. The results showed that the approximate area of a fractured surface was 2.14 higher than that of an intact sample. As a result, tensile strength estimates were 47% lower than those currently estimated, which is unfavorable for the safety of construction structures.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162019000400533
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162019000400533
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v39n4p533-536/2019
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola v.39 n.4 2019
reponame:Engenharia Agrícola
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron:SBEA
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron_str SBEA
institution SBEA
reponame_str Engenharia Agrícola
collection Engenharia Agrícola
repository.name.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br
_version_ 1752126274425323520