Clinical evaluation of different epinephrine concentrations for local dental anesthesia

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Caldas,Cristina Saragiotto
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Bergamaschi,Cristiane de Cássia, Succi,Guilherme de Menezes, Motta,Rogério Heládio Lopes, Ramacciato,Juliana Cama
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Dor
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132015000100001
Resumo: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials comparing lidocaine associated to different epinephrine concentrations are scarce. This study aimed at comparing cardiovascular parameters, anesthetic efficacy and level of discomfort during the injection of two 2% lidocaine solutions associated to 1:100,000 or 1:200,000 epinephrine. METHODS: Participated in this cross-sectional double blind study 30 patients (24.3±4.7 years) who were submitted to anamnesis, vital signs evaluation and baseline threshold measurement of right upper canine tooth. In each clinical session, with 15 days interval, 1.8mL of one of the anesthetic solutions were administered. Anesthetic efficacy was measured with electric stimulation and vital parameters were evaluated in three periods: 5 minutes before, during and soon after anesthesia. At the end of each session, the visual analog scale was applied to evaluate injection pain sensitivity, which was repeated 24h later. RESULTS: All volunteers had satisfactory pressure levels to carry out the trial. There has been no statistically significant differences in systolic blood pressure (p=0.33), diastolic blood pressure (p=0.1505), heart rate (p=0.9464) and oxygen saturation (p=0.9297) considering each local anesthetic solution in each moment (during and after anesthesia). Formulations of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 epinephrine have shown no statistical differences for all anesthetic parameters (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Considering the volume used in this study, decreased epinephrine concentration on lidocaine solution has not affected its clinical efficacy and has not influenced cardiovascular parameters.
id SBED-1_c28ad92b90801d5a6f6fcf013f42bd98
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-00132015000100001
network_acronym_str SBED-1
network_name_str Revista Dor
repository_id_str
spelling Clinical evaluation of different epinephrine concentrations for local dental anesthesiaEpinephrineLocal anesthesiaVasoconstrictors BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials comparing lidocaine associated to different epinephrine concentrations are scarce. This study aimed at comparing cardiovascular parameters, anesthetic efficacy and level of discomfort during the injection of two 2% lidocaine solutions associated to 1:100,000 or 1:200,000 epinephrine. METHODS: Participated in this cross-sectional double blind study 30 patients (24.3±4.7 years) who were submitted to anamnesis, vital signs evaluation and baseline threshold measurement of right upper canine tooth. In each clinical session, with 15 days interval, 1.8mL of one of the anesthetic solutions were administered. Anesthetic efficacy was measured with electric stimulation and vital parameters were evaluated in three periods: 5 minutes before, during and soon after anesthesia. At the end of each session, the visual analog scale was applied to evaluate injection pain sensitivity, which was repeated 24h later. RESULTS: All volunteers had satisfactory pressure levels to carry out the trial. There has been no statistically significant differences in systolic blood pressure (p=0.33), diastolic blood pressure (p=0.1505), heart rate (p=0.9464) and oxygen saturation (p=0.9297) considering each local anesthetic solution in each moment (during and after anesthesia). Formulations of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 epinephrine have shown no statistical differences for all anesthetic parameters (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Considering the volume used in this study, decreased epinephrine concentration on lidocaine solution has not affected its clinical efficacy and has not influenced cardiovascular parameters. Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor2015-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132015000100001Revista Dor v.16 n.1 2015reponame:Revista Dorinstname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)instacron:SBED10.5935/1806-0013.20150001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCaldas,Cristina SaragiottoBergamaschi,Cristiane de CássiaSucci,Guilherme de MenezesMotta,Rogério Heládio LopesRamacciato,Juliana Camaeng2015-08-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-00132015000100001Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rdor/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpdor@dor.org.br||dor@dor.org.br2317-63931806-0013opendoar:2015-08-04T00:00Revista Dor - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clinical evaluation of different epinephrine concentrations for local dental anesthesia
title Clinical evaluation of different epinephrine concentrations for local dental anesthesia
spellingShingle Clinical evaluation of different epinephrine concentrations for local dental anesthesia
Caldas,Cristina Saragiotto
Epinephrine
Local anesthesia
Vasoconstrictors
title_short Clinical evaluation of different epinephrine concentrations for local dental anesthesia
title_full Clinical evaluation of different epinephrine concentrations for local dental anesthesia
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of different epinephrine concentrations for local dental anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of different epinephrine concentrations for local dental anesthesia
title_sort Clinical evaluation of different epinephrine concentrations for local dental anesthesia
author Caldas,Cristina Saragiotto
author_facet Caldas,Cristina Saragiotto
Bergamaschi,Cristiane de Cássia
Succi,Guilherme de Menezes
Motta,Rogério Heládio Lopes
Ramacciato,Juliana Cama
author_role author
author2 Bergamaschi,Cristiane de Cássia
Succi,Guilherme de Menezes
Motta,Rogério Heládio Lopes
Ramacciato,Juliana Cama
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Caldas,Cristina Saragiotto
Bergamaschi,Cristiane de Cássia
Succi,Guilherme de Menezes
Motta,Rogério Heládio Lopes
Ramacciato,Juliana Cama
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Epinephrine
Local anesthesia
Vasoconstrictors
topic Epinephrine
Local anesthesia
Vasoconstrictors
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials comparing lidocaine associated to different epinephrine concentrations are scarce. This study aimed at comparing cardiovascular parameters, anesthetic efficacy and level of discomfort during the injection of two 2% lidocaine solutions associated to 1:100,000 or 1:200,000 epinephrine. METHODS: Participated in this cross-sectional double blind study 30 patients (24.3±4.7 years) who were submitted to anamnesis, vital signs evaluation and baseline threshold measurement of right upper canine tooth. In each clinical session, with 15 days interval, 1.8mL of one of the anesthetic solutions were administered. Anesthetic efficacy was measured with electric stimulation and vital parameters were evaluated in three periods: 5 minutes before, during and soon after anesthesia. At the end of each session, the visual analog scale was applied to evaluate injection pain sensitivity, which was repeated 24h later. RESULTS: All volunteers had satisfactory pressure levels to carry out the trial. There has been no statistically significant differences in systolic blood pressure (p=0.33), diastolic blood pressure (p=0.1505), heart rate (p=0.9464) and oxygen saturation (p=0.9297) considering each local anesthetic solution in each moment (during and after anesthesia). Formulations of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 epinephrine have shown no statistical differences for all anesthetic parameters (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Considering the volume used in this study, decreased epinephrine concentration on lidocaine solution has not affected its clinical efficacy and has not influenced cardiovascular parameters.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132015000100001
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-00132015000100001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/1806-0013.20150001
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Dor v.16 n.1 2015
reponame:Revista Dor
instname:Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
instacron:SBED
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
instacron_str SBED
institution SBED
reponame_str Revista Dor
collection Revista Dor
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Dor - Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor (SBED)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dor@dor.org.br||dor@dor.org.br
_version_ 1752126254955364352