Reading comprehension assessment: effect of order of task application

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Jordão,Natália
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Kida,Adriana de Souza Batista, Aquino,Danielle Dutenhefner de, Costa,Mariana de Oliveira, Avila,Clara Regina Brandão de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: CoDAS
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822019000100309
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose To investigate the influence of order of reading tasks application on the reading comprehension performance by students with and without reading difficulties. Methods 40 students (4th and 5th grade) were classified according to the presence (Research Group-RG) or absence (Control Group-CG) of reading difficulties. RG-r and CG-r – 20 students (10 for each group) who retold the read text and responded to open-ended questions; RG-q and CG-q – 20 students (10 for each group) who responded to open-ended questions and then retold the read text. The analysis quantified the main idea, details and inferences retold, causal links and retelling reference standard (3-0) was also established from the best to the worst performance. Open-ended questions received one point for each correct answer. Results Open-ended questions influenced only the retelling performance of good readers. A better performance of CG-q was noted for the number of second level links retold (U=50.50, p=0.155), total of links retold (U=23,00, p=0.038) and retelling reference standard (U=24.50, p=0.039). Reading-monitoring strategies are laborious and tend to be less used by students with reading difficulties. This is because these compete directly with low-level skills (decoding and microstructure processing), losing efficiency or being abandoned in the very course of reading. Conclusion There was improvement on the retelling performance of students without reading difficulties when this task was preceded by the open-ended questions, possibly because of the use of monitoring strategies that allowed a better understanding of the link between the retained ideas, improving links and retelling reference standard.
id SBFA-1_f8376d9ca02c578f9fd2ed67fac96217
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2317-17822019000100309
network_acronym_str SBFA-1
network_name_str CoDAS
repository_id_str
spelling Reading comprehension assessment: effect of order of task applicationReadingComprehensionAssessmentSpeech Language PathologistLearningABSTRACT Purpose To investigate the influence of order of reading tasks application on the reading comprehension performance by students with and without reading difficulties. Methods 40 students (4th and 5th grade) were classified according to the presence (Research Group-RG) or absence (Control Group-CG) of reading difficulties. RG-r and CG-r – 20 students (10 for each group) who retold the read text and responded to open-ended questions; RG-q and CG-q – 20 students (10 for each group) who responded to open-ended questions and then retold the read text. The analysis quantified the main idea, details and inferences retold, causal links and retelling reference standard (3-0) was also established from the best to the worst performance. Open-ended questions received one point for each correct answer. Results Open-ended questions influenced only the retelling performance of good readers. A better performance of CG-q was noted for the number of second level links retold (U=50.50, p=0.155), total of links retold (U=23,00, p=0.038) and retelling reference standard (U=24.50, p=0.039). Reading-monitoring strategies are laborious and tend to be less used by students with reading difficulties. This is because these compete directly with low-level skills (decoding and microstructure processing), losing efficiency or being abandoned in the very course of reading. Conclusion There was improvement on the retelling performance of students without reading difficulties when this task was preceded by the open-ended questions, possibly because of the use of monitoring strategies that allowed a better understanding of the link between the retained ideas, improving links and retelling reference standard.Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822019000100309CoDAS v.31 n.1 2019reponame:CoDASinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)instacron:SBFA10.1590/2317-1782/20182018020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJordão,NatáliaKida,Adriana de Souza BatistaAquino,Danielle Dutenhefner deCosta,Mariana de OliveiraAvila,Clara Regina Brandão deeng2019-02-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2317-17822019000100309Revistahttps://www.codas.org.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcodas@editoracubo.com.br||revista@codas.org.br2317-17822317-1782opendoar:2019-02-22T00:00CoDAS - Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reading comprehension assessment: effect of order of task application
title Reading comprehension assessment: effect of order of task application
spellingShingle Reading comprehension assessment: effect of order of task application
Jordão,Natália
Reading
Comprehension
Assessment
Speech Language Pathologist
Learning
title_short Reading comprehension assessment: effect of order of task application
title_full Reading comprehension assessment: effect of order of task application
title_fullStr Reading comprehension assessment: effect of order of task application
title_full_unstemmed Reading comprehension assessment: effect of order of task application
title_sort Reading comprehension assessment: effect of order of task application
author Jordão,Natália
author_facet Jordão,Natália
Kida,Adriana de Souza Batista
Aquino,Danielle Dutenhefner de
Costa,Mariana de Oliveira
Avila,Clara Regina Brandão de
author_role author
author2 Kida,Adriana de Souza Batista
Aquino,Danielle Dutenhefner de
Costa,Mariana de Oliveira
Avila,Clara Regina Brandão de
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jordão,Natália
Kida,Adriana de Souza Batista
Aquino,Danielle Dutenhefner de
Costa,Mariana de Oliveira
Avila,Clara Regina Brandão de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reading
Comprehension
Assessment
Speech Language Pathologist
Learning
topic Reading
Comprehension
Assessment
Speech Language Pathologist
Learning
description ABSTRACT Purpose To investigate the influence of order of reading tasks application on the reading comprehension performance by students with and without reading difficulties. Methods 40 students (4th and 5th grade) were classified according to the presence (Research Group-RG) or absence (Control Group-CG) of reading difficulties. RG-r and CG-r – 20 students (10 for each group) who retold the read text and responded to open-ended questions; RG-q and CG-q – 20 students (10 for each group) who responded to open-ended questions and then retold the read text. The analysis quantified the main idea, details and inferences retold, causal links and retelling reference standard (3-0) was also established from the best to the worst performance. Open-ended questions received one point for each correct answer. Results Open-ended questions influenced only the retelling performance of good readers. A better performance of CG-q was noted for the number of second level links retold (U=50.50, p=0.155), total of links retold (U=23,00, p=0.038) and retelling reference standard (U=24.50, p=0.039). Reading-monitoring strategies are laborious and tend to be less used by students with reading difficulties. This is because these compete directly with low-level skills (decoding and microstructure processing), losing efficiency or being abandoned in the very course of reading. Conclusion There was improvement on the retelling performance of students without reading difficulties when this task was preceded by the open-ended questions, possibly because of the use of monitoring strategies that allowed a better understanding of the link between the retained ideas, improving links and retelling reference standard.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822019000100309
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2317-17822019000100309
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2317-1782/20182018020
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv CoDAS v.31 n.1 2019
reponame:CoDAS
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)
instacron:SBFA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)
instacron_str SBFA
institution SBFA
reponame_str CoDAS
collection CoDAS
repository.name.fl_str_mv CoDAS - Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia (SBFA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv codas@editoracubo.com.br||revista@codas.org.br
_version_ 1752122442460954624