Sampling of cashew nuts from cashew tree clones

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rossetti,Adroaldo Guimarães
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Vidal Neto,Francisco das Chagas, Barros,Levi de Moura
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452020000100419
Resumo: Abstract The aim of this work was to estimate sample sizes to assist the genetic improvement of the cashew tree (Anacardium occidentale L.). Stratified sampling, comprising five strata (S5, S4, S3, S2, and S1) of five cashew clones (BRS 274, BRS 275, BRS 226, BRS 189 and CCP 76), was effective for estimating the different sample sizes of the nut. Sample size for each clone depends on the weight-nut variance, the margin of error B permitted in the estimates and the desired precision of the results. The increases in sample size with clone variance, lowered the permitted margin of error B, and increased the desired precision of the results. These clones required different sample sizes for a morphological study of the nuts. Larger nuts require larger samples for the same margin of error B. For an error B of 0.2g, the sample size for clones S5, S4 and S3 were n5 = 84, n4 = 49 and n3 = 37 nuts. For clones BRS 274 (S5) and BRS 275 (S4), with better nut classification, the mean weights were respectively 16.79 and 12.78g. Clones BRS 189 (S2) and CCP 76 (S1), with smaller nuts, have a smaller variances, s22 = 0.7638 and s12 = 1.0712, where the mean weight was 8.29 and 7.81g respectively.
id SBFRU-1_05003429f1cd7f49137a63e4b881bc33
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-29452020000100419
network_acronym_str SBFRU-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Sampling of cashew nuts from cashew tree clonessam-ple sizeuniform stratified random samplingsampling precisionAbstract The aim of this work was to estimate sample sizes to assist the genetic improvement of the cashew tree (Anacardium occidentale L.). Stratified sampling, comprising five strata (S5, S4, S3, S2, and S1) of five cashew clones (BRS 274, BRS 275, BRS 226, BRS 189 and CCP 76), was effective for estimating the different sample sizes of the nut. Sample size for each clone depends on the weight-nut variance, the margin of error B permitted in the estimates and the desired precision of the results. The increases in sample size with clone variance, lowered the permitted margin of error B, and increased the desired precision of the results. These clones required different sample sizes for a morphological study of the nuts. Larger nuts require larger samples for the same margin of error B. For an error B of 0.2g, the sample size for clones S5, S4 and S3 were n5 = 84, n4 = 49 and n3 = 37 nuts. For clones BRS 274 (S5) and BRS 275 (S4), with better nut classification, the mean weights were respectively 16.79 and 12.78g. Clones BRS 189 (S2) and CCP 76 (S1), with smaller nuts, have a smaller variances, s22 = 0.7638 and s12 = 1.0712, where the mean weight was 8.29 and 7.81g respectively.Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452020000100419Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura v.42 n.1 2020reponame:Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)instacron:SBFRU10.1590/0100-29452020563info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRossetti,Adroaldo GuimarãesVidal Neto,Francisco das ChagasBarros,Levi de Mouraeng2020-02-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-29452020000100419Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbfhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprbf@fcav.unesp.br||http://rbf.org.br/1806-99670100-2945opendoar:2020-02-10T00:00Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sampling of cashew nuts from cashew tree clones
title Sampling of cashew nuts from cashew tree clones
spellingShingle Sampling of cashew nuts from cashew tree clones
Rossetti,Adroaldo Guimarães
sam-ple size
uniform stratified random sampling
sampling precision
title_short Sampling of cashew nuts from cashew tree clones
title_full Sampling of cashew nuts from cashew tree clones
title_fullStr Sampling of cashew nuts from cashew tree clones
title_full_unstemmed Sampling of cashew nuts from cashew tree clones
title_sort Sampling of cashew nuts from cashew tree clones
author Rossetti,Adroaldo Guimarães
author_facet Rossetti,Adroaldo Guimarães
Vidal Neto,Francisco das Chagas
Barros,Levi de Moura
author_role author
author2 Vidal Neto,Francisco das Chagas
Barros,Levi de Moura
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rossetti,Adroaldo Guimarães
Vidal Neto,Francisco das Chagas
Barros,Levi de Moura
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv sam-ple size
uniform stratified random sampling
sampling precision
topic sam-ple size
uniform stratified random sampling
sampling precision
description Abstract The aim of this work was to estimate sample sizes to assist the genetic improvement of the cashew tree (Anacardium occidentale L.). Stratified sampling, comprising five strata (S5, S4, S3, S2, and S1) of five cashew clones (BRS 274, BRS 275, BRS 226, BRS 189 and CCP 76), was effective for estimating the different sample sizes of the nut. Sample size for each clone depends on the weight-nut variance, the margin of error B permitted in the estimates and the desired precision of the results. The increases in sample size with clone variance, lowered the permitted margin of error B, and increased the desired precision of the results. These clones required different sample sizes for a morphological study of the nuts. Larger nuts require larger samples for the same margin of error B. For an error B of 0.2g, the sample size for clones S5, S4 and S3 were n5 = 84, n4 = 49 and n3 = 37 nuts. For clones BRS 274 (S5) and BRS 275 (S4), with better nut classification, the mean weights were respectively 16.79 and 12.78g. Clones BRS 189 (S2) and CCP 76 (S1), with smaller nuts, have a smaller variances, s22 = 0.7638 and s12 = 1.0712, where the mean weight was 8.29 and 7.81g respectively.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452020000100419
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-29452020000100419
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-29452020563
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura v.42 n.1 2020
reponame:Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
instacron:SBFRU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
instacron_str SBFRU
institution SBFRU
reponame_str Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de fruticultura (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura (SBF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbf@fcav.unesp.br||http://rbf.org.br/
_version_ 1752122495977127936