Antifungal susceptibility profile of Trichosporon isolates: correlation between CLSI and etest methodologies
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822010000200008 |
Resumo: | The aim of the present study was to evaluate the antifungal susceptibility profile of Trichosporon species isolated from different sources employing the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method and E-test method. Thirty-four isolates of Trichosporon spp. and six CBS reference samples were tested for their susceptibility to Amphotericin B, 5-flucytosine, Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Voriconazole and Terbinafine. All species showed high Minimun Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) for Itraconazole and susceptibility to Fluconazole, The comparison among the results obtained by the CLSI method and E-test revealed larger discrepancies among 5-flucytosine and Itraconazole. The present work provides epidemiological data that could influence therapeutic choices. Furthermore, the comparison between different methodologies could help to analyze results obtained by different laboratories. |
id |
SBM-1_af8d66bff363af2830ad6c1cb46dd113 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1517-83822010000200008 |
network_acronym_str |
SBM-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Antifungal susceptibility profile of Trichosporon isolates: correlation between CLSI and etest methodologiesTrichosporon sppantifungal drugsCLSIE-testThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the antifungal susceptibility profile of Trichosporon species isolated from different sources employing the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method and E-test method. Thirty-four isolates of Trichosporon spp. and six CBS reference samples were tested for their susceptibility to Amphotericin B, 5-flucytosine, Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Voriconazole and Terbinafine. All species showed high Minimun Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) for Itraconazole and susceptibility to Fluconazole, The comparison among the results obtained by the CLSI method and E-test revealed larger discrepancies among 5-flucytosine and Itraconazole. The present work provides epidemiological data that could influence therapeutic choices. Furthermore, the comparison between different methodologies could help to analyze results obtained by different laboratories.Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia2010-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822010000200008Brazilian Journal of Microbiology v.41 n.2 2010reponame:Brazilian Journal of Microbiologyinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)instacron:SBM10.1590/S1517-83822010000200008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLemes,Raquel M.L.Lyon,Juliana P.Moreira,Leonardo M.Resende,Maria Aparecida deeng2010-04-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1517-83822010000200008Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjm/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjm@sbmicrobiologia.org.br||mbmartin@usp.br1678-44051517-8382opendoar:2010-04-16T00:00Brazilian Journal of Microbiology - Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Antifungal susceptibility profile of Trichosporon isolates: correlation between CLSI and etest methodologies |
title |
Antifungal susceptibility profile of Trichosporon isolates: correlation between CLSI and etest methodologies |
spellingShingle |
Antifungal susceptibility profile of Trichosporon isolates: correlation between CLSI and etest methodologies Lemes,Raquel M.L. Trichosporon spp antifungal drugs CLSI E-test |
title_short |
Antifungal susceptibility profile of Trichosporon isolates: correlation between CLSI and etest methodologies |
title_full |
Antifungal susceptibility profile of Trichosporon isolates: correlation between CLSI and etest methodologies |
title_fullStr |
Antifungal susceptibility profile of Trichosporon isolates: correlation between CLSI and etest methodologies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antifungal susceptibility profile of Trichosporon isolates: correlation between CLSI and etest methodologies |
title_sort |
Antifungal susceptibility profile of Trichosporon isolates: correlation between CLSI and etest methodologies |
author |
Lemes,Raquel M.L. |
author_facet |
Lemes,Raquel M.L. Lyon,Juliana P. Moreira,Leonardo M. Resende,Maria Aparecida de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lyon,Juliana P. Moreira,Leonardo M. Resende,Maria Aparecida de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lemes,Raquel M.L. Lyon,Juliana P. Moreira,Leonardo M. Resende,Maria Aparecida de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Trichosporon spp antifungal drugs CLSI E-test |
topic |
Trichosporon spp antifungal drugs CLSI E-test |
description |
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the antifungal susceptibility profile of Trichosporon species isolated from different sources employing the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method and E-test method. Thirty-four isolates of Trichosporon spp. and six CBS reference samples were tested for their susceptibility to Amphotericin B, 5-flucytosine, Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Voriconazole and Terbinafine. All species showed high Minimun Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) for Itraconazole and susceptibility to Fluconazole, The comparison among the results obtained by the CLSI method and E-test revealed larger discrepancies among 5-flucytosine and Itraconazole. The present work provides epidemiological data that could influence therapeutic choices. Furthermore, the comparison between different methodologies could help to analyze results obtained by different laboratories. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822010000200008 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822010000200008 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1517-83822010000200008 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology v.41 n.2 2010 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Microbiology instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM) instacron:SBM |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM) |
instacron_str |
SBM |
institution |
SBM |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology - Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjm@sbmicrobiologia.org.br||mbmartin@usp.br |
_version_ |
1752122202979827712 |