POSTURAL COMPARISON BETWEEN A CONVENTIONAL BICYCLE HANDLEBAR AND AN ELLIPTICAL HANDLEBAR

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues,Luciana Almeida Chaebub
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Serra,Maysa Venturoso Gongora Buckeridge, Liporaci,Marina Germano de Souza, Rodrigues,Renata Almeida Chaebub, Bertoco,Thaís, Carvalho Júnior,Glaúcio Tasso de, Tonello,Maria Georgina Marques
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922019000300187
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction Cycling has been encouraged, not only as a way to reduce environmental pollution but also to improve people’s health. For many, the bicycle is their sole form of transportation. In view of this growth, and potential risk of injury due to excessive bicycle use, an elliptical handlebar was developed with the purpose of modifying the hand and forearm grip and improving the rider’s posture. Objective To compare vertebral spine angulations with the use of conventional and elliptical handlebars. Methods Twenty-six individuals participated in this study, in which they pedaled for two minutes with elliptical handlebars and two minutes with conventional handlebars, in order to compare the angulation of the vertebral spine using each type of handlebars. The images were filmed and evaluated by the Kinovea kinematic evaluation program. The statistical analysis was performed by Graphpad Prism 7. Results It was observed that 88% of the participants had a more upright vertebral spine angulation when using the elliptical handlebar, with statistically significant difference (p = 0.0001). Conclusion Bearing in mind that the handlebars were placed in similar support positions, it was observed, based on the quantified data, that the posture is more upright, and therefore more suitable, when using the elliptical handlebars. Level of Evidence II; Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test.
id SBMEE-1_c40320c2b313803ed71f9cbb5287a407
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1517-86922019000300187
network_acronym_str SBMEE-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling POSTURAL COMPARISON BETWEEN A CONVENTIONAL BICYCLE HANDLEBAR AND AN ELLIPTICAL HANDLEBARPostureBicyclingSpineABSTRACT Introduction Cycling has been encouraged, not only as a way to reduce environmental pollution but also to improve people’s health. For many, the bicycle is their sole form of transportation. In view of this growth, and potential risk of injury due to excessive bicycle use, an elliptical handlebar was developed with the purpose of modifying the hand and forearm grip and improving the rider’s posture. Objective To compare vertebral spine angulations with the use of conventional and elliptical handlebars. Methods Twenty-six individuals participated in this study, in which they pedaled for two minutes with elliptical handlebars and two minutes with conventional handlebars, in order to compare the angulation of the vertebral spine using each type of handlebars. The images were filmed and evaluated by the Kinovea kinematic evaluation program. The statistical analysis was performed by Graphpad Prism 7. Results It was observed that 88% of the participants had a more upright vertebral spine angulation when using the elliptical handlebar, with statistically significant difference (p = 0.0001). Conclusion Bearing in mind that the handlebars were placed in similar support positions, it was observed, based on the quantified data, that the posture is more upright, and therefore more suitable, when using the elliptical handlebars. Level of Evidence II; Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test.Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte2019-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922019000300187Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte v.25 n.3 2019reponame:Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte (SBMEE)instacron:SBMEE10.1590/1517-869220192503186276info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues,Luciana Almeida ChaebubSerra,Maysa Venturoso Gongora BuckeridgeLiporaci,Marina Germano de SouzaRodrigues,Renata Almeida ChaebubBertoco,ThaísCarvalho Júnior,Glaúcio Tasso deTonello,Maria Georgina Marqueseng2019-06-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1517-86922019000300187Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbmeONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@medicinadoesporte.org.br1806-99401517-8692opendoar:2019-06-27T00:00Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte (SBMEE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv POSTURAL COMPARISON BETWEEN A CONVENTIONAL BICYCLE HANDLEBAR AND AN ELLIPTICAL HANDLEBAR
title POSTURAL COMPARISON BETWEEN A CONVENTIONAL BICYCLE HANDLEBAR AND AN ELLIPTICAL HANDLEBAR
spellingShingle POSTURAL COMPARISON BETWEEN A CONVENTIONAL BICYCLE HANDLEBAR AND AN ELLIPTICAL HANDLEBAR
Rodrigues,Luciana Almeida Chaebub
Posture
Bicycling
Spine
title_short POSTURAL COMPARISON BETWEEN A CONVENTIONAL BICYCLE HANDLEBAR AND AN ELLIPTICAL HANDLEBAR
title_full POSTURAL COMPARISON BETWEEN A CONVENTIONAL BICYCLE HANDLEBAR AND AN ELLIPTICAL HANDLEBAR
title_fullStr POSTURAL COMPARISON BETWEEN A CONVENTIONAL BICYCLE HANDLEBAR AND AN ELLIPTICAL HANDLEBAR
title_full_unstemmed POSTURAL COMPARISON BETWEEN A CONVENTIONAL BICYCLE HANDLEBAR AND AN ELLIPTICAL HANDLEBAR
title_sort POSTURAL COMPARISON BETWEEN A CONVENTIONAL BICYCLE HANDLEBAR AND AN ELLIPTICAL HANDLEBAR
author Rodrigues,Luciana Almeida Chaebub
author_facet Rodrigues,Luciana Almeida Chaebub
Serra,Maysa Venturoso Gongora Buckeridge
Liporaci,Marina Germano de Souza
Rodrigues,Renata Almeida Chaebub
Bertoco,Thaís
Carvalho Júnior,Glaúcio Tasso de
Tonello,Maria Georgina Marques
author_role author
author2 Serra,Maysa Venturoso Gongora Buckeridge
Liporaci,Marina Germano de Souza
Rodrigues,Renata Almeida Chaebub
Bertoco,Thaís
Carvalho Júnior,Glaúcio Tasso de
Tonello,Maria Georgina Marques
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues,Luciana Almeida Chaebub
Serra,Maysa Venturoso Gongora Buckeridge
Liporaci,Marina Germano de Souza
Rodrigues,Renata Almeida Chaebub
Bertoco,Thaís
Carvalho Júnior,Glaúcio Tasso de
Tonello,Maria Georgina Marques
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Posture
Bicycling
Spine
topic Posture
Bicycling
Spine
description ABSTRACT Introduction Cycling has been encouraged, not only as a way to reduce environmental pollution but also to improve people’s health. For many, the bicycle is their sole form of transportation. In view of this growth, and potential risk of injury due to excessive bicycle use, an elliptical handlebar was developed with the purpose of modifying the hand and forearm grip and improving the rider’s posture. Objective To compare vertebral spine angulations with the use of conventional and elliptical handlebars. Methods Twenty-six individuals participated in this study, in which they pedaled for two minutes with elliptical handlebars and two minutes with conventional handlebars, in order to compare the angulation of the vertebral spine using each type of handlebars. The images were filmed and evaluated by the Kinovea kinematic evaluation program. The statistical analysis was performed by Graphpad Prism 7. Results It was observed that 88% of the participants had a more upright vertebral spine angulation when using the elliptical handlebar, with statistically significant difference (p = 0.0001). Conclusion Bearing in mind that the handlebars were placed in similar support positions, it was observed, based on the quantified data, that the posture is more upright, and therefore more suitable, when using the elliptical handlebars. Level of Evidence II; Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922019000300187
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-86922019000300187
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1517-869220192503186276
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte v.25 n.3 2019
reponame:Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte (SBMEE)
instacron:SBMEE
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte (SBMEE)
instacron_str SBMEE
institution SBMEE
reponame_str Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de medicina do esporte (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Exercício e do Esporte (SBMEE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista@medicinadoesporte.org.br
_version_ 1752122236705177600