Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wollheim,Cláudia
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Sperhacke,Rosa Dea, Fontana,Sabrina Kahler Ribeiro, Vanni,Andréa Cristina, Kato,Sérgio Kakuta, Araújo,Patricia Regina de, Barth,Afonso Luis, Madi,José Mauro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822017000200179
Resumo: Abstract INTRODUCTION: Group B Streptococcus (GBS), a source of neonatal infection, colonizes the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts of pregnant women. Routine screening for maternal GBS in late pregnancy and consequent intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis have reduced the incidence of early-onset GBS neonatal infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of PCR, compared to culture (gold standard), in GBS colonization screening of pregnant women, and to establish the prevalence of GBS colonization among this population. METHODS: Vaginal introitus and perianal samples were collected from 204 pregnant women, between the 35th and 37th weeks of pregnancy, at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit of the University of Caxias do Sul General Hospital between June 2008 and September 2009. All samples were cultured after enrichment in a selective medium and then assayed by culture and PCR methods. RESULTS: The culture and PCR methods yielded detection rates of vaginal/perianal GBS colonization of 22.5% and 26%, respectively (sensitivity 100%; specificity 95.6%; positive and negative predictive values 86.8% and 100%, respectively). A higher prevalence of GBS colonization was detected in the combined vaginal and perianal samples by both culture and PCR assay analyses. CONCLUSIONS: PCR is a faster and more efficient method for GBS screening, allowing for optimal identification of women who should receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent newborn infection.
id SBMT-1_80736816ad3f1905f5ac247a700476b6
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0037-86822017000200179
network_acronym_str SBMT-1
network_name_str Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
repository_id_str
spelling Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methodsGroup B StreptococcusPregnant womenCulturePCRAbstract INTRODUCTION: Group B Streptococcus (GBS), a source of neonatal infection, colonizes the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts of pregnant women. Routine screening for maternal GBS in late pregnancy and consequent intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis have reduced the incidence of early-onset GBS neonatal infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of PCR, compared to culture (gold standard), in GBS colonization screening of pregnant women, and to establish the prevalence of GBS colonization among this population. METHODS: Vaginal introitus and perianal samples were collected from 204 pregnant women, between the 35th and 37th weeks of pregnancy, at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit of the University of Caxias do Sul General Hospital between June 2008 and September 2009. All samples were cultured after enrichment in a selective medium and then assayed by culture and PCR methods. RESULTS: The culture and PCR methods yielded detection rates of vaginal/perianal GBS colonization of 22.5% and 26%, respectively (sensitivity 100%; specificity 95.6%; positive and negative predictive values 86.8% and 100%, respectively). A higher prevalence of GBS colonization was detected in the combined vaginal and perianal samples by both culture and PCR assay analyses. CONCLUSIONS: PCR is a faster and more efficient method for GBS screening, allowing for optimal identification of women who should receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent newborn infection.Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT2017-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822017000200179Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical v.50 n.2 2017reponame:Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropicalinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)instacron:SBMT10.1590/0037-8682-0454-2016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWollheim,CláudiaSperhacke,Rosa DeaFontana,Sabrina Kahler RibeiroVanni,Andréa CristinaKato,Sérgio KakutaAraújo,Patricia Regina deBarth,Afonso LuisMadi,José Mauroeng2017-05-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0037-86822017000200179Revistahttps://www.sbmt.org.br/portal/revista/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||dalmo@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br|| rsbmt@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br1678-98490037-8682opendoar:2017-05-12T00:00Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods
title Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods
spellingShingle Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods
Wollheim,Cláudia
Group B Streptococcus
Pregnant women
Culture
PCR
title_short Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods
title_full Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods
title_fullStr Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods
title_full_unstemmed Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods
title_sort Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods
author Wollheim,Cláudia
author_facet Wollheim,Cláudia
Sperhacke,Rosa Dea
Fontana,Sabrina Kahler Ribeiro
Vanni,Andréa Cristina
Kato,Sérgio Kakuta
Araújo,Patricia Regina de
Barth,Afonso Luis
Madi,José Mauro
author_role author
author2 Sperhacke,Rosa Dea
Fontana,Sabrina Kahler Ribeiro
Vanni,Andréa Cristina
Kato,Sérgio Kakuta
Araújo,Patricia Regina de
Barth,Afonso Luis
Madi,José Mauro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wollheim,Cláudia
Sperhacke,Rosa Dea
Fontana,Sabrina Kahler Ribeiro
Vanni,Andréa Cristina
Kato,Sérgio Kakuta
Araújo,Patricia Regina de
Barth,Afonso Luis
Madi,José Mauro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Group B Streptococcus
Pregnant women
Culture
PCR
topic Group B Streptococcus
Pregnant women
Culture
PCR
description Abstract INTRODUCTION: Group B Streptococcus (GBS), a source of neonatal infection, colonizes the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts of pregnant women. Routine screening for maternal GBS in late pregnancy and consequent intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis have reduced the incidence of early-onset GBS neonatal infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of PCR, compared to culture (gold standard), in GBS colonization screening of pregnant women, and to establish the prevalence of GBS colonization among this population. METHODS: Vaginal introitus and perianal samples were collected from 204 pregnant women, between the 35th and 37th weeks of pregnancy, at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit of the University of Caxias do Sul General Hospital between June 2008 and September 2009. All samples were cultured after enrichment in a selective medium and then assayed by culture and PCR methods. RESULTS: The culture and PCR methods yielded detection rates of vaginal/perianal GBS colonization of 22.5% and 26%, respectively (sensitivity 100%; specificity 95.6%; positive and negative predictive values 86.8% and 100%, respectively). A higher prevalence of GBS colonization was detected in the combined vaginal and perianal samples by both culture and PCR assay analyses. CONCLUSIONS: PCR is a faster and more efficient method for GBS screening, allowing for optimal identification of women who should receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent newborn infection.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822017000200179
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822017000200179
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0037-8682-0454-2016
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical v.50 n.2 2017
reponame:Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)
instacron:SBMT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)
instacron_str SBMT
institution SBMT
reponame_str Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
collection Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical (SBMT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||dalmo@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br|| rsbmt@rsbmt.uftm.edu.br
_version_ 1752122160623648768