Comparison of preoperative fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia for anesthetic procedures in dogs with sepsis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Vírgínia Conceição Tavares
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Peixoto, Ana Julia Rodrigues, Fernandes, Maria Eduarda dos Santos Lopes, Oliveira, Lucinéia Costa, Campos, Ana Carolina de Souza, de Oliveira, Ágatha Ferreira Xavier, Stocco, Naiara Vidal, Baldani, Cristiane Divan, Barros, Felipe Farias Pereira da Câmara, Coelho, Cássia Maria Molinaro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
Texto Completo: https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/1253
Resumo: This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate different fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia in the cardiorespiratory stability of bitches with sepsis subjected to a surgical procedure to control the infectious focus. Thirty-two bitches diagnosed with pyometra and sepsis and treated at the University Veterinary Hospital between 2018 and 2019 were recruited. After admission, diagnosis, clinical, and laboratory evaluation, patients were randomly distributed into the following groups: propofol 5 (P[5]: preoperative restrictive fluid therapy–5mL/kg/h and intravenous general anesthesia); propofol 10 (P[10]: preoperative liberal fluid therapy–10mL/kg/h and intravenous general anesthesia); and isoflurane 5 (I[5]: preoperative restrictive fluid therapy–5mL/kg/h and inhalational general anesthesia). Lactate on admission (LAC1) and release (LAC2), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), rectal temperature (RT), oxygen saturation (SpO2 ), and carbon dioxide extraction rate (EtCO2 ) were analyzed at PRE, T10, T20, T30, T40, T50, TEXT, and TDIS. Clearance of 20% of lactate occurred in 18 dogs, with the P[10] group displaying the best performance. There was no statistical difference in vasopressor requirements among the groups. Liberal fluid therapy showed greater cardiovascular stability than restrictive therapy in the perioperative period. Regarding general anesthesia, isoflurane showed greater cardiorespiratory stability than propofol during anesthetic maintenance. In conclusion, although the three proposed protocols are safe and there is no difference in their superiority, some observed changes may be relevant and considered when it is possible to individualize the therapy for the patient.
id SBMV-1_fa5335589c30f062f75b7d3b90c097ed
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.rbmv.org:article/1253
network_acronym_str SBMV-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of preoperative fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia for anesthetic procedures in dogs with sepsisComparação de protocolos de fluidoterapia pré-operatória associados a anestesia inalatória ou total intravenosa para procedimentos anestésicos em cães com sepsebitches, pyometra, cardiovascular stability, organ dysfunction, arterial hypotensioncadelas, piometra, estabilidade cardiovascular, disfunção orgânica, hipotensão arterial.This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate different fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia in the cardiorespiratory stability of bitches with sepsis subjected to a surgical procedure to control the infectious focus. Thirty-two bitches diagnosed with pyometra and sepsis and treated at the University Veterinary Hospital between 2018 and 2019 were recruited. After admission, diagnosis, clinical, and laboratory evaluation, patients were randomly distributed into the following groups: propofol 5 (P[5]: preoperative restrictive fluid therapy–5mL/kg/h and intravenous general anesthesia); propofol 10 (P[10]: preoperative liberal fluid therapy–10mL/kg/h and intravenous general anesthesia); and isoflurane 5 (I[5]: preoperative restrictive fluid therapy–5mL/kg/h and inhalational general anesthesia). Lactate on admission (LAC1) and release (LAC2), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), rectal temperature (RT), oxygen saturation (SpO2 ), and carbon dioxide extraction rate (EtCO2 ) were analyzed at PRE, T10, T20, T30, T40, T50, TEXT, and TDIS. Clearance of 20% of lactate occurred in 18 dogs, with the P[10] group displaying the best performance. There was no statistical difference in vasopressor requirements among the groups. Liberal fluid therapy showed greater cardiovascular stability than restrictive therapy in the perioperative period. Regarding general anesthesia, isoflurane showed greater cardiorespiratory stability than propofol during anesthetic maintenance. In conclusion, although the three proposed protocols are safe and there is no difference in their superiority, some observed changes may be relevant and considered when it is possible to individualize the therapy for the patient.Este ensaio clínico randomizado teve a proposição de avaliar diferentes protocolos de fluidoterapia associados a anestesia inalatória ou total intravenosa, na estabilidade hemodinâmica de cadelas com sepse, submetidas a procedimento cirúrgico, para controle do foco infeccioso. Foram incluídas trinta e duas cadelas, com diagnóstico de piometra e sepse, atendidas em hospital veterinário universitário, no período de 2018 a 2019. Após admissão, diagnóstico, avaliação clínica e laboratoriais, os pacientes foram distribuídos de maneira aleatória nos grupos Propofol 5 (P[5]: fluidoterapia restritiva pré-operatória - 5mL/kg/h e anestesia geral intravenosa), Propofol 10 (P[10]: fluidoterapia liberal pré-operatória - 10mL/kg/h e anestesia geral intravenosa) e Isoflurano 5 (I[5]: fluidoterapia restritiva pré-operatória - 5mL/kg/h e anestesia geral inalatória). Foram analisados lactato na admissão (LAC1) e liberação (LAC2), frequências cardíacas (HR) e respiratória (RR), pressão arterial sistólica (SBP), temperatura retal (RT), saturação de oxigênio (SpO2 ) e taxa de extração de dióxido de carbono (EtCO2 ) nos seguintes momentos: PRE, T10, T20, T30, T40, T50, TEXT e TDIS. A depuração de 20% do lactato ocorreu em 18 cães, tendo o grupo P[10] o melhor desempenho. Não houve diferença estatística no requerimento de vasopressores entre os grupos. A fluidoterapia liberal apresentou maior estabilidade cardiovascular quando comparado com a restritiva no período perioperatório. Com relação a anestesia geral, o isoflurano apresentou maior estabilidade cardiorrespiratória que o propofol na manutenção anestésica. Nós concluímos que apesar de os três protocolos propostos serem seguros e sem diferença em superioridade entre eles, algumas alterações observadas podem ser relevantes e ponderadas quando for possível a individualização da terapêutica no paciente.Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.2022-08-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpeer reviewedAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/125310.29374/2527-2179.bjvm001222Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine; Vol. 44 (2022); e001222Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária; v. 44 (2022); e0012222527-21790100-2430reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicineinstname:Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)instacron:SBMVenghttps://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/1253/1249https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/1253/1258Copyright (c) 2022 Vírgínia Conceição Tavares Lima, Ana Julia Rodrigues Peixoto, Maria Eduarda dos Santos Lopes Fernandes, Lucinéia Costa Oliveira, Ana Carolina de Souza Campos, Ágatha Ferreira Xavier de Oliveira, Naiara Vidal Stocco, Cristiane Divan Baldani, Felipe Farias Pereira da Câmara Barros, Cássia Maria Molinaro Coelhohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Vírgínia Conceição TavaresPeixoto, Ana Julia RodriguesFernandes, Maria Eduarda dos Santos LopesOliveira, Lucinéia CostaCampos, Ana Carolina de Souzade Oliveira, Ágatha Ferreira XavierStocco, Naiara VidalBaldani, Cristiane DivanBarros, Felipe Farias Pereira da CâmaraCoelho, Cássia Maria Molinaro2022-09-20T14:25:38Zoai:ojs.rbmv.org:article/1253Revistahttps://rbmv.org/BJVMONGhttps://rbmv.org/BJVM/oaicontato.rbmv@gmail.com2527-21790100-2430opendoar:2022-09-20T14:25:38Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine - Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of preoperative fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia for anesthetic procedures in dogs with sepsis
Comparação de protocolos de fluidoterapia pré-operatória associados a anestesia inalatória ou total intravenosa para procedimentos anestésicos em cães com sepse
title Comparison of preoperative fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia for anesthetic procedures in dogs with sepsis
spellingShingle Comparison of preoperative fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia for anesthetic procedures in dogs with sepsis
Lima, Vírgínia Conceição Tavares
bitches, pyometra, cardiovascular stability, organ dysfunction, arterial hypotension
cadelas, piometra, estabilidade cardiovascular, disfunção orgânica, hipotensão arterial.
title_short Comparison of preoperative fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia for anesthetic procedures in dogs with sepsis
title_full Comparison of preoperative fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia for anesthetic procedures in dogs with sepsis
title_fullStr Comparison of preoperative fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia for anesthetic procedures in dogs with sepsis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of preoperative fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia for anesthetic procedures in dogs with sepsis
title_sort Comparison of preoperative fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia for anesthetic procedures in dogs with sepsis
author Lima, Vírgínia Conceição Tavares
author_facet Lima, Vírgínia Conceição Tavares
Peixoto, Ana Julia Rodrigues
Fernandes, Maria Eduarda dos Santos Lopes
Oliveira, Lucinéia Costa
Campos, Ana Carolina de Souza
de Oliveira, Ágatha Ferreira Xavier
Stocco, Naiara Vidal
Baldani, Cristiane Divan
Barros, Felipe Farias Pereira da Câmara
Coelho, Cássia Maria Molinaro
author_role author
author2 Peixoto, Ana Julia Rodrigues
Fernandes, Maria Eduarda dos Santos Lopes
Oliveira, Lucinéia Costa
Campos, Ana Carolina de Souza
de Oliveira, Ágatha Ferreira Xavier
Stocco, Naiara Vidal
Baldani, Cristiane Divan
Barros, Felipe Farias Pereira da Câmara
Coelho, Cássia Maria Molinaro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Vírgínia Conceição Tavares
Peixoto, Ana Julia Rodrigues
Fernandes, Maria Eduarda dos Santos Lopes
Oliveira, Lucinéia Costa
Campos, Ana Carolina de Souza
de Oliveira, Ágatha Ferreira Xavier
Stocco, Naiara Vidal
Baldani, Cristiane Divan
Barros, Felipe Farias Pereira da Câmara
Coelho, Cássia Maria Molinaro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bitches, pyometra, cardiovascular stability, organ dysfunction, arterial hypotension
cadelas, piometra, estabilidade cardiovascular, disfunção orgânica, hipotensão arterial.
topic bitches, pyometra, cardiovascular stability, organ dysfunction, arterial hypotension
cadelas, piometra, estabilidade cardiovascular, disfunção orgânica, hipotensão arterial.
description This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate different fluid therapy protocols associated with inhalational or total intravenous anesthesia in the cardiorespiratory stability of bitches with sepsis subjected to a surgical procedure to control the infectious focus. Thirty-two bitches diagnosed with pyometra and sepsis and treated at the University Veterinary Hospital between 2018 and 2019 were recruited. After admission, diagnosis, clinical, and laboratory evaluation, patients were randomly distributed into the following groups: propofol 5 (P[5]: preoperative restrictive fluid therapy–5mL/kg/h and intravenous general anesthesia); propofol 10 (P[10]: preoperative liberal fluid therapy–10mL/kg/h and intravenous general anesthesia); and isoflurane 5 (I[5]: preoperative restrictive fluid therapy–5mL/kg/h and inhalational general anesthesia). Lactate on admission (LAC1) and release (LAC2), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), rectal temperature (RT), oxygen saturation (SpO2 ), and carbon dioxide extraction rate (EtCO2 ) were analyzed at PRE, T10, T20, T30, T40, T50, TEXT, and TDIS. Clearance of 20% of lactate occurred in 18 dogs, with the P[10] group displaying the best performance. There was no statistical difference in vasopressor requirements among the groups. Liberal fluid therapy showed greater cardiovascular stability than restrictive therapy in the perioperative period. Regarding general anesthesia, isoflurane showed greater cardiorespiratory stability than propofol during anesthetic maintenance. In conclusion, although the three proposed protocols are safe and there is no difference in their superiority, some observed changes may be relevant and considered when it is possible to individualize the therapy for the patient.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
peer reviewed
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/1253
10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm001222
url https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/1253
identifier_str_mv 10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm001222
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/1253/1249
https://rbmv.org/BJVM/article/view/1253/1258
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine; Vol. 44 (2022); e001222
Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterinária; v. 44 (2022); e001222
2527-2179
0100-2430
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
instname:Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)
instacron:SBMV
instname_str Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)
instacron_str SBMV
institution SBMV
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
collection Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine - Sociedade de Medicina Veterinária do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (SOMVERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv contato.rbmv@gmail.com
_version_ 1798313111699062784