Urgent vs. planned peritoneal dialysis initiation: complications and outcomes in the first year of therapy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pilatti,Murilo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Theodorovitz,Valeria Catharina, Hille,Daniela, Sevignani,Gabriela, Ferreira,Helen Caroline, Vieira,Marcos Alexandre, Calice-Silva,Viviane, França,Paulo Henrique Condeixa de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002022005021401
Resumo: Abstract Introduction: Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (US-PD) has been proposed as a safe modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with an indication for emergency dialysis initiation. We aimed to compare the characteristics, 30-day complications, and clinical outcomes of US-PD and planned peritoneal dialysis (Plan-PD) patients over the first year of therapy. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study that included incident adult patients followed for up to one year. US-PD was considered when incident patients started therapy within 7 days after Tenckhoff catheter implantation. Plan-PD group consisted of patients who started therapy after the breaking period (15 days). Mechanical and infectious complications were compared 30 days from PD initiation. Hospitalization and technique failure during the first 12 months on PD were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and the determinants were calculated by Cox regression models. Results: All patients starting PD between October/2016 and November/2019 who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were analyzed. We evaluated 137 patients (70 in the US-PD x 67 Plan-PD). The main complications in the first 30 days were catheter tip migration (7.5% Plan-PD x 4.3% US-PD - p= 0.49) and leakage (4.5% Plan-PD x 5.7% US-PD - p=0.74). Most catheters were placed using the Seldinger technique. The main cause of dropout was death in US-PD patients (15.7%) and transfer to HD in Plan-PD patients (13.4%). The occurrence of complications in the first 30 days was the only risk factor for dropout (OR = 2.9; 95% CI 1.1-7.5, p = 0.03). Hospitalization rates and technique survival were similar in both groups. Conclusion: The lack of significant differences in patients’ outcomes between groups reinforces that PD is a safe and applicable dialysis method in patients who need immediate dialysis.
id SBN-1_e7efdd57100ece8838636bae906d40a0
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-28002022005021401
network_acronym_str SBN-1
network_name_str Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
repository_id_str
spelling Urgent vs. planned peritoneal dialysis initiation: complications and outcomes in the first year of therapyRenal InsufficiencyChronicRenal Replacement TherapyPeritoneal DialysisEmergenciesAbstract Introduction: Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (US-PD) has been proposed as a safe modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with an indication for emergency dialysis initiation. We aimed to compare the characteristics, 30-day complications, and clinical outcomes of US-PD and planned peritoneal dialysis (Plan-PD) patients over the first year of therapy. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study that included incident adult patients followed for up to one year. US-PD was considered when incident patients started therapy within 7 days after Tenckhoff catheter implantation. Plan-PD group consisted of patients who started therapy after the breaking period (15 days). Mechanical and infectious complications were compared 30 days from PD initiation. Hospitalization and technique failure during the first 12 months on PD were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and the determinants were calculated by Cox regression models. Results: All patients starting PD between October/2016 and November/2019 who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were analyzed. We evaluated 137 patients (70 in the US-PD x 67 Plan-PD). The main complications in the first 30 days were catheter tip migration (7.5% Plan-PD x 4.3% US-PD - p= 0.49) and leakage (4.5% Plan-PD x 5.7% US-PD - p=0.74). Most catheters were placed using the Seldinger technique. The main cause of dropout was death in US-PD patients (15.7%) and transfer to HD in Plan-PD patients (13.4%). The occurrence of complications in the first 30 days was the only risk factor for dropout (OR = 2.9; 95% CI 1.1-7.5, p = 0.03). Hospitalization rates and technique survival were similar in both groups. Conclusion: The lack of significant differences in patients’ outcomes between groups reinforces that PD is a safe and applicable dialysis method in patients who need immediate dialysis.Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002022005021401Brazilian Journal of Nephrology n.ahead 2022reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologiainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN)instacron:SBN10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2021-0182info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPilatti,MuriloTheodorovitz,Valeria CatharinaHille,DanielaSevignani,GabrielaFerreira,Helen CarolineVieira,Marcos AlexandreCalice-Silva,VivianeFrança,Paulo Henrique Condeixa deeng2022-03-31T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-28002022005021401Revistahttp://www.bjn.org.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jbn@sbn.org.br2175-82390101-2800opendoar:2022-03-31T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia - Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Urgent vs. planned peritoneal dialysis initiation: complications and outcomes in the first year of therapy
title Urgent vs. planned peritoneal dialysis initiation: complications and outcomes in the first year of therapy
spellingShingle Urgent vs. planned peritoneal dialysis initiation: complications and outcomes in the first year of therapy
Pilatti,Murilo
Renal Insufficiency
Chronic
Renal Replacement Therapy
Peritoneal Dialysis
Emergencies
title_short Urgent vs. planned peritoneal dialysis initiation: complications and outcomes in the first year of therapy
title_full Urgent vs. planned peritoneal dialysis initiation: complications and outcomes in the first year of therapy
title_fullStr Urgent vs. planned peritoneal dialysis initiation: complications and outcomes in the first year of therapy
title_full_unstemmed Urgent vs. planned peritoneal dialysis initiation: complications and outcomes in the first year of therapy
title_sort Urgent vs. planned peritoneal dialysis initiation: complications and outcomes in the first year of therapy
author Pilatti,Murilo
author_facet Pilatti,Murilo
Theodorovitz,Valeria Catharina
Hille,Daniela
Sevignani,Gabriela
Ferreira,Helen Caroline
Vieira,Marcos Alexandre
Calice-Silva,Viviane
França,Paulo Henrique Condeixa de
author_role author
author2 Theodorovitz,Valeria Catharina
Hille,Daniela
Sevignani,Gabriela
Ferreira,Helen Caroline
Vieira,Marcos Alexandre
Calice-Silva,Viviane
França,Paulo Henrique Condeixa de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pilatti,Murilo
Theodorovitz,Valeria Catharina
Hille,Daniela
Sevignani,Gabriela
Ferreira,Helen Caroline
Vieira,Marcos Alexandre
Calice-Silva,Viviane
França,Paulo Henrique Condeixa de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Renal Insufficiency
Chronic
Renal Replacement Therapy
Peritoneal Dialysis
Emergencies
topic Renal Insufficiency
Chronic
Renal Replacement Therapy
Peritoneal Dialysis
Emergencies
description Abstract Introduction: Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (US-PD) has been proposed as a safe modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with an indication for emergency dialysis initiation. We aimed to compare the characteristics, 30-day complications, and clinical outcomes of US-PD and planned peritoneal dialysis (Plan-PD) patients over the first year of therapy. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study that included incident adult patients followed for up to one year. US-PD was considered when incident patients started therapy within 7 days after Tenckhoff catheter implantation. Plan-PD group consisted of patients who started therapy after the breaking period (15 days). Mechanical and infectious complications were compared 30 days from PD initiation. Hospitalization and technique failure during the first 12 months on PD were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and the determinants were calculated by Cox regression models. Results: All patients starting PD between October/2016 and November/2019 who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were analyzed. We evaluated 137 patients (70 in the US-PD x 67 Plan-PD). The main complications in the first 30 days were catheter tip migration (7.5% Plan-PD x 4.3% US-PD - p= 0.49) and leakage (4.5% Plan-PD x 5.7% US-PD - p=0.74). Most catheters were placed using the Seldinger technique. The main cause of dropout was death in US-PD patients (15.7%) and transfer to HD in Plan-PD patients (13.4%). The occurrence of complications in the first 30 days was the only risk factor for dropout (OR = 2.9; 95% CI 1.1-7.5, p = 0.03). Hospitalization rates and technique survival were similar in both groups. Conclusion: The lack of significant differences in patients’ outcomes between groups reinforces that PD is a safe and applicable dialysis method in patients who need immediate dialysis.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002022005021401
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-28002022005021401
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2021-0182
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Nephrology n.ahead 2022
reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN)
instacron:SBN
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN)
instacron_str SBN
institution SBN
reponame_str Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
collection Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia - Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia (SBN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jbn@sbn.org.br
_version_ 1752122067640123392