Clinical evaluation of patients submitted to osteogenic distraction in the lower limb at a university hospital

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sampaio,Francisco Macruz Baltazar
Publication Date: 2016
Other Authors: Marçal,Leilane Passoni, Reis,Diogo Gontijo dos, Kasuo,Adolfo Watanabe, Fraga,Carlos Eduardo Cabral, Moraes,Frederico Barra de
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000500521
Summary: ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical characteristics from patients submitted to osteogenic distraction to correct bone gap at a university hospital. METHODS: Retrospective transversal study, with a convenience sample, from 2000 to 2012, evaluating clinical aspects of patients treated, submitted to osteogenic distraction (bone transport) with Ilizarov's external fixation device. The chi-squared, Fisher's, and Mann-Whitney's U tests were used with a 5% level of significance (p < 0.05). RESULTS: 33 patients were studied, of whom 28 men (84.8%). The more frequent age was from 21 to 40 years. Most patients were from the metropolitan region of the capital (57.6%). The leg was the most affected limb (75.8%), and the left side was the most affected (66.7%). The most common cause was infected pseudoarthrosis (75.8%). The most common bone transportation type was bifocal (75.8%). Mean previous surgery at others institutions were 2.62 (1.93 standard deviation), and mean surgeries after treatment were 1.89 (1.29 standard deviation). Ilizarov's external fixation device was used for 1.94 years (1.34 mean deviation), from one to six years. The most common complications were pin infection (57.6%), equinus (30.3%), deep infection (24.2%), and shortening (21.2%). CONCLUSION: Osteogenic distraction for bone gaps were more frequent in young adults, men, in the leg, with bifocal transportation, after several previous surgeries, treated for a mean of two years, with many complications (infections were the most common).
id SBOT-2_1579623d3890628bfed560d7d8f5fc48
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-36162016000500521
network_acronym_str SBOT-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Clinical evaluation of patients submitted to osteogenic distraction in the lower limb at a university hospitalPseudoarthrosisOsteogenesis, distractionIlizarov techniqueABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical characteristics from patients submitted to osteogenic distraction to correct bone gap at a university hospital. METHODS: Retrospective transversal study, with a convenience sample, from 2000 to 2012, evaluating clinical aspects of patients treated, submitted to osteogenic distraction (bone transport) with Ilizarov's external fixation device. The chi-squared, Fisher's, and Mann-Whitney's U tests were used with a 5% level of significance (p < 0.05). RESULTS: 33 patients were studied, of whom 28 men (84.8%). The more frequent age was from 21 to 40 years. Most patients were from the metropolitan region of the capital (57.6%). The leg was the most affected limb (75.8%), and the left side was the most affected (66.7%). The most common cause was infected pseudoarthrosis (75.8%). The most common bone transportation type was bifocal (75.8%). Mean previous surgery at others institutions were 2.62 (1.93 standard deviation), and mean surgeries after treatment were 1.89 (1.29 standard deviation). Ilizarov's external fixation device was used for 1.94 years (1.34 mean deviation), from one to six years. The most common complications were pin infection (57.6%), equinus (30.3%), deep infection (24.2%), and shortening (21.2%). CONCLUSION: Osteogenic distraction for bone gaps were more frequent in young adults, men, in the leg, with bifocal transportation, after several previous surgeries, treated for a mean of two years, with many complications (infections were the most common).Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000500521Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.51 n.5 2016reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rboe.2016.08.010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSampaio,Francisco Macruz BaltazarMarçal,Leilane PassoniReis,Diogo Gontijo dosKasuo,Adolfo WatanabeFraga,Carlos Eduardo CabralMoraes,Frederico Barra deeng2016-11-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162016000500521Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2016-11-18T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clinical evaluation of patients submitted to osteogenic distraction in the lower limb at a university hospital
title Clinical evaluation of patients submitted to osteogenic distraction in the lower limb at a university hospital
spellingShingle Clinical evaluation of patients submitted to osteogenic distraction in the lower limb at a university hospital
Sampaio,Francisco Macruz Baltazar
Pseudoarthrosis
Osteogenesis, distraction
Ilizarov technique
title_short Clinical evaluation of patients submitted to osteogenic distraction in the lower limb at a university hospital
title_full Clinical evaluation of patients submitted to osteogenic distraction in the lower limb at a university hospital
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of patients submitted to osteogenic distraction in the lower limb at a university hospital
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of patients submitted to osteogenic distraction in the lower limb at a university hospital
title_sort Clinical evaluation of patients submitted to osteogenic distraction in the lower limb at a university hospital
author Sampaio,Francisco Macruz Baltazar
author_facet Sampaio,Francisco Macruz Baltazar
Marçal,Leilane Passoni
Reis,Diogo Gontijo dos
Kasuo,Adolfo Watanabe
Fraga,Carlos Eduardo Cabral
Moraes,Frederico Barra de
author_role author
author2 Marçal,Leilane Passoni
Reis,Diogo Gontijo dos
Kasuo,Adolfo Watanabe
Fraga,Carlos Eduardo Cabral
Moraes,Frederico Barra de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sampaio,Francisco Macruz Baltazar
Marçal,Leilane Passoni
Reis,Diogo Gontijo dos
Kasuo,Adolfo Watanabe
Fraga,Carlos Eduardo Cabral
Moraes,Frederico Barra de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pseudoarthrosis
Osteogenesis, distraction
Ilizarov technique
topic Pseudoarthrosis
Osteogenesis, distraction
Ilizarov technique
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical characteristics from patients submitted to osteogenic distraction to correct bone gap at a university hospital. METHODS: Retrospective transversal study, with a convenience sample, from 2000 to 2012, evaluating clinical aspects of patients treated, submitted to osteogenic distraction (bone transport) with Ilizarov's external fixation device. The chi-squared, Fisher's, and Mann-Whitney's U tests were used with a 5% level of significance (p < 0.05). RESULTS: 33 patients were studied, of whom 28 men (84.8%). The more frequent age was from 21 to 40 years. Most patients were from the metropolitan region of the capital (57.6%). The leg was the most affected limb (75.8%), and the left side was the most affected (66.7%). The most common cause was infected pseudoarthrosis (75.8%). The most common bone transportation type was bifocal (75.8%). Mean previous surgery at others institutions were 2.62 (1.93 standard deviation), and mean surgeries after treatment were 1.89 (1.29 standard deviation). Ilizarov's external fixation device was used for 1.94 years (1.34 mean deviation), from one to six years. The most common complications were pin infection (57.6%), equinus (30.3%), deep infection (24.2%), and shortening (21.2%). CONCLUSION: Osteogenic distraction for bone gaps were more frequent in young adults, men, in the leg, with bifocal transportation, after several previous surgeries, treated for a mean of two years, with many complications (infections were the most common).
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000500521
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000500521
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.08.010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.51 n.5 2016
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbo@sbot.org.br
_version_ 1752122360459165696