Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alencar Neto,Jonatas Brito
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Osório Neto,Ernane Bruno, Souza,Clodoaldo José Duarte de, Rocha,Pedro Henrique Messias da, Cavalcante,Maria Luzete Costa, Lopes,Márcio Bezerra Gadelha
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000400459
Resumo: Abstract Objective To evaluate the interobserver agreement of two classifications for floating knee: Fraser and Blake & McBryde. Method Thirty-two observers, subdivided according to the degree of titration (26 resident physicians and 6 orthopedic physicians specialized in orthopedic trauma), classified 15 fractures of the ipsilateral femur and tibia. Interobserver agreement was evaluated by using the Kappa coefficient. Result When evaluating the agreement between the 9 R1, a Kappa index of 0.58 was obtained for the Fraser classification and of 0.46 for the Blake & McBryde classification. Among the 7 R2, a rate of 0.59 was obtained for the Fraser rating and 0.51 for the Blake & McBryderating. Among the 10 R3, theagreement index was higher for both classifications: 0.72 for the Fraser and 0.71 for the Blake & McBryde classification. Considering the 3 groups (R1, R2, R3) as one large group, the general Kappa index was calculated, which resulted in 0.63for the Fraser classification and 0.56 for the Blake & McBryde classification. In the group of traumaand orthopedic knee specialists, in turn, an agreement of 0.597 was obtained for the Blake and McBryde classification and of 0.843 for the Fraser classification. Conclusion Comparatively, the two classifications presented a weak to moderate degree of agreement. Fraser classification had better agreement in both groups. The agreement was higher when evaluating orthopedic trauma physicians.
id SBOT-2_4a501be9941ce35fb3931c11202676a5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-36162021000400459
network_acronym_str SBOT-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Kneetibia fractures/ classificationvalidation studiesevaluationAbstract Objective To evaluate the interobserver agreement of two classifications for floating knee: Fraser and Blake & McBryde. Method Thirty-two observers, subdivided according to the degree of titration (26 resident physicians and 6 orthopedic physicians specialized in orthopedic trauma), classified 15 fractures of the ipsilateral femur and tibia. Interobserver agreement was evaluated by using the Kappa coefficient. Result When evaluating the agreement between the 9 R1, a Kappa index of 0.58 was obtained for the Fraser classification and of 0.46 for the Blake & McBryde classification. Among the 7 R2, a rate of 0.59 was obtained for the Fraser rating and 0.51 for the Blake & McBryderating. Among the 10 R3, theagreement index was higher for both classifications: 0.72 for the Fraser and 0.71 for the Blake & McBryde classification. Considering the 3 groups (R1, R2, R3) as one large group, the general Kappa index was calculated, which resulted in 0.63for the Fraser classification and 0.56 for the Blake & McBryde classification. In the group of traumaand orthopedic knee specialists, in turn, an agreement of 0.597 was obtained for the Blake and McBryde classification and of 0.843 for the Fraser classification. Conclusion Comparatively, the two classifications presented a weak to moderate degree of agreement. Fraser classification had better agreement in both groups. The agreement was higher when evaluating orthopedic trauma physicians.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2021-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000400459Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.56 n.4 2021reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1055/s-0040-1713388info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlencar Neto,Jonatas BritoOsório Neto,Ernane BrunoSouza,Clodoaldo José Duarte deRocha,Pedro Henrique Messias daCavalcante,Maria Luzete CostaLopes,Márcio Bezerra Gadelhaeng2021-10-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162021000400459Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2021-10-06T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee
title Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee
spellingShingle Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee
Alencar Neto,Jonatas Brito
tibia fractures/ classification
validation studies
evaluation
title_short Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee
title_full Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee
title_sort Evaluation of the Interobserver Agreement of the Fraser and Blake & McBryde Classifications for Floating Knee
author Alencar Neto,Jonatas Brito
author_facet Alencar Neto,Jonatas Brito
Osório Neto,Ernane Bruno
Souza,Clodoaldo José Duarte de
Rocha,Pedro Henrique Messias da
Cavalcante,Maria Luzete Costa
Lopes,Márcio Bezerra Gadelha
author_role author
author2 Osório Neto,Ernane Bruno
Souza,Clodoaldo José Duarte de
Rocha,Pedro Henrique Messias da
Cavalcante,Maria Luzete Costa
Lopes,Márcio Bezerra Gadelha
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alencar Neto,Jonatas Brito
Osório Neto,Ernane Bruno
Souza,Clodoaldo José Duarte de
Rocha,Pedro Henrique Messias da
Cavalcante,Maria Luzete Costa
Lopes,Márcio Bezerra Gadelha
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv tibia fractures/ classification
validation studies
evaluation
topic tibia fractures/ classification
validation studies
evaluation
description Abstract Objective To evaluate the interobserver agreement of two classifications for floating knee: Fraser and Blake & McBryde. Method Thirty-two observers, subdivided according to the degree of titration (26 resident physicians and 6 orthopedic physicians specialized in orthopedic trauma), classified 15 fractures of the ipsilateral femur and tibia. Interobserver agreement was evaluated by using the Kappa coefficient. Result When evaluating the agreement between the 9 R1, a Kappa index of 0.58 was obtained for the Fraser classification and of 0.46 for the Blake & McBryde classification. Among the 7 R2, a rate of 0.59 was obtained for the Fraser rating and 0.51 for the Blake & McBryderating. Among the 10 R3, theagreement index was higher for both classifications: 0.72 for the Fraser and 0.71 for the Blake & McBryde classification. Considering the 3 groups (R1, R2, R3) as one large group, the general Kappa index was calculated, which resulted in 0.63for the Fraser classification and 0.56 for the Blake & McBryde classification. In the group of traumaand orthopedic knee specialists, in turn, an agreement of 0.597 was obtained for the Blake and McBryde classification and of 0.843 for the Fraser classification. Conclusion Comparatively, the two classifications presented a weak to moderate degree of agreement. Fraser classification had better agreement in both groups. The agreement was higher when evaluating orthopedic trauma physicians.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000400459
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000400459
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0040-1713388
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.56 n.4 2021
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbo@sbot.org.br
_version_ 1752122363160297472