End-of-life practices in patients admitted to pediatric intensive care units in Brazil: A retrospective study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Furtado,Roiter de Albernaz
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Tonial,Cristian Tedesco, Costa,Caroline Abud Drumond, Andrades,Gabriela Rupp Hanzen, Crestani,Francielly, Bruno,Francisco, Fiori,Humberto Holmer, Piva,Jefferson Pedro, Garcia,Pedro Celiny Ramos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572021000500525
Resumo: Abstract Objective: To determine the prevalence of life support limitation (LSL) in patients who died after at least 24 h of a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) stay, parent participation and to describe how this type of care is delivered. Methods: Retrospective cohort study in a tertiary PICU at a university hospital in Brazil. All patients aged 1 month to 18 years who died were eligible for inclusion. The exclusion criteria were those brain death and death within 24 h of admission. Results: 53 patients were included in the study. The prevalence of a LSL report was 45.3%. Out of 24 patients with a report of LSL on their medical records only 1 did not have a donot-resuscitate order. Half of the patients with a report of LSL had life support withdrawn. The length of their PICU stay, age, presence of parents at the time of death, and severity on admission, calculated by the Pediatric Index of Mortality 2, were higher in patients with a report of LSL. Compared with other historical cohorts, there was a clear increase in the prevalence of LSL and, most importantly, a change in how limitations are carried out, with a high prevalence of parental participation and an increase in withdrawal of life support. Conclusions: LSLs were associated with older and more severely ill patients, with a high prevalence of family participation in this process. The historical comparison showed an increase in LSL and in the withdrawal of life support.
id SBPE-1_41450a4e9948e190d98044e68147ce2a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0021-75572021000500525
network_acronym_str SBPE-1
network_name_str Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling End-of-life practices in patients admitted to pediatric intensive care units in Brazil: A retrospective studyIntensive care unitspediatricPalliative careTerminal careDeathMortalityChild careAbstract Objective: To determine the prevalence of life support limitation (LSL) in patients who died after at least 24 h of a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) stay, parent participation and to describe how this type of care is delivered. Methods: Retrospective cohort study in a tertiary PICU at a university hospital in Brazil. All patients aged 1 month to 18 years who died were eligible for inclusion. The exclusion criteria were those brain death and death within 24 h of admission. Results: 53 patients were included in the study. The prevalence of a LSL report was 45.3%. Out of 24 patients with a report of LSL on their medical records only 1 did not have a donot-resuscitate order. Half of the patients with a report of LSL had life support withdrawn. The length of their PICU stay, age, presence of parents at the time of death, and severity on admission, calculated by the Pediatric Index of Mortality 2, were higher in patients with a report of LSL. Compared with other historical cohorts, there was a clear increase in the prevalence of LSL and, most importantly, a change in how limitations are carried out, with a high prevalence of parental participation and an increase in withdrawal of life support. Conclusions: LSLs were associated with older and more severely ill patients, with a high prevalence of family participation in this process. The historical comparison showed an increase in LSL and in the withdrawal of life support.Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria2021-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572021000500525Jornal de Pediatria v.97 n.5 2021reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)instacron:SBPE10.1016/j.jped.2020.10.017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFurtado,Roiter de AlbernazTonial,Cristian TedescoCosta,Caroline Abud DrumondAndrades,Gabriela Rupp HanzenCrestani,FranciellyBruno,FranciscoFiori,Humberto HolmerPiva,Jefferson PedroGarcia,Pedro Celiny Ramoseng2021-10-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0021-75572021000500525Revistahttp://www.jped.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jped@jped.com.br1678-47820021-7557opendoar:2021-10-08T00:00Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv End-of-life practices in patients admitted to pediatric intensive care units in Brazil: A retrospective study
title End-of-life practices in patients admitted to pediatric intensive care units in Brazil: A retrospective study
spellingShingle End-of-life practices in patients admitted to pediatric intensive care units in Brazil: A retrospective study
Furtado,Roiter de Albernaz
Intensive care units
pediatric
Palliative care
Terminal care
Death
Mortality
Child care
title_short End-of-life practices in patients admitted to pediatric intensive care units in Brazil: A retrospective study
title_full End-of-life practices in patients admitted to pediatric intensive care units in Brazil: A retrospective study
title_fullStr End-of-life practices in patients admitted to pediatric intensive care units in Brazil: A retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed End-of-life practices in patients admitted to pediatric intensive care units in Brazil: A retrospective study
title_sort End-of-life practices in patients admitted to pediatric intensive care units in Brazil: A retrospective study
author Furtado,Roiter de Albernaz
author_facet Furtado,Roiter de Albernaz
Tonial,Cristian Tedesco
Costa,Caroline Abud Drumond
Andrades,Gabriela Rupp Hanzen
Crestani,Francielly
Bruno,Francisco
Fiori,Humberto Holmer
Piva,Jefferson Pedro
Garcia,Pedro Celiny Ramos
author_role author
author2 Tonial,Cristian Tedesco
Costa,Caroline Abud Drumond
Andrades,Gabriela Rupp Hanzen
Crestani,Francielly
Bruno,Francisco
Fiori,Humberto Holmer
Piva,Jefferson Pedro
Garcia,Pedro Celiny Ramos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Furtado,Roiter de Albernaz
Tonial,Cristian Tedesco
Costa,Caroline Abud Drumond
Andrades,Gabriela Rupp Hanzen
Crestani,Francielly
Bruno,Francisco
Fiori,Humberto Holmer
Piva,Jefferson Pedro
Garcia,Pedro Celiny Ramos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Intensive care units
pediatric
Palliative care
Terminal care
Death
Mortality
Child care
topic Intensive care units
pediatric
Palliative care
Terminal care
Death
Mortality
Child care
description Abstract Objective: To determine the prevalence of life support limitation (LSL) in patients who died after at least 24 h of a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) stay, parent participation and to describe how this type of care is delivered. Methods: Retrospective cohort study in a tertiary PICU at a university hospital in Brazil. All patients aged 1 month to 18 years who died were eligible for inclusion. The exclusion criteria were those brain death and death within 24 h of admission. Results: 53 patients were included in the study. The prevalence of a LSL report was 45.3%. Out of 24 patients with a report of LSL on their medical records only 1 did not have a donot-resuscitate order. Half of the patients with a report of LSL had life support withdrawn. The length of their PICU stay, age, presence of parents at the time of death, and severity on admission, calculated by the Pediatric Index of Mortality 2, were higher in patients with a report of LSL. Compared with other historical cohorts, there was a clear increase in the prevalence of LSL and, most importantly, a change in how limitations are carried out, with a high prevalence of parental participation and an increase in withdrawal of life support. Conclusions: LSLs were associated with older and more severely ill patients, with a high prevalence of family participation in this process. The historical comparison showed an increase in LSL and in the withdrawal of life support.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572021000500525
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572021000500525
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.jped.2020.10.017
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal de Pediatria v.97 n.5 2021
reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
instacron:SBPE
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
instacron_str SBPE
institution SBPE
reponame_str Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
collection Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jped@jped.com.br
_version_ 1752122322813190144