Does universal newborn hearing screening impact the timing of deafness treatment?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Faistauer,Marina
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Silva,Alice Lang, Dominguez,Daniela de Oliveira Ruiz, Bohn,Renata, Félix,Têmis Maria, Costa,Sady Selaimen da, Rosito,Letícia Petersen Schmidt
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572022000200147
Resumo: Abstract Objective: To evaluate the impact of the Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS) on the age at diagnosis, beginning of treatment, and first cochlear implant surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study with children up to 12 years old with bilateral hearing loss were divided into two groups: patients who underwent UNHS and the ones who didn't. The groups were compared according to their age at the beginning of the evaluation at a specialized center, at the beginning of the intervention, and, for the ones who had indication, at the cochlear implant surgery. The group who underwent UNHS was divided between the ones who passed the screening test and the ones who didn’t. They were compared according to their ages at the same moments as the first two groups. Results: 135 patients were included. The median age at the first appointment in a specialized center was 1.42 (0.50 and 2.50) years, at the beginning of treatment 2.00 (1.00 and 3.52) years, and the cochlear implant surgery 2.83 (1.83 and 4.66) years. Children who underwent UNHS were younger than those who didn't, at the three evaluated moments (p < 0.001). In a subanalysis, children who passed the UNHS but were later diagnosed with hearing loss reached the first appointment with a specialist and started treatment older than those who failed the tests. Conclusion: Performing UNHS interfered with the timing of deafness diagnosis and treatment. However, children who passed the screening but were later diagnosed with hearing loss were the category with the most important delay.
id SBPE-1_bd08e6c4c6403d38909397b7f0df583d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0021-75572022000200147
network_acronym_str SBPE-1
network_name_str Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Does universal newborn hearing screening impact the timing of deafness treatment?Neonatal hearing screeningHearing lossCochlear implantAbstract Objective: To evaluate the impact of the Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS) on the age at diagnosis, beginning of treatment, and first cochlear implant surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study with children up to 12 years old with bilateral hearing loss were divided into two groups: patients who underwent UNHS and the ones who didn't. The groups were compared according to their age at the beginning of the evaluation at a specialized center, at the beginning of the intervention, and, for the ones who had indication, at the cochlear implant surgery. The group who underwent UNHS was divided between the ones who passed the screening test and the ones who didn’t. They were compared according to their ages at the same moments as the first two groups. Results: 135 patients were included. The median age at the first appointment in a specialized center was 1.42 (0.50 and 2.50) years, at the beginning of treatment 2.00 (1.00 and 3.52) years, and the cochlear implant surgery 2.83 (1.83 and 4.66) years. Children who underwent UNHS were younger than those who didn't, at the three evaluated moments (p < 0.001). In a subanalysis, children who passed the UNHS but were later diagnosed with hearing loss reached the first appointment with a specialist and started treatment older than those who failed the tests. Conclusion: Performing UNHS interfered with the timing of deafness diagnosis and treatment. However, children who passed the screening but were later diagnosed with hearing loss were the category with the most important delay.Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria2022-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572022000200147Jornal de Pediatria v.98 n.2 2022reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)instacron:SBPE10.1016/j.jped.2021.04.008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaistauer,MarinaSilva,Alice LangDominguez,Daniela de Oliveira RuizBohn,RenataFélix,Têmis MariaCosta,Sady Selaimen daRosito,Letícia Petersen Schmidteng2022-04-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0021-75572022000200147Revistahttp://www.jped.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jped@jped.com.br1678-47820021-7557opendoar:2022-04-18T00:00Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does universal newborn hearing screening impact the timing of deafness treatment?
title Does universal newborn hearing screening impact the timing of deafness treatment?
spellingShingle Does universal newborn hearing screening impact the timing of deafness treatment?
Faistauer,Marina
Neonatal hearing screening
Hearing loss
Cochlear implant
title_short Does universal newborn hearing screening impact the timing of deafness treatment?
title_full Does universal newborn hearing screening impact the timing of deafness treatment?
title_fullStr Does universal newborn hearing screening impact the timing of deafness treatment?
title_full_unstemmed Does universal newborn hearing screening impact the timing of deafness treatment?
title_sort Does universal newborn hearing screening impact the timing of deafness treatment?
author Faistauer,Marina
author_facet Faistauer,Marina
Silva,Alice Lang
Dominguez,Daniela de Oliveira Ruiz
Bohn,Renata
Félix,Têmis Maria
Costa,Sady Selaimen da
Rosito,Letícia Petersen Schmidt
author_role author
author2 Silva,Alice Lang
Dominguez,Daniela de Oliveira Ruiz
Bohn,Renata
Félix,Têmis Maria
Costa,Sady Selaimen da
Rosito,Letícia Petersen Schmidt
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Faistauer,Marina
Silva,Alice Lang
Dominguez,Daniela de Oliveira Ruiz
Bohn,Renata
Félix,Têmis Maria
Costa,Sady Selaimen da
Rosito,Letícia Petersen Schmidt
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Neonatal hearing screening
Hearing loss
Cochlear implant
topic Neonatal hearing screening
Hearing loss
Cochlear implant
description Abstract Objective: To evaluate the impact of the Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS) on the age at diagnosis, beginning of treatment, and first cochlear implant surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study with children up to 12 years old with bilateral hearing loss were divided into two groups: patients who underwent UNHS and the ones who didn't. The groups were compared according to their age at the beginning of the evaluation at a specialized center, at the beginning of the intervention, and, for the ones who had indication, at the cochlear implant surgery. The group who underwent UNHS was divided between the ones who passed the screening test and the ones who didn’t. They were compared according to their ages at the same moments as the first two groups. Results: 135 patients were included. The median age at the first appointment in a specialized center was 1.42 (0.50 and 2.50) years, at the beginning of treatment 2.00 (1.00 and 3.52) years, and the cochlear implant surgery 2.83 (1.83 and 4.66) years. Children who underwent UNHS were younger than those who didn't, at the three evaluated moments (p < 0.001). In a subanalysis, children who passed the UNHS but were later diagnosed with hearing loss reached the first appointment with a specialist and started treatment older than those who failed the tests. Conclusion: Performing UNHS interfered with the timing of deafness diagnosis and treatment. However, children who passed the screening but were later diagnosed with hearing loss were the category with the most important delay.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572022000200147
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572022000200147
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.jped.2021.04.008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal de Pediatria v.98 n.2 2022
reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
instacron:SBPE
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
instacron_str SBPE
institution SBPE
reponame_str Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
collection Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jped@jped.com.br
_version_ 1752122323255689216