Assessment of simulated mandibular condyle bone lesions by cone beam computed tomography

• Main Author: Marques,Alexandre Perez
• Publication Date: 2010
• Other Authors: Perrella,Andréia, Arita,Emiko Saito, Pereira,Marlene Fenyo Soeiro de Matos, Cavalcanti,Marcelo de Gusmão Paraíso
• Format: Article
• Language: eng
• Source: Brazilian Oral Research
• Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242010000400016
• topic: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Protocols; Bone Diseases; Temporomandibular Joint

There are many limitations to image acquisition, using conventional radiography, of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) region. The Computed Tomography (CT) scan is a better option, due to its higher accuracy, for purposes of diagnosis, surgical planning and treatment of bone injuries. The aim of the present study was to analyze two protocols of cone beam computed tomography for the evaluation of simulated mandibular condyle bone lesions. Spherical lesions were simulated in 30 dry mandibular condyles, using dentist drills and drill bits sizes 1, 3 and 6. Each of the mandibular condyles was submitted to cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) using two protocols: 1) axial, coronal and sagittal multiplanar reconstruction (MPR); and 2) sagittal plus coronal slices throughout the longitudinal axis of the mandibular condyles. For these protocols, 2 observers analyzed the CBCT images independently, regarding the presence or not of injuries. Only one of the observers, however, performed on 2 different occasions. The results were compared to the gold standard, evaluating the percentage of agreement, degree of accuracy of CBCT protocols and observers' examination. The z test was used for the statistical analysis. The results showed there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 protocols. There was greater difficulty in the assessment of small-size simulated lesions (drill # 1). From the results of this study, it can be concluded that CBCT is an accurate tool for analyzing mandibular condyle bone lesions, with the MPR protocol showing slightly better results than the sagittal plus coronal slices throughout the longitudinal axis.