Are cloth masks a substitute to medical masks in reducing transmission and contamination? A systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos,Milena
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Torres,Darlyane, Cardoso,Paula Coutinho, Pandis,Nikolaos, Flores-Mir,Carlos, Medeiros,Rita, Normando,Antonio David
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242020000100402
Resumo: Abstract: During the COVID-19 pandemic the use of cloth masks has increased dramatically due to the shortage of medical masks. However, the efficiency of this material is controversial. We aimed to investigate the efficiency of cloth masks in reducing transmission and contamination by droplets and aerosols for the general population and healthcare workers. Electronic databases were searched without year or language restrictions. Clinical and laboratorial studies were included. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using an adapted quality checklist for laboratory-based studies. ROBINS-I tool and Cochrane RoB 2.0 were used to evaluate non-randomized (n-RCT) and randomized clinical trials (RCT), respectively. The quality of the evidence was assessed through GRADE tool. From the eleven studies selected, eight were laboratory-based studies, one non-randomized and one RCT supported by laboratory data. Between the evaluated fabrics only three presented a filtration efficiency > 90%. Hybrid of cotton/chiffon (95%CI 95.2 to 98.8), hybrid of cotton/silk (95%CI 92.2 to 95.8) and cotton quilt (95%CI 94.2 to 97.8). However, cloth masks are not recommended for healthcare workers. A meta-analysis was not feasible due to a high methodological heterogeneity. The overall quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Despite the lower efficiency compared to medical masks, laboratorial results may underestimate the efficiency of cloth masks in real life. Cloth mask efficiency is higher when made of hybrid fabrics (cotton/chiffon, cotton/silk) and cotton quilt, mainly with multiple layers.
id SBPQO-1_a0cf317b68a0c21ff4589844cf3dddde
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242020000100402
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Are cloth masks a substitute to medical masks in reducing transmission and contamination? A systematic reviewMasksPandemicsRespiratory Protective DevicesCoronavirusAbstract: During the COVID-19 pandemic the use of cloth masks has increased dramatically due to the shortage of medical masks. However, the efficiency of this material is controversial. We aimed to investigate the efficiency of cloth masks in reducing transmission and contamination by droplets and aerosols for the general population and healthcare workers. Electronic databases were searched without year or language restrictions. Clinical and laboratorial studies were included. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using an adapted quality checklist for laboratory-based studies. ROBINS-I tool and Cochrane RoB 2.0 were used to evaluate non-randomized (n-RCT) and randomized clinical trials (RCT), respectively. The quality of the evidence was assessed through GRADE tool. From the eleven studies selected, eight were laboratory-based studies, one non-randomized and one RCT supported by laboratory data. Between the evaluated fabrics only three presented a filtration efficiency > 90%. Hybrid of cotton/chiffon (95%CI 95.2 to 98.8), hybrid of cotton/silk (95%CI 92.2 to 95.8) and cotton quilt (95%CI 94.2 to 97.8). However, cloth masks are not recommended for healthcare workers. A meta-analysis was not feasible due to a high methodological heterogeneity. The overall quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Despite the lower efficiency compared to medical masks, laboratorial results may underestimate the efficiency of cloth masks in real life. Cloth mask efficiency is higher when made of hybrid fabrics (cotton/chiffon, cotton/silk) and cotton quilt, mainly with multiple layers.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242020000100402Brazilian Oral Research v.34 2020reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0123info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,MilenaTorres,DarlyaneCardoso,Paula CoutinhoPandis,NikolaosFlores-Mir,CarlosMedeiros,RitaNormando,Antonio Davideng2020-10-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242020000100402Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2020-10-28T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are cloth masks a substitute to medical masks in reducing transmission and contamination? A systematic review
title Are cloth masks a substitute to medical masks in reducing transmission and contamination? A systematic review
spellingShingle Are cloth masks a substitute to medical masks in reducing transmission and contamination? A systematic review
Santos,Milena
Masks
Pandemics
Respiratory Protective Devices
Coronavirus
title_short Are cloth masks a substitute to medical masks in reducing transmission and contamination? A systematic review
title_full Are cloth masks a substitute to medical masks in reducing transmission and contamination? A systematic review
title_fullStr Are cloth masks a substitute to medical masks in reducing transmission and contamination? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Are cloth masks a substitute to medical masks in reducing transmission and contamination? A systematic review
title_sort Are cloth masks a substitute to medical masks in reducing transmission and contamination? A systematic review
author Santos,Milena
author_facet Santos,Milena
Torres,Darlyane
Cardoso,Paula Coutinho
Pandis,Nikolaos
Flores-Mir,Carlos
Medeiros,Rita
Normando,Antonio David
author_role author
author2 Torres,Darlyane
Cardoso,Paula Coutinho
Pandis,Nikolaos
Flores-Mir,Carlos
Medeiros,Rita
Normando,Antonio David
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos,Milena
Torres,Darlyane
Cardoso,Paula Coutinho
Pandis,Nikolaos
Flores-Mir,Carlos
Medeiros,Rita
Normando,Antonio David
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Masks
Pandemics
Respiratory Protective Devices
Coronavirus
topic Masks
Pandemics
Respiratory Protective Devices
Coronavirus
description Abstract: During the COVID-19 pandemic the use of cloth masks has increased dramatically due to the shortage of medical masks. However, the efficiency of this material is controversial. We aimed to investigate the efficiency of cloth masks in reducing transmission and contamination by droplets and aerosols for the general population and healthcare workers. Electronic databases were searched without year or language restrictions. Clinical and laboratorial studies were included. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using an adapted quality checklist for laboratory-based studies. ROBINS-I tool and Cochrane RoB 2.0 were used to evaluate non-randomized (n-RCT) and randomized clinical trials (RCT), respectively. The quality of the evidence was assessed through GRADE tool. From the eleven studies selected, eight were laboratory-based studies, one non-randomized and one RCT supported by laboratory data. Between the evaluated fabrics only three presented a filtration efficiency > 90%. Hybrid of cotton/chiffon (95%CI 95.2 to 98.8), hybrid of cotton/silk (95%CI 92.2 to 95.8) and cotton quilt (95%CI 94.2 to 97.8). However, cloth masks are not recommended for healthcare workers. A meta-analysis was not feasible due to a high methodological heterogeneity. The overall quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Despite the lower efficiency compared to medical masks, laboratorial results may underestimate the efficiency of cloth masks in real life. Cloth mask efficiency is higher when made of hybrid fabrics (cotton/chiffon, cotton/silk) and cotton quilt, mainly with multiple layers.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242020000100402
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242020000100402
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0123
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.34 2020
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318327200219136