Can implant surfaces affect implant stability during osseointegration? A randomized clinical trial
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2018 |
Other Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Brazilian Oral Research |
Download full: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100286 |
Summary: | Abstract This randomized clinical trial evaluated the insertion torque (IT), primary, and secondary stability of dental implants with different surface treatments during the osseointegration period. Nineteen patients with bilateral partial edentulism in the posterior mandibular region were randomly allocated to two implant brand groups and received implants with different surface treatments in the opposite site of the arch: Osseotite and Nanotite or SLA and SLActive. During implant placement, the maximum IT was recorded using a surgical motor equipped with a graphical user interface. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was assessed immediately after the IT, and was measured weekly via resonance frequency analysis during 3 months. The data were analyzed by a one-way ANOVA, the Bonferroni test, paired t tests and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. The IT values were similar (p > 0.05) for all implant types ranging from 43.82 ± 6.50 to 46.84 ± 5.06. All implant types behaved similarly until the 28th day (p > 0.05). Between 35 and 56 days, Osseotite and SLActive showed lower ISQ values (p < 0.001) compared to Nanotite and SLA implants. After 56 days, only Osseotite maintained significantly lower ISQ values than the other implants (p < 0.05). After 91 days the ISQ values were significantly higher than the baseline for all four implant types (p < 0.001). The ISQ and IT values were significantly correlated at the baseline and at the final evaluation for Osseotite, Nanotite, and SLActive implants (p < 0.001). After 91 days, ISQ and IT values were only significantly correlated for the Osseotite implants (p < 0.05). All implants types exhibited acceptable primary and secondary stability. |
id |
SBPQO-1_c7b8b29307cc6635d141c11f54d76f46 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1806-83242018000100286 |
network_acronym_str |
SBPQO-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Can implant surfaces affect implant stability during osseointegration? A randomized clinical trialDental ImplantsRandomized Clinical Trials as TopicJaw, Edentulous, PartiallyAbstract This randomized clinical trial evaluated the insertion torque (IT), primary, and secondary stability of dental implants with different surface treatments during the osseointegration period. Nineteen patients with bilateral partial edentulism in the posterior mandibular region were randomly allocated to two implant brand groups and received implants with different surface treatments in the opposite site of the arch: Osseotite and Nanotite or SLA and SLActive. During implant placement, the maximum IT was recorded using a surgical motor equipped with a graphical user interface. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was assessed immediately after the IT, and was measured weekly via resonance frequency analysis during 3 months. The data were analyzed by a one-way ANOVA, the Bonferroni test, paired t tests and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. The IT values were similar (p > 0.05) for all implant types ranging from 43.82 ± 6.50 to 46.84 ± 5.06. All implant types behaved similarly until the 28th day (p > 0.05). Between 35 and 56 days, Osseotite and SLActive showed lower ISQ values (p < 0.001) compared to Nanotite and SLA implants. After 56 days, only Osseotite maintained significantly lower ISQ values than the other implants (p < 0.05). After 91 days the ISQ values were significantly higher than the baseline for all four implant types (p < 0.001). The ISQ and IT values were significantly correlated at the baseline and at the final evaluation for Osseotite, Nanotite, and SLActive implants (p < 0.001). After 91 days, ISQ and IT values were only significantly correlated for the Osseotite implants (p < 0.05). All implants types exhibited acceptable primary and secondary stability.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100286Brazilian Oral Research v.32 2018reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0110info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCARMO FILHO,Luiz Carlos doMARCELLO-MACHADO,Raissa MicaellaCASTILHOS,Eduardo Dickie deDEL BEL CURY,Altair AntoninhaFAOT,Fernandaeng2018-10-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242018000100286Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2018-10-22T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Can implant surfaces affect implant stability during osseointegration? A randomized clinical trial |
title |
Can implant surfaces affect implant stability during osseointegration? A randomized clinical trial |
spellingShingle |
Can implant surfaces affect implant stability during osseointegration? A randomized clinical trial CARMO FILHO,Luiz Carlos do Dental Implants Randomized Clinical Trials as Topic Jaw, Edentulous, Partially |
title_short |
Can implant surfaces affect implant stability during osseointegration? A randomized clinical trial |
title_full |
Can implant surfaces affect implant stability during osseointegration? A randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr |
Can implant surfaces affect implant stability during osseointegration? A randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can implant surfaces affect implant stability during osseointegration? A randomized clinical trial |
title_sort |
Can implant surfaces affect implant stability during osseointegration? A randomized clinical trial |
author |
CARMO FILHO,Luiz Carlos do |
author_facet |
CARMO FILHO,Luiz Carlos do MARCELLO-MACHADO,Raissa Micaella CASTILHOS,Eduardo Dickie de DEL BEL CURY,Altair Antoninha FAOT,Fernanda |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
MARCELLO-MACHADO,Raissa Micaella CASTILHOS,Eduardo Dickie de DEL BEL CURY,Altair Antoninha FAOT,Fernanda |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
CARMO FILHO,Luiz Carlos do MARCELLO-MACHADO,Raissa Micaella CASTILHOS,Eduardo Dickie de DEL BEL CURY,Altair Antoninha FAOT,Fernanda |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental Implants Randomized Clinical Trials as Topic Jaw, Edentulous, Partially |
topic |
Dental Implants Randomized Clinical Trials as Topic Jaw, Edentulous, Partially |
description |
Abstract This randomized clinical trial evaluated the insertion torque (IT), primary, and secondary stability of dental implants with different surface treatments during the osseointegration period. Nineteen patients with bilateral partial edentulism in the posterior mandibular region were randomly allocated to two implant brand groups and received implants with different surface treatments in the opposite site of the arch: Osseotite and Nanotite or SLA and SLActive. During implant placement, the maximum IT was recorded using a surgical motor equipped with a graphical user interface. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was assessed immediately after the IT, and was measured weekly via resonance frequency analysis during 3 months. The data were analyzed by a one-way ANOVA, the Bonferroni test, paired t tests and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. The IT values were similar (p > 0.05) for all implant types ranging from 43.82 ± 6.50 to 46.84 ± 5.06. All implant types behaved similarly until the 28th day (p > 0.05). Between 35 and 56 days, Osseotite and SLActive showed lower ISQ values (p < 0.001) compared to Nanotite and SLA implants. After 56 days, only Osseotite maintained significantly lower ISQ values than the other implants (p < 0.05). After 91 days the ISQ values were significantly higher than the baseline for all four implant types (p < 0.001). The ISQ and IT values were significantly correlated at the baseline and at the final evaluation for Osseotite, Nanotite, and SLActive implants (p < 0.001). After 91 days, ISQ and IT values were only significantly correlated for the Osseotite implants (p < 0.05). All implants types exhibited acceptable primary and secondary stability. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100286 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100286 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0110 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research v.32 2018 reponame:Brazilian Oral Research instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) instacron:SBPQO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
instacron_str |
SBPQO |
institution |
SBPQO |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
collection |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318326128574464 |