Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa,Moacir Guilherme da
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Pazzini,Camila Alessandra, Pantuzo,Mariele Cristina Garcia, Jorge,Maria Letícia Ramos, Marques,Leandro Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242013000200183
Resumo: The present systematic review was performed to investigate if there is evidence justifying the prophylactic extraction of third molars, one of the most frequent procedures in oral surgery. A series of searches was carried out for randomized, clinical trials and systematic reviews in seven databases (MEDLINE, BBO, LILACS, Web of Science, EMBASE, BIREME and Cochrane Library), with no restrictions regarding year or language. A supplemental manual search of the references of retrieved articles was also performed. The search strategy resulted in 260 papers. Both the data extracted and the quality of each paper were evaluated independently by two reviewers. After selection based on the preestablished eligibility criteria, four papers qualified for the final analysis. A medium degree of quality and methodological consistency was found in three studies, and low quality was found in one study. No studies showed a high degree of consistency. The most significant flaw was an inadequate sample size. The results of the present review indicate a lack of scientific evidence to justify the indication of the prophylactic extraction of third molars.
id SBPQO-1_de50abe67f1ef187f7d74bb8512da777
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242013000200183
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic reviewTooth ExtractionMolar, ThirdPathologyCrowdingThe present systematic review was performed to investigate if there is evidence justifying the prophylactic extraction of third molars, one of the most frequent procedures in oral surgery. A series of searches was carried out for randomized, clinical trials and systematic reviews in seven databases (MEDLINE, BBO, LILACS, Web of Science, EMBASE, BIREME and Cochrane Library), with no restrictions regarding year or language. A supplemental manual search of the references of retrieved articles was also performed. The search strategy resulted in 260 papers. Both the data extracted and the quality of each paper were evaluated independently by two reviewers. After selection based on the preestablished eligibility criteria, four papers qualified for the final analysis. A medium degree of quality and methodological consistency was found in three studies, and low quality was found in one study. No studies showed a high degree of consistency. The most significant flaw was an inadequate sample size. The results of the present review indicate a lack of scientific evidence to justify the indication of the prophylactic extraction of third molars.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2013-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242013000200183Brazilian Oral Research v.27 n.2 2013reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/S1806-83242013000100024info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta,Moacir Guilherme daPazzini,Camila AlessandraPantuzo,Mariele Cristina GarciaJorge,Maria Letícia RamosMarques,Leandro Silvaeng2013-05-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242013000200183Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2013-05-28T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review
title Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review
spellingShingle Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review
Costa,Moacir Guilherme da
Tooth Extraction
Molar, Third
Pathology
Crowding
title_short Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review
title_full Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review
title_fullStr Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review
title_sort Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review
author Costa,Moacir Guilherme da
author_facet Costa,Moacir Guilherme da
Pazzini,Camila Alessandra
Pantuzo,Mariele Cristina Garcia
Jorge,Maria Letícia Ramos
Marques,Leandro Silva
author_role author
author2 Pazzini,Camila Alessandra
Pantuzo,Mariele Cristina Garcia
Jorge,Maria Letícia Ramos
Marques,Leandro Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa,Moacir Guilherme da
Pazzini,Camila Alessandra
Pantuzo,Mariele Cristina Garcia
Jorge,Maria Letícia Ramos
Marques,Leandro Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tooth Extraction
Molar, Third
Pathology
Crowding
topic Tooth Extraction
Molar, Third
Pathology
Crowding
description The present systematic review was performed to investigate if there is evidence justifying the prophylactic extraction of third molars, one of the most frequent procedures in oral surgery. A series of searches was carried out for randomized, clinical trials and systematic reviews in seven databases (MEDLINE, BBO, LILACS, Web of Science, EMBASE, BIREME and Cochrane Library), with no restrictions regarding year or language. A supplemental manual search of the references of retrieved articles was also performed. The search strategy resulted in 260 papers. Both the data extracted and the quality of each paper were evaluated independently by two reviewers. After selection based on the preestablished eligibility criteria, four papers qualified for the final analysis. A medium degree of quality and methodological consistency was found in three studies, and low quality was found in one study. No studies showed a high degree of consistency. The most significant flaw was an inadequate sample size. The results of the present review indicate a lack of scientific evidence to justify the indication of the prophylactic extraction of third molars.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242013000200183
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242013000200183
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1806-83242013000100024
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.27 n.2 2013
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318323361382400

Registros relacionados