Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Batista,Diane R
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Floriano,Idevaldo, Silvinato,Antonio, Bacha,Hélio A, Barbosa,Alexandre N, Tanni,Suzana E, Bernardo,Wanderley M
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132022000401200
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To answer questions related to the use of anticoagulants in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials comparing the use of anticoagulants in non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to January 22, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Results: A total of 401 studies were initially selected. Of those, 9 met the inclusion criteria and were therefore analyzed (a total of 6,004 patients being analyzed). In non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, no significant difference was found between post-discharge prophylactic anticoagulation and no intervention regarding venous thromboembolism or bleeding at 30 days. In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, full anticoagulation resulted in a slight reduction in thrombotic events at 30 days (risk difference, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.00; p = 0.04; I2 = 78%), the quality of evidence being moderate. However, no significant difference was found between full anticoagulation and no intervention regarding the risk of major bleeding, the quality of evidence being very low. No significant difference was found between intermediate- and standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (risk difference, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.07 to 0.06; p = 0.81; I2 = 0%), the quality of evidence being very low. Conclusions: Therapeutic anticoagulation appears to have no effect on mortality in COVID-19 patients, resulting in a slight reduction in venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients.
id SBPT-1_b1dfb52afbbfdc47008fa0412a207969
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-37132022000401200
network_acronym_str SBPT-1
network_name_str Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysisAnticoagulantsCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT Objective: To answer questions related to the use of anticoagulants in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials comparing the use of anticoagulants in non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to January 22, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Results: A total of 401 studies were initially selected. Of those, 9 met the inclusion criteria and were therefore analyzed (a total of 6,004 patients being analyzed). In non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, no significant difference was found between post-discharge prophylactic anticoagulation and no intervention regarding venous thromboembolism or bleeding at 30 days. In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, full anticoagulation resulted in a slight reduction in thrombotic events at 30 days (risk difference, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.00; p = 0.04; I2 = 78%), the quality of evidence being moderate. However, no significant difference was found between full anticoagulation and no intervention regarding the risk of major bleeding, the quality of evidence being very low. No significant difference was found between intermediate- and standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (risk difference, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.07 to 0.06; p = 0.81; I2 = 0%), the quality of evidence being very low. Conclusions: Therapeutic anticoagulation appears to have no effect on mortality in COVID-19 patients, resulting in a slight reduction in venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients.Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132022000401200Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia v.48 n.4 2022reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)instacron:SBPT10.36416/1806-3756/e20220041info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBatista,Diane RFloriano,IdevaldoSilvinato,AntonioBacha,Hélio ABarbosa,Alexandre NTanni,Suzana EBernardo,Wanderley Meng2022-06-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-37132022000401200Revistahttp://www.jornaldepneumologia.com.br/default.aspONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jbp@jbp.org.br|| jpneumo@jornaldepneumologia.com.br1806-37561806-3713opendoar:2022-06-02T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
title Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
Batista,Diane R
Anticoagulants
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
title_short Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Use of anticoagulants in patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review and meta-analysis
author Batista,Diane R
author_facet Batista,Diane R
Floriano,Idevaldo
Silvinato,Antonio
Bacha,Hélio A
Barbosa,Alexandre N
Tanni,Suzana E
Bernardo,Wanderley M
author_role author
author2 Floriano,Idevaldo
Silvinato,Antonio
Bacha,Hélio A
Barbosa,Alexandre N
Tanni,Suzana E
Bernardo,Wanderley M
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Batista,Diane R
Floriano,Idevaldo
Silvinato,Antonio
Bacha,Hélio A
Barbosa,Alexandre N
Tanni,Suzana E
Bernardo,Wanderley M
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anticoagulants
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
topic Anticoagulants
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
description ABSTRACT Objective: To answer questions related to the use of anticoagulants in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials comparing the use of anticoagulants in non-hospitalized and hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to January 22, 2022. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the quality of evidence was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Results: A total of 401 studies were initially selected. Of those, 9 met the inclusion criteria and were therefore analyzed (a total of 6,004 patients being analyzed). In non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, no significant difference was found between post-discharge prophylactic anticoagulation and no intervention regarding venous thromboembolism or bleeding at 30 days. In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, full anticoagulation resulted in a slight reduction in thrombotic events at 30 days (risk difference, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.00; p = 0.04; I2 = 78%), the quality of evidence being moderate. However, no significant difference was found between full anticoagulation and no intervention regarding the risk of major bleeding, the quality of evidence being very low. No significant difference was found between intermediate- and standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (risk difference, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.07 to 0.06; p = 0.81; I2 = 0%), the quality of evidence being very low. Conclusions: Therapeutic anticoagulation appears to have no effect on mortality in COVID-19 patients, resulting in a slight reduction in venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132022000401200
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132022000401200
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.36416/1806-3756/e20220041
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia v.48 n.4 2022
reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
instacron:SBPT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
instacron_str SBPT
institution SBPT
reponame_str Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
collection Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jbp@jbp.org.br|| jpneumo@jornaldepneumologia.com.br
_version_ 1750318348295471104