Impact of local treatment on overall survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carneiro,Arie
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Baccaglini,Willy, Glina,Felipe P.A., Kayano,Paulo P., Nunes,Victor M., Smaletz,Oren, Bernardo,Wanderley Marques, Carvalho,Icaro Thiago de, Lemos,Gustavo Caserta
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000400588
Resumo: ABSTRACT Context Currently, standard treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer (MPCa) is androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Recent studies suggested that local treatment of MPCa is related to increase of survival of those patients, as observed in other tumors. Objective To evaluate the impact of local treatment on overall survival and cancer specific survival in 3 and 5 years in patients with MPCa. Materials and Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies published at PubMed, Scielo, Lilacs, Cochrane and EMBASE databases until June 2016. Several large cohorts and Post-Roc studies were included, that evaluated patients with MPCa submitted to local treatment (LT) using radiotherapy (RDT), surgery (RP) or brachytherapy (BCT) or not submitted to local treatment (NLT). Results 34.338 patients were analyzed in six included papers, 31.653 submitted to NLT and 2.685 to LT. Overall survival in three years was significantly higher in patients submitted to LT versus NLT (64.2% vs. 44.5%; RD 0.19, 95% CI, 0.17-0.21; p<0.00001; I2=0%), as well as in five years (51.9% vs. 23.6%; RD 0.30, 95% CI, 0.11-0.49; p<0.00001; I2=97%). Sensitive analysis according to type of local treatment showed that surgery (78.2% and 45.0%; RD 0.31, 95% CI, 0.26-0.35; p<0.00001; I2=50%) and radiotherapy (60.4% and 44.5%; RD 0.17, 95% CI, 0.12-0.22; p<0.00001; I2=67%) presented better outcomes. Conclusion LT using RDT, RP or BCT seems to significantly improve overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with metastatic prostatic cancer. Prospective and randomized studies must be performed in order to confirm our results.
id SBU-1_e5201ec983b3368983cf904022558156
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382017000400588
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Impact of local treatment on overall survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysisProstateSurvivalRadiation OncologyProstatic NeoplasmsABSTRACT Context Currently, standard treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer (MPCa) is androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Recent studies suggested that local treatment of MPCa is related to increase of survival of those patients, as observed in other tumors. Objective To evaluate the impact of local treatment on overall survival and cancer specific survival in 3 and 5 years in patients with MPCa. Materials and Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies published at PubMed, Scielo, Lilacs, Cochrane and EMBASE databases until June 2016. Several large cohorts and Post-Roc studies were included, that evaluated patients with MPCa submitted to local treatment (LT) using radiotherapy (RDT), surgery (RP) or brachytherapy (BCT) or not submitted to local treatment (NLT). Results 34.338 patients were analyzed in six included papers, 31.653 submitted to NLT and 2.685 to LT. Overall survival in three years was significantly higher in patients submitted to LT versus NLT (64.2% vs. 44.5%; RD 0.19, 95% CI, 0.17-0.21; p<0.00001; I2=0%), as well as in five years (51.9% vs. 23.6%; RD 0.30, 95% CI, 0.11-0.49; p<0.00001; I2=97%). Sensitive analysis according to type of local treatment showed that surgery (78.2% and 45.0%; RD 0.31, 95% CI, 0.26-0.35; p<0.00001; I2=50%) and radiotherapy (60.4% and 44.5%; RD 0.17, 95% CI, 0.12-0.22; p<0.00001; I2=67%) presented better outcomes. Conclusion LT using RDT, RP or BCT seems to significantly improve overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with metastatic prostatic cancer. Prospective and randomized studies must be performed in order to confirm our results.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000400588International braz j urol v.43 n.4 2017reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0483info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarneiro,ArieBaccaglini,WillyGlina,Felipe P.A.Kayano,Paulo P.Nunes,Victor M.Smaletz,OrenBernardo,Wanderley MarquesCarvalho,Icaro Thiago deLemos,Gustavo Casertaeng2017-08-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382017000400588Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2017-08-17T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Impact of local treatment on overall survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Impact of local treatment on overall survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Impact of local treatment on overall survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
Carneiro,Arie
Prostate
Survival
Radiation Oncology
Prostatic Neoplasms
title_short Impact of local treatment on overall survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Impact of local treatment on overall survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Impact of local treatment on overall survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of local treatment on overall survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Impact of local treatment on overall survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
author Carneiro,Arie
author_facet Carneiro,Arie
Baccaglini,Willy
Glina,Felipe P.A.
Kayano,Paulo P.
Nunes,Victor M.
Smaletz,Oren
Bernardo,Wanderley Marques
Carvalho,Icaro Thiago de
Lemos,Gustavo Caserta
author_role author
author2 Baccaglini,Willy
Glina,Felipe P.A.
Kayano,Paulo P.
Nunes,Victor M.
Smaletz,Oren
Bernardo,Wanderley Marques
Carvalho,Icaro Thiago de
Lemos,Gustavo Caserta
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carneiro,Arie
Baccaglini,Willy
Glina,Felipe P.A.
Kayano,Paulo P.
Nunes,Victor M.
Smaletz,Oren
Bernardo,Wanderley Marques
Carvalho,Icaro Thiago de
Lemos,Gustavo Caserta
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Prostate
Survival
Radiation Oncology
Prostatic Neoplasms
topic Prostate
Survival
Radiation Oncology
Prostatic Neoplasms
description ABSTRACT Context Currently, standard treatment of metastatic prostatic cancer (MPCa) is androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Recent studies suggested that local treatment of MPCa is related to increase of survival of those patients, as observed in other tumors. Objective To evaluate the impact of local treatment on overall survival and cancer specific survival in 3 and 5 years in patients with MPCa. Materials and Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies published at PubMed, Scielo, Lilacs, Cochrane and EMBASE databases until June 2016. Several large cohorts and Post-Roc studies were included, that evaluated patients with MPCa submitted to local treatment (LT) using radiotherapy (RDT), surgery (RP) or brachytherapy (BCT) or not submitted to local treatment (NLT). Results 34.338 patients were analyzed in six included papers, 31.653 submitted to NLT and 2.685 to LT. Overall survival in three years was significantly higher in patients submitted to LT versus NLT (64.2% vs. 44.5%; RD 0.19, 95% CI, 0.17-0.21; p<0.00001; I2=0%), as well as in five years (51.9% vs. 23.6%; RD 0.30, 95% CI, 0.11-0.49; p<0.00001; I2=97%). Sensitive analysis according to type of local treatment showed that surgery (78.2% and 45.0%; RD 0.31, 95% CI, 0.26-0.35; p<0.00001; I2=50%) and radiotherapy (60.4% and 44.5%; RD 0.17, 95% CI, 0.12-0.22; p<0.00001; I2=67%) presented better outcomes. Conclusion LT using RDT, RP or BCT seems to significantly improve overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with metastatic prostatic cancer. Prospective and randomized studies must be performed in order to confirm our results.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000400588
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000400588
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0483
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.43 n.4 2017
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318075485356032