The economic impact of infection with Eimeria spp. in broiler farms from Romania
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982016000500273 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT A survey was conducted on chicken broiler farms from Romania in August-November 2010 to evaluate economic losses due to coccidiosis. Data were collected from six broiler farms of different capacity regarding chemoprophylaxis program, weight gain, feed conversion, and mortality, for two previous flocks in two houses of each farm, and finally we evaluated the economic losses. Also, faeces samples were collected and oocysts were classified according to their size, and virulence of each Eimeria spp. field isolate was determined by lesion scoring. Correlations between economic performance, oocysts category, and virulence of Eimeria were assessed by multiple linear regression. Total economic losses per 24 flocks of 18,000 chicks each were about €37,948.2, with an average of €3,162.4 per flock, and they were caused by mortality (34.8%) and poor feed conversion (65.2%). Poor body weight gain was associated with AM oocyst category (presumptively E. acervulina and/or E. mitis), high lesion score in the duodenum, and coccidiostat used for chemoprophylaxis. Feed conversion ratio was linked to the same parameters as body weight gain, minus chemoprophylaxis programme, plus total lesion score. The percentage of mortality was influenced by the lesion score in the caecum and total lesion score. Statistical analysis showed that epidemiological survey of broiler flocks during the grower period can help the farmer to avoid important economic losses due to coccidiosis. As in other countries, the economic losses caused by coccidiosis in Romania are important, and a good prophylaxis programme can reduce the economic impact of coccidiosis. |
id |
SBZ-1_06eb39cbe3151dda0f52aeb3204e2c1a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-35982016000500273 |
network_acronym_str |
SBZ-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The economic impact of infection with Eimeria spp. in broiler farms from Romaniabody weight gainchickensfeed conversion ratiolossesABSTRACT A survey was conducted on chicken broiler farms from Romania in August-November 2010 to evaluate economic losses due to coccidiosis. Data were collected from six broiler farms of different capacity regarding chemoprophylaxis program, weight gain, feed conversion, and mortality, for two previous flocks in two houses of each farm, and finally we evaluated the economic losses. Also, faeces samples were collected and oocysts were classified according to their size, and virulence of each Eimeria spp. field isolate was determined by lesion scoring. Correlations between economic performance, oocysts category, and virulence of Eimeria were assessed by multiple linear regression. Total economic losses per 24 flocks of 18,000 chicks each were about €37,948.2, with an average of €3,162.4 per flock, and they were caused by mortality (34.8%) and poor feed conversion (65.2%). Poor body weight gain was associated with AM oocyst category (presumptively E. acervulina and/or E. mitis), high lesion score in the duodenum, and coccidiostat used for chemoprophylaxis. Feed conversion ratio was linked to the same parameters as body weight gain, minus chemoprophylaxis programme, plus total lesion score. The percentage of mortality was influenced by the lesion score in the caecum and total lesion score. Statistical analysis showed that epidemiological survey of broiler flocks during the grower period can help the farmer to avoid important economic losses due to coccidiosis. As in other countries, the economic losses caused by coccidiosis in Romania are important, and a good prophylaxis programme can reduce the economic impact of coccidiosis.Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia2016-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982016000500273Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.45 n.5 2016reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.1590/S1806-92902016000500010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGyörke,AdrianaKalmár,ZsuzsaPop,Loredana MariaŞuteu,Ovidiu Loaneng2016-06-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-35982016000500273Revistahttps://www.rbz.org.br/pt-br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br1806-92901516-3598opendoar:2016-06-02T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The economic impact of infection with Eimeria spp. in broiler farms from Romania |
title |
The economic impact of infection with Eimeria spp. in broiler farms from Romania |
spellingShingle |
The economic impact of infection with Eimeria spp. in broiler farms from Romania Györke,Adriana body weight gain chickens feed conversion ratio losses |
title_short |
The economic impact of infection with Eimeria spp. in broiler farms from Romania |
title_full |
The economic impact of infection with Eimeria spp. in broiler farms from Romania |
title_fullStr |
The economic impact of infection with Eimeria spp. in broiler farms from Romania |
title_full_unstemmed |
The economic impact of infection with Eimeria spp. in broiler farms from Romania |
title_sort |
The economic impact of infection with Eimeria spp. in broiler farms from Romania |
author |
Györke,Adriana |
author_facet |
Györke,Adriana Kalmár,Zsuzsa Pop,Loredana Maria Şuteu,Ovidiu Loan |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kalmár,Zsuzsa Pop,Loredana Maria Şuteu,Ovidiu Loan |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Györke,Adriana Kalmár,Zsuzsa Pop,Loredana Maria Şuteu,Ovidiu Loan |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
body weight gain chickens feed conversion ratio losses |
topic |
body weight gain chickens feed conversion ratio losses |
description |
ABSTRACT A survey was conducted on chicken broiler farms from Romania in August-November 2010 to evaluate economic losses due to coccidiosis. Data were collected from six broiler farms of different capacity regarding chemoprophylaxis program, weight gain, feed conversion, and mortality, for two previous flocks in two houses of each farm, and finally we evaluated the economic losses. Also, faeces samples were collected and oocysts were classified according to their size, and virulence of each Eimeria spp. field isolate was determined by lesion scoring. Correlations between economic performance, oocysts category, and virulence of Eimeria were assessed by multiple linear regression. Total economic losses per 24 flocks of 18,000 chicks each were about €37,948.2, with an average of €3,162.4 per flock, and they were caused by mortality (34.8%) and poor feed conversion (65.2%). Poor body weight gain was associated with AM oocyst category (presumptively E. acervulina and/or E. mitis), high lesion score in the duodenum, and coccidiostat used for chemoprophylaxis. Feed conversion ratio was linked to the same parameters as body weight gain, minus chemoprophylaxis programme, plus total lesion score. The percentage of mortality was influenced by the lesion score in the caecum and total lesion score. Statistical analysis showed that epidemiological survey of broiler flocks during the grower period can help the farmer to avoid important economic losses due to coccidiosis. As in other countries, the economic losses caused by coccidiosis in Romania are important, and a good prophylaxis programme can reduce the economic impact of coccidiosis. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-05-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982016000500273 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982016000500273 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1806-92902016000500010 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.45 n.5 2016 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) instacron:SBZ |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) |
instacron_str |
SBZ |
institution |
SBZ |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318151817494528 |