Phytogenic feed additives in piglets challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bruno,Daniel Gonçalves
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Martins,Simone Maria Massami Kitamura, Parazzi,Larissa José, Afonso,Esther Ramalho, Del Santo,Tácia Antunes, Teixeira,Sergio de Mello Novita, Moreno,Andrea Micke, Moretti,Aníbal de Sant'Anna
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982013000200009
Resumo: The effects of phytogenic feed additives on piglet performance and fecal score (FDD), as well as on lipid oxidation of pork meat were evaluated. One hundred and twenty crossbred weaned piglets were randomly assigned to six treatments according to a 2 × 3 factorial design with five replicates per treatment. Factors were: challenge with Salmonella Typhimurium at 35 days of age or no challenge, and three different additives (control (CTR), basal diet; phytogenic feed additives (PHY), basal diet plus 2000 ppm of phytogenic feed additives - Rosmarinus officinalis, Mentha piperita, Lippia sidoides and Porophyllum ruderale; and antimicrobial agent (ATB), basal diet plus 100 ppm of tylosin, 2000 ppm of zinc and colistin sulfate, 30 ppm in the pre-starter basal diet, 10 ppm in the starter basal diet I and II, and 5 ppm in growth and finishing basal diet). Body weight (BW) of the piglets of ATB was greater throughout the experimental period, without any differences detected between CTR and PHY. Nevertheless, from 96 to 106 days of age, the BW of the CTR group was greater than PHY. From 21 to 34 days of age, feed conversion of ATB was lower than CTR; however, PHY showed an intermediate result, which did not differ from either ATB or CTR. Challenged animals reduced feed intake from day 35 to 48 compared with unchallenged animals. Piglet performance and fecal score from 21 to 48 days of age were lower in piglets that received ATB compared with the other treatments. However, from 35 to 48 days of age, the FDD of PHY was lower than CTR. Lipid oxidation was not reduced in treated animals. Antimicrobial agent improved the growth performance of piglets until 63 days of age, and no difference was observed between the treatments from 64 to 131 days of age. Antimicrobial agent reduced FDD; the FDD of PHY was similar to that of ATB after 48 days. None of the treatments affected lipid oxidation of pork meat.
id SBZ-1_1e31a63953d3e690f21f70002e852f82
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-35982013000200009
network_acronym_str SBZ-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Phytogenic feed additives in piglets challenged with Salmonella Typhimuriumdiarrheagrowth promoterlipid oxidationperformancephytogenic compoundsswineThe effects of phytogenic feed additives on piglet performance and fecal score (FDD), as well as on lipid oxidation of pork meat were evaluated. One hundred and twenty crossbred weaned piglets were randomly assigned to six treatments according to a 2 × 3 factorial design with five replicates per treatment. Factors were: challenge with Salmonella Typhimurium at 35 days of age or no challenge, and three different additives (control (CTR), basal diet; phytogenic feed additives (PHY), basal diet plus 2000 ppm of phytogenic feed additives - Rosmarinus officinalis, Mentha piperita, Lippia sidoides and Porophyllum ruderale; and antimicrobial agent (ATB), basal diet plus 100 ppm of tylosin, 2000 ppm of zinc and colistin sulfate, 30 ppm in the pre-starter basal diet, 10 ppm in the starter basal diet I and II, and 5 ppm in growth and finishing basal diet). Body weight (BW) of the piglets of ATB was greater throughout the experimental period, without any differences detected between CTR and PHY. Nevertheless, from 96 to 106 days of age, the BW of the CTR group was greater than PHY. From 21 to 34 days of age, feed conversion of ATB was lower than CTR; however, PHY showed an intermediate result, which did not differ from either ATB or CTR. Challenged animals reduced feed intake from day 35 to 48 compared with unchallenged animals. Piglet performance and fecal score from 21 to 48 days of age were lower in piglets that received ATB compared with the other treatments. However, from 35 to 48 days of age, the FDD of PHY was lower than CTR. Lipid oxidation was not reduced in treated animals. Antimicrobial agent improved the growth performance of piglets until 63 days of age, and no difference was observed between the treatments from 64 to 131 days of age. Antimicrobial agent reduced FDD; the FDD of PHY was similar to that of ATB after 48 days. None of the treatments affected lipid oxidation of pork meat.Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia2013-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982013000200009Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.42 n.2 2013reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.1590/S1516-35982013000200009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBruno,Daniel GonçalvesMartins,Simone Maria Massami KitamuraParazzi,Larissa JoséAfonso,Esther RamalhoDel Santo,Tácia AntunesTeixeira,Sergio de Mello NovitaMoreno,Andrea MickeMoretti,Aníbal de Sant'Annaeng2013-02-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-35982013000200009Revistahttps://www.rbz.org.br/pt-br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br1806-92901516-3598opendoar:2013-02-05T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Phytogenic feed additives in piglets challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium
title Phytogenic feed additives in piglets challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium
spellingShingle Phytogenic feed additives in piglets challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium
Bruno,Daniel Gonçalves
diarrhea
growth promoter
lipid oxidation
performance
phytogenic compounds
swine
title_short Phytogenic feed additives in piglets challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium
title_full Phytogenic feed additives in piglets challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium
title_fullStr Phytogenic feed additives in piglets challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium
title_full_unstemmed Phytogenic feed additives in piglets challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium
title_sort Phytogenic feed additives in piglets challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium
author Bruno,Daniel Gonçalves
author_facet Bruno,Daniel Gonçalves
Martins,Simone Maria Massami Kitamura
Parazzi,Larissa José
Afonso,Esther Ramalho
Del Santo,Tácia Antunes
Teixeira,Sergio de Mello Novita
Moreno,Andrea Micke
Moretti,Aníbal de Sant'Anna
author_role author
author2 Martins,Simone Maria Massami Kitamura
Parazzi,Larissa José
Afonso,Esther Ramalho
Del Santo,Tácia Antunes
Teixeira,Sergio de Mello Novita
Moreno,Andrea Micke
Moretti,Aníbal de Sant'Anna
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bruno,Daniel Gonçalves
Martins,Simone Maria Massami Kitamura
Parazzi,Larissa José
Afonso,Esther Ramalho
Del Santo,Tácia Antunes
Teixeira,Sergio de Mello Novita
Moreno,Andrea Micke
Moretti,Aníbal de Sant'Anna
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv diarrhea
growth promoter
lipid oxidation
performance
phytogenic compounds
swine
topic diarrhea
growth promoter
lipid oxidation
performance
phytogenic compounds
swine
description The effects of phytogenic feed additives on piglet performance and fecal score (FDD), as well as on lipid oxidation of pork meat were evaluated. One hundred and twenty crossbred weaned piglets were randomly assigned to six treatments according to a 2 × 3 factorial design with five replicates per treatment. Factors were: challenge with Salmonella Typhimurium at 35 days of age or no challenge, and three different additives (control (CTR), basal diet; phytogenic feed additives (PHY), basal diet plus 2000 ppm of phytogenic feed additives - Rosmarinus officinalis, Mentha piperita, Lippia sidoides and Porophyllum ruderale; and antimicrobial agent (ATB), basal diet plus 100 ppm of tylosin, 2000 ppm of zinc and colistin sulfate, 30 ppm in the pre-starter basal diet, 10 ppm in the starter basal diet I and II, and 5 ppm in growth and finishing basal diet). Body weight (BW) of the piglets of ATB was greater throughout the experimental period, without any differences detected between CTR and PHY. Nevertheless, from 96 to 106 days of age, the BW of the CTR group was greater than PHY. From 21 to 34 days of age, feed conversion of ATB was lower than CTR; however, PHY showed an intermediate result, which did not differ from either ATB or CTR. Challenged animals reduced feed intake from day 35 to 48 compared with unchallenged animals. Piglet performance and fecal score from 21 to 48 days of age were lower in piglets that received ATB compared with the other treatments. However, from 35 to 48 days of age, the FDD of PHY was lower than CTR. Lipid oxidation was not reduced in treated animals. Antimicrobial agent improved the growth performance of piglets until 63 days of age, and no difference was observed between the treatments from 64 to 131 days of age. Antimicrobial agent reduced FDD; the FDD of PHY was similar to that of ATB after 48 days. None of the treatments affected lipid oxidation of pork meat.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982013000200009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982013000200009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-35982013000200009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.42 n.2 2013
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron:SBZ
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron_str SBZ
institution SBZ
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br
_version_ 1750318150500483072