How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Afonso,Esther Ramalho
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Nacimento,Rafael Araujo, Palhares,Julio Cesar Pascale, Gameiro,Augusto Hauber
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982020000100100
Resumo: ABSTRACT The objective with this study was to evaluate the impact of different swine nutritional strategies and technologies, as well as the land spread system, on logistical costs of pig manure distribution. For this, pigs were fed a conventional diet (C0) or a diet supplemented with 0.01% phytase (C1); organic minerals (40% substitution; C2); synthetic amino acids at reduced dietary crude protein levels (C3); or a combination of the three strategies (C4). All pig manure was weighed, then its chemical composition was determined. The mineral values and volume of manure produced were extrapolated to corresponding pig farm sizes in Sao Paulo state (300, 650, and 1000 sows) from real pig manure levels to produce simulations. To determine the logistical cost of manure distribution, two distribution systems were considered: vacuum tank tractor and vacuum tank truck (4.30 and 15 m3, respectively). The land spread truck system had the highest cost/hour worked due to the higher fuel consumption. However, this cost might be different over greater distances. Manure production, as well as the nutrient levels of N, P, and K, were lower for swine fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies. Therefore, the different nutritional technologies reduced the transportation and distribution cost of pig manure by reducing the area and, consequently, the distances that need to be traveled for distribution. However, from an agronomic point of view (i.e., to meet a crop fertilization demand per hectare), manure from pigs fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies had a higher application rate on land.
id SBZ-1_9059271bdd69257b8798142553717cc0
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-35982020000100100
network_acronym_str SBZ-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?enzymeorganic mineralswinewasteABSTRACT The objective with this study was to evaluate the impact of different swine nutritional strategies and technologies, as well as the land spread system, on logistical costs of pig manure distribution. For this, pigs were fed a conventional diet (C0) or a diet supplemented with 0.01% phytase (C1); organic minerals (40% substitution; C2); synthetic amino acids at reduced dietary crude protein levels (C3); or a combination of the three strategies (C4). All pig manure was weighed, then its chemical composition was determined. The mineral values and volume of manure produced were extrapolated to corresponding pig farm sizes in Sao Paulo state (300, 650, and 1000 sows) from real pig manure levels to produce simulations. To determine the logistical cost of manure distribution, two distribution systems were considered: vacuum tank tractor and vacuum tank truck (4.30 and 15 m3, respectively). The land spread truck system had the highest cost/hour worked due to the higher fuel consumption. However, this cost might be different over greater distances. Manure production, as well as the nutrient levels of N, P, and K, were lower for swine fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies. Therefore, the different nutritional technologies reduced the transportation and distribution cost of pig manure by reducing the area and, consequently, the distances that need to be traveled for distribution. However, from an agronomic point of view (i.e., to meet a crop fertilization demand per hectare), manure from pigs fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies had a higher application rate on land.Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982020000100100Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.49 2020reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.37496/rbz4920190045info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAfonso,Esther RamalhoNacimento,Rafael AraujoPalhares,Julio Cesar PascaleGameiro,Augusto Haubereng2020-02-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-35982020000100100Revistahttps://www.rbz.org.br/pt-br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br1806-92901516-3598opendoar:2020-02-19T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?
title How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?
spellingShingle How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?
Afonso,Esther Ramalho
enzyme
organic mineral
swine
waste
title_short How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?
title_full How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?
title_fullStr How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?
title_full_unstemmed How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?
title_sort How can nutritional strategies and feed technologies in pig production affect the logistical costs of manure distribution?
author Afonso,Esther Ramalho
author_facet Afonso,Esther Ramalho
Nacimento,Rafael Araujo
Palhares,Julio Cesar Pascale
Gameiro,Augusto Hauber
author_role author
author2 Nacimento,Rafael Araujo
Palhares,Julio Cesar Pascale
Gameiro,Augusto Hauber
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Afonso,Esther Ramalho
Nacimento,Rafael Araujo
Palhares,Julio Cesar Pascale
Gameiro,Augusto Hauber
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv enzyme
organic mineral
swine
waste
topic enzyme
organic mineral
swine
waste
description ABSTRACT The objective with this study was to evaluate the impact of different swine nutritional strategies and technologies, as well as the land spread system, on logistical costs of pig manure distribution. For this, pigs were fed a conventional diet (C0) or a diet supplemented with 0.01% phytase (C1); organic minerals (40% substitution; C2); synthetic amino acids at reduced dietary crude protein levels (C3); or a combination of the three strategies (C4). All pig manure was weighed, then its chemical composition was determined. The mineral values and volume of manure produced were extrapolated to corresponding pig farm sizes in Sao Paulo state (300, 650, and 1000 sows) from real pig manure levels to produce simulations. To determine the logistical cost of manure distribution, two distribution systems were considered: vacuum tank tractor and vacuum tank truck (4.30 and 15 m3, respectively). The land spread truck system had the highest cost/hour worked due to the higher fuel consumption. However, this cost might be different over greater distances. Manure production, as well as the nutrient levels of N, P, and K, were lower for swine fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies. Therefore, the different nutritional technologies reduced the transportation and distribution cost of pig manure by reducing the area and, consequently, the distances that need to be traveled for distribution. However, from an agronomic point of view (i.e., to meet a crop fertilization demand per hectare), manure from pigs fed diets supplemented with nutritional technologies had a higher application rate on land.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982020000100100
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982020000100100
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.37496/rbz4920190045
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.49 2020
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron:SBZ
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron_str SBZ
institution SBZ
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br
_version_ 1750318153624190976