THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Corrêa, Camila Bottero
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Lockmann, Kamila
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4148
Resumo: This article is part of a broader study that analyzed the discourses of school inclusion in official documents and how they enact strategies of governmentality on the so-called normal subjects. Therefore, it was key to question the concept of normality. This text aims to present how the notion of normality was historically produced and, together with it, the practices of in/exclusion focusing on the subjects considered normal. We take as theoretical support the studies conducted by Michel Foucault, Lilia Lobo, and Georges Canguilhem, who questioned the notions of abnormality and norm. As a result, we built three historical meanings to the notion of normality related to the knowledge produced throughout a certain period: the transcendental normality– in the Middle Ages established by religious and/or divine knowledge, connected to the subjects’ bodies and conducts; the scientific normality – founded by scientific knowledge, between the 16th and 18th centuries, which seems linked to the subjects’ behaviors and, by the end of the 18th century, also connected to their intimacy; and the differential normalities- associated to a science of State, to statistical knowledge, and a flexible norm, which operates in the security society. This notion is established through two contemporary movements related to the same phenomenon: the naturalization of differences.
id SCI-1_08c5544cac269d25841e5e29e75ec966
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4148
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGSLA PRODUCCIÓN DE LA NOCIÓN DE NORMALIDAD Y SUS SENTIDOS HISTÓRICOSA PRODUÇÃO DA NOÇÃO DE NORMALIDADE E SEUS SENTIDOS HISTÓRICOSnormalidadenormainclusãonormalitynorminclusionnormalidadenormainclusiónThis article is part of a broader study that analyzed the discourses of school inclusion in official documents and how they enact strategies of governmentality on the so-called normal subjects. Therefore, it was key to question the concept of normality. This text aims to present how the notion of normality was historically produced and, together with it, the practices of in/exclusion focusing on the subjects considered normal. We take as theoretical support the studies conducted by Michel Foucault, Lilia Lobo, and Georges Canguilhem, who questioned the notions of abnormality and norm. As a result, we built three historical meanings to the notion of normality related to the knowledge produced throughout a certain period: the transcendental normality– in the Middle Ages established by religious and/or divine knowledge, connected to the subjects’ bodies and conducts; the scientific normality – founded by scientific knowledge, between the 16th and 18th centuries, which seems linked to the subjects’ behaviors and, by the end of the 18th century, also connected to their intimacy; and the differential normalities- associated to a science of State, to statistical knowledge, and a flexible norm, which operates in the security society. This notion is established through two contemporary movements related to the same phenomenon: the naturalization of differences.Este artículo es el recorte de una investigación más amplia que analizó discursos sobre la inclusión escolar, en documentos oficiales, y el modo como operan estrategias de gobernanza sobre los sujetos llamados normales. Para ello, tensionar el concepto de normalidad fue fundamental para la investigación. El presente texto tiene como objetivo presentar cómo se ha ido produciendo históricamente la noción de normalidad y junto a ella prácticas de in/exclusión con énfasis en el sujeto llamado normal. Tomamos como soporte teórico los estudios realizados por Michel Foucault, Lilia Lobo y Georges Canguilhem, autores que en sus investigaciones tensionaron las nociones de anormalidad y norma. Como resultados, construimos tres significados históricos para la noción de normalidad que se encuentran relacionados con los saberes producidos a lo largo de cada época: la normalidad trascendental -evidenciada en la Edad Media y constituida por saberes religiosos y/o divinos, estando vinculada al cuerpo y a la conducta de los sujetos; la normalidad científica – constituida por el conocimiento científico, entre los siglos XVI y XVIII, aparece vinculada al comportamiento de los sujetos y, a fines del siglo XVIII, también se muestra relacionada con su intimidad; y normalidades diferenciales – asociada a una ciencia del Estado, a los saberes estadísticos y a una norma flexible, que entra en operación en la sociedad de seguridad. Esta noción se constituye a partir de dos movimientos contemporáneos relacionados con un mismo fenómeno: la naturalización de las diferencias.Este artigo é recorte de uma pesquisa mais ampla que analisou discursos da inclusão escolar, em documentos oficiais, e o modo como operam estratégias de governamento sobre os sujeitos ditos normais. Para isso, tensionar o conceito de normalidade foi fundamental para a pesquisa. O presente texto tem assim por objetivo apresentar como a noção de normalidade foi sendo produzida historicamente e junto a ela práticas de in/exclusão com ênfase no sujeito dito normal. Tomamos como suporte teórico os estudos realizados por Michel Foucault, Lilia Lobo e Georges Canguilhem, autores que em suas investigações tensionaram as noções de anormalidade e norma. Como resultados construímos três sentidos históricos para a noção de normalidade que se encontram relacionados com os saberes produzidos ao longo de cada época: a normalidade transcendental – evidenciada na Idade Média e constituída pelos saberes religiosos e/ou divinos, estando vinculada ao corpo e a conduta dos sujeitos; a normalidade científica – constituída pelos saberes científicos, entre os séculos XVI e XVIII, aparece vinculada ao comportamento dos sujeitos e no fim do século XVIII, também, se mostra relacionada a sua intimidade; e as normalidades diferenciais – associada a uma ciência de Estado, aos saberes estatísticos e a uma norma flexível, que entra em operação na sociedade de seguridade. Essa noção se constitui a partir de dois movimentos contemporâneos relacionados a um mesmo fenômeno: o da naturalização das diferenças.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2022-05-20info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/414810.1590/SciELOPreprints.4148porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4148/7855Copyright (c) 2022 Camila Bottero Corrêa, Kamila Lockmannhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCorrêa, Camila BotteroLockmann, Kamilareponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2022-05-19T12:09:09Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4148Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2022-05-19T12:09:09SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS
LA PRODUCCIÓN DE LA NOCIÓN DE NORMALIDAD Y SUS SENTIDOS HISTÓRICOS
A PRODUÇÃO DA NOÇÃO DE NORMALIDADE E SEUS SENTIDOS HISTÓRICOS
title THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS
spellingShingle THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS
Corrêa, Camila Bottero
normalidade
norma
inclusão
normality
norm
inclusion
normalidade
norma
inclusión
title_short THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS
title_full THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS
title_fullStr THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS
title_full_unstemmed THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS
title_sort THE CREATION OF THE NOTION OF NORMALITY AND ITS HISTORICAL MEANINGS
author Corrêa, Camila Bottero
author_facet Corrêa, Camila Bottero
Lockmann, Kamila
author_role author
author2 Lockmann, Kamila
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Corrêa, Camila Bottero
Lockmann, Kamila
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv normalidade
norma
inclusão
normality
norm
inclusion
normalidade
norma
inclusión
topic normalidade
norma
inclusão
normality
norm
inclusion
normalidade
norma
inclusión
description This article is part of a broader study that analyzed the discourses of school inclusion in official documents and how they enact strategies of governmentality on the so-called normal subjects. Therefore, it was key to question the concept of normality. This text aims to present how the notion of normality was historically produced and, together with it, the practices of in/exclusion focusing on the subjects considered normal. We take as theoretical support the studies conducted by Michel Foucault, Lilia Lobo, and Georges Canguilhem, who questioned the notions of abnormality and norm. As a result, we built three historical meanings to the notion of normality related to the knowledge produced throughout a certain period: the transcendental normality– in the Middle Ages established by religious and/or divine knowledge, connected to the subjects’ bodies and conducts; the scientific normality – founded by scientific knowledge, between the 16th and 18th centuries, which seems linked to the subjects’ behaviors and, by the end of the 18th century, also connected to their intimacy; and the differential normalities- associated to a science of State, to statistical knowledge, and a flexible norm, which operates in the security society. This notion is established through two contemporary movements related to the same phenomenon: the naturalization of differences.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4148
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4148
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4148
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4148
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4148/7855
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Camila Bottero Corrêa, Kamila Lockmann
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Camila Bottero Corrêa, Kamila Lockmann
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047828536623104