Why extended visits in an adult ICU receive a more positive evaluation from patient relatives than from the health care team?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Severigni, Claudia Eugênio
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Souza, Emiliane Nogueira de
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1106
Resumo: Intensive care units (ICUs) have adopted flexible visitation models as a way to favor care focused on the needs of patients and their families. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an extended visitation model in an adult ICU from the perspective of family members and the health care team. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. This study was carried out with relatives of patients and with the health care team in a general ICU with an extended visitation model, in a hospital in the south of Brazil. The evaluation of the extended visitation policy was carried out using a 22-question survey. RESULTS: The answers of 95 accompanying family members and 95 members of the ICU care team were analyzed. Members of the nursing staff evaluated the changes in attitudes at work as negative (77.9%) , believe that the work gests interrupted (46.3%), and consider that it contributes little to decreasing anxiety and stress in the family. The accompanying family members evaluated the following elements more positively: decreased anxiety and stress in the family (91.6% versus 58.9%;p <0.01); family members get more information (86.3% versus 64.2%; p <0.01). CONCLUSION: Both groups evaluated as positive the majority of the aspects of the extended visitation model. However, the aspects that presented the greatest divergence in the evaluations, with a more negative perception from ICU health care team members, were the interference in their work, changes in attitudes at work, a lower perception of the reduction in anxiety and stress in the family and patients, and discomfort caused by the presence of a relative.
id SCI-1_64791ad8eaf67d7d2a7b54f654d43afb
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1106
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling Why extended visits in an adult ICU receive a more positive evaluation from patient relatives than from the health care team?NursingIntensive care unitpatient-centered carevisitors to patientsIntensive care units (ICUs) have adopted flexible visitation models as a way to favor care focused on the needs of patients and their families. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an extended visitation model in an adult ICU from the perspective of family members and the health care team. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. This study was carried out with relatives of patients and with the health care team in a general ICU with an extended visitation model, in a hospital in the south of Brazil. The evaluation of the extended visitation policy was carried out using a 22-question survey. RESULTS: The answers of 95 accompanying family members and 95 members of the ICU care team were analyzed. Members of the nursing staff evaluated the changes in attitudes at work as negative (77.9%) , believe that the work gests interrupted (46.3%), and consider that it contributes little to decreasing anxiety and stress in the family. The accompanying family members evaluated the following elements more positively: decreased anxiety and stress in the family (91.6% versus 58.9%;p <0.01); family members get more information (86.3% versus 64.2%; p <0.01). CONCLUSION: Both groups evaluated as positive the majority of the aspects of the extended visitation model. However, the aspects that presented the greatest divergence in the evaluations, with a more negative perception from ICU health care team members, were the interference in their work, changes in attitudes at work, a lower perception of the reduction in anxiety and stress in the family and patients, and discomfort caused by the presence of a relative.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2020-09-03info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/110610.1590/SciELOPreprints.1106enghttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1106/1781Copyright (c) 2020 Emiliane Nogueira de Souza, Claudia Eugênio Severignihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSeverigni, Claudia EugênioSouza, Emiliane Nogueira dereponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2020-08-17T13:31:04Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1106Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2020-08-17T13:31:04SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Why extended visits in an adult ICU receive a more positive evaluation from patient relatives than from the health care team?
title Why extended visits in an adult ICU receive a more positive evaluation from patient relatives than from the health care team?
spellingShingle Why extended visits in an adult ICU receive a more positive evaluation from patient relatives than from the health care team?
Severigni, Claudia Eugênio
Nursing
Intensive care unit
patient-centered care
visitors to patients
title_short Why extended visits in an adult ICU receive a more positive evaluation from patient relatives than from the health care team?
title_full Why extended visits in an adult ICU receive a more positive evaluation from patient relatives than from the health care team?
title_fullStr Why extended visits in an adult ICU receive a more positive evaluation from patient relatives than from the health care team?
title_full_unstemmed Why extended visits in an adult ICU receive a more positive evaluation from patient relatives than from the health care team?
title_sort Why extended visits in an adult ICU receive a more positive evaluation from patient relatives than from the health care team?
author Severigni, Claudia Eugênio
author_facet Severigni, Claudia Eugênio
Souza, Emiliane Nogueira de
author_role author
author2 Souza, Emiliane Nogueira de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Severigni, Claudia Eugênio
Souza, Emiliane Nogueira de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Nursing
Intensive care unit
patient-centered care
visitors to patients
topic Nursing
Intensive care unit
patient-centered care
visitors to patients
description Intensive care units (ICUs) have adopted flexible visitation models as a way to favor care focused on the needs of patients and their families. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an extended visitation model in an adult ICU from the perspective of family members and the health care team. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. This study was carried out with relatives of patients and with the health care team in a general ICU with an extended visitation model, in a hospital in the south of Brazil. The evaluation of the extended visitation policy was carried out using a 22-question survey. RESULTS: The answers of 95 accompanying family members and 95 members of the ICU care team were analyzed. Members of the nursing staff evaluated the changes in attitudes at work as negative (77.9%) , believe that the work gests interrupted (46.3%), and consider that it contributes little to decreasing anxiety and stress in the family. The accompanying family members evaluated the following elements more positively: decreased anxiety and stress in the family (91.6% versus 58.9%;p <0.01); family members get more information (86.3% versus 64.2%; p <0.01). CONCLUSION: Both groups evaluated as positive the majority of the aspects of the extended visitation model. However, the aspects that presented the greatest divergence in the evaluations, with a more negative perception from ICU health care team members, were the interference in their work, changes in attitudes at work, a lower perception of the reduction in anxiety and stress in the family and patients, and discomfort caused by the presence of a relative.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1106
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.1106
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1106
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.1106
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1106/1781
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Emiliane Nogueira de Souza, Claudia Eugênio Severigni
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Emiliane Nogueira de Souza, Claudia Eugênio Severigni
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047819929911296