Profile and scientific production of Brazilian National Council of Technological and Scientific Development researchers in Pediatrics

• Autor(a) principal: Oliveira,Maria Christina L.
• Data de Publicação: 2013
• Outros Autores: Martelli,Daniella Reis B., Pinheiro,Sergio Veloso, Miranda,Debora Marques, Quirino,Isabel Gomes, Leite,Barbara Gusmão L., Colosimo,Enrico Antonio, Silva,Ana Cristina S. e, Martelli-Júnior,Hercílio, Oliveira,Eduardo Araujo
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Revista Paulista de Pediatria (Ed. Português. Online)
• Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-05822013000300278
• topic: scientific publication indicators; Pediatrics; Medicine; education, Medical, Graduate; Health Sciences

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the profile and the scientific production of researchers in Pediatrics with scholarship from the National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development. METHODS: The Lattes curricula of 34 researchers in Pediatrics with active scholarships, from 2006 to 2008 were included in the analysis. The variables of interest were: gender, affiliation, time since PHD, tutoring of undergraduate students, mentorship of masters and doctors, scientific production and the papers' impact. RESULTS: In a total of 411 researchers in Medicine, 34 (8%) belonged to Pediatrics. Males (77%) and scholars in the category 2 of productivity (62%) prevailed. Three states of Brazil were responsible for approximately 90% of the researchers: São Paulo (53%), Minas Gerais (21%), and Rio Grande do Sul (15%). During their academic career, the Pediatrics researchers have published 3,122 articles with a median of 89 articles per researcher (interquartile range - IQ=51-119). Of the total, 40 and 59% articles were indexed in the Web of Science and Scopus databases, respectively. The Pediatrics researchers have published papers in 599 journals with a median impact factor of 2.35 (IQ=1.37-3.73) for the 323 indexed journals. CONCLUSIONS: The Pediatrics researchers have a relevant scientific output from the quantity point of the view, but there is a need to improve quality.