Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Okuno, Nilo Massaru, Perandini, Luiz Augusto Buoro, Oliveira, Fernando Roberto de, Buchheit, Martin, Simões, Herbert Gustavo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UCB
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/148
https://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/handle/123456789/7368
Resumo: Objective. – The aim of this study was to provide concurrent validity evidences to perceived exertion threshold (PET) by comparing and establishing relationships with aerobic fitness parameters derived from square-wave and incremental tests. Methods. – Eleven male college students performed one incremental test to determine first and second ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2, respectively), maximal oxygen uptake ( VO2max ), and maximal aerobic power (MAP); four predictive trials for the critical power (CP) and PET estimations. Results. – Oxygen consumption ( VO2) at VT1 and VT2 were 22.9±4.2 and 35.8±4.7 ml/kg per minute, respectively. The MAP and VO2max were 267±34W and 40.3±6.3 ml/kg per minute, respectively. The PET (146±31 W) and CP (146±33 W) did not differ from each other, and both estimates were between VT1 (121±28 W) and VT2 (228±36 W). The correlations between PET and CP, expressed in relative terms to body mass, were significant (P<0.01, r = 0.84). The correlations between PET and relative VO2 at VT1 (r = 0.76), VT2 (r = 0.72) and VO2max (r = 0.73) were significant (P<0.05). Conclusion. – PET did not significantly differ from CP, and presented significant correlations with VT1, VT2 and VO2max derived from incremental test. Thus, it can be considered as a valid measure of aerobic capacity. © 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
id UCB-2_bbf24ef72122a1d42a7233f37fa7a81a
oai_identifier_str oai:200.214.135.189:123456789/7368
network_acronym_str UCB-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UCB
spelling Nakamura, Fábio YuzoOkuno, Nilo MassaruPerandini, Luiz Augusto BuoroOliveira, Fernando Roberto deBuchheit, MartinSimões, Herbert Gustavo2016-10-10T03:51:15Z2016-10-10T03:51:15Z2009NAKAMURA, Fábio Yuzo. et al. Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power. Science & Sports, v. 24, p. 196-201, 2009.http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/148https://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/handle/123456789/7368Objective. – The aim of this study was to provide concurrent validity evidences to perceived exertion threshold (PET) by comparing and establishing relationships with aerobic fitness parameters derived from square-wave and incremental tests. Methods. – Eleven male college students performed one incremental test to determine first and second ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2, respectively), maximal oxygen uptake ( VO2max ), and maximal aerobic power (MAP); four predictive trials for the critical power (CP) and PET estimations. Results. – Oxygen consumption ( VO2) at VT1 and VT2 were 22.9±4.2 and 35.8±4.7 ml/kg per minute, respectively. The MAP and VO2max were 267±34W and 40.3±6.3 ml/kg per minute, respectively. The PET (146±31 W) and CP (146±33 W) did not differ from each other, and both estimates were between VT1 (121±28 W) and VT2 (228±36 W). The correlations between PET and CP, expressed in relative terms to body mass, were significant (P<0.01, r = 0.84). The correlations between PET and relative VO2 at VT1 (r = 0.76), VT2 (r = 0.72) and VO2max (r = 0.73) were significant (P<0.05). Conclusion. – PET did not significantly differ from CP, and presented significant correlations with VT1, VT2 and VO2max derived from incremental test. Thus, it can be considered as a valid measure of aerobic capacity. © 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.Objectifs. – Le but de cette étude était de démontrer la validité du seuil de pénibilité perc¸ue à l’effort (PET) à partir de relations avec des repères physiologiques caractérisant la capacité aérobie, obtenus lors de tests incrémentés et à intensité constante. Méthodes. – Onze étudiants masculins ont effectué 1) un test incrémenté pour déterminer le premier (VT1) et second (VT2) seuil ventilatoire, la consommation maximale d’oxygène ( VO2max ) et la puissance maximale aérobie (MAP) ; 2) quatre exercices rectangulaires pour l’estimation de la puissance critique (CP) et de PET. Résultats. – La consommation d’oxygène (VO2) à VT1 et VT2 était 22,9±4,2 et 35,8±4,7 ml/kg par minute, respectivement. La MAP et VO2max moyenne était 267±34W et 40,3±6,3 ml/kg par minute, respectivement. PET (146±31 W) et CP (146±33 W) n’étaient pas significativement différents, et étaient tout deux entre VT1 (121±28 W) et VT2 (228±36 W). La corrélation entre PET et CP, exprimés de manière relative au poids de corps, était significative (p<0,01, r = 0,84). Les corrélations entre PET et la VO2 relative à VT1 (r = 0,76), VT2 (r = 0,72) et VO2max (r = 0,73) étaient significatives (p<0,05). Conclusion. – PET n’était pas significativement différent de CP et présentait des corrélations significatives avec VT1, VT2 et VO2max obtenues lors du test incrémental. Cela suggère la validité de PET comme une mesure indirecte des capacités aérobies. © 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.Made available in DSpace on 2016-10-10T03:51:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 5 Perceived exertion threshold_comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power.pdf: 297274 bytes, checksum: 29d81da39f3f03a866e800205f577a70 (MD5) license_url: 52 bytes, checksum: 3d480ae6c91e310daba2020f8787d6f9 (MD5) license_text: 21716 bytes, checksum: c200d7a52028dd255d79d7c917cc149a (MD5) license_rdf: 23005 bytes, checksum: 845fd6e03839c7264c0c164178b2e173 (MD5) license.txt: 1818 bytes, checksum: 46de3043f08e87659ae535ef74b8ce9d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009SimPublicadoTextoAerobic capacityMaximal oxygen uptakeValidityPerceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical powerSeuil de pénibilité perçue à l’effort: comparaison avec les seuils ventilatoires et la puissance critiqueinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleScience & Sportsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UCBinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBORIGINALPerceived exertion threshold_comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power.pdfapplication/pdf297274https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/1/Perceived%20exertion%20threshold_comparison%20with%20ventilatory%20thresholds%20and%20critical%20power.pdf29d81da39f3f03a866e800205f577a70MD51CC-LICENSElicense_urlapplication/octet-stream52https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/2/license_url3d480ae6c91e310daba2020f8787d6f9MD52license_textapplication/octet-stream21716https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/3/license_textc200d7a52028dd255d79d7c917cc149aMD53license_rdfapplication/octet-stream23005https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/4/license_rdf845fd6e03839c7264c0c164178b2e173MD54LICENSElicense.txttext/plain1818https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/5/license.txt46de3043f08e87659ae535ef74b8ce9dMD55TEXTPerceived exertion threshold_comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power.pdf.txtPerceived exertion threshold_comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain28601https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/6/Perceived%20exertion%20threshold_comparison%20with%20ventilatory%20thresholds%20and%20critical%20power.pdf.txtd0fe50267a69a73ed9b576c5afceae13MD56123456789/73682017-01-17 15:09:29.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ório de Publicaçõeshttps://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power
dc.title.alternative.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Seuil de pénibilité perçue à l’effort: comparaison avec les seuils ventilatoires et la puissance critique
title Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power
spellingShingle Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power
Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo
Aerobic capacity
Maximal oxygen uptake
Validity
title_short Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power
title_full Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power
title_fullStr Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power
title_full_unstemmed Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power
title_sort Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power
author Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo
author_facet Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo
Okuno, Nilo Massaru
Perandini, Luiz Augusto Buoro
Oliveira, Fernando Roberto de
Buchheit, Martin
Simões, Herbert Gustavo
author_role author
author2 Okuno, Nilo Massaru
Perandini, Luiz Augusto Buoro
Oliveira, Fernando Roberto de
Buchheit, Martin
Simões, Herbert Gustavo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nakamura, Fábio Yuzo
Okuno, Nilo Massaru
Perandini, Luiz Augusto Buoro
Oliveira, Fernando Roberto de
Buchheit, Martin
Simões, Herbert Gustavo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aerobic capacity
Maximal oxygen uptake
Validity
topic Aerobic capacity
Maximal oxygen uptake
Validity
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv Objective. – The aim of this study was to provide concurrent validity evidences to perceived exertion threshold (PET) by comparing and establishing relationships with aerobic fitness parameters derived from square-wave and incremental tests. Methods. – Eleven male college students performed one incremental test to determine first and second ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2, respectively), maximal oxygen uptake ( VO2max ), and maximal aerobic power (MAP); four predictive trials for the critical power (CP) and PET estimations. Results. – Oxygen consumption ( VO2) at VT1 and VT2 were 22.9±4.2 and 35.8±4.7 ml/kg per minute, respectively. The MAP and VO2max were 267±34W and 40.3±6.3 ml/kg per minute, respectively. The PET (146±31 W) and CP (146±33 W) did not differ from each other, and both estimates were between VT1 (121±28 W) and VT2 (228±36 W). The correlations between PET and CP, expressed in relative terms to body mass, were significant (P<0.01, r = 0.84). The correlations between PET and relative VO2 at VT1 (r = 0.76), VT2 (r = 0.72) and VO2max (r = 0.73) were significant (P<0.05). Conclusion. – PET did not significantly differ from CP, and presented significant correlations with VT1, VT2 and VO2max derived from incremental test. Thus, it can be considered as a valid measure of aerobic capacity. © 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Objectifs. – Le but de cette étude était de démontrer la validité du seuil de pénibilité perc¸ue à l’effort (PET) à partir de relations avec des repères physiologiques caractérisant la capacité aérobie, obtenus lors de tests incrémentés et à intensité constante. Méthodes. – Onze étudiants masculins ont effectué 1) un test incrémenté pour déterminer le premier (VT1) et second (VT2) seuil ventilatoire, la consommation maximale d’oxygène ( VO2max ) et la puissance maximale aérobie (MAP) ; 2) quatre exercices rectangulaires pour l’estimation de la puissance critique (CP) et de PET. Résultats. – La consommation d’oxygène (VO2) à VT1 et VT2 était 22,9±4,2 et 35,8±4,7 ml/kg par minute, respectivement. La MAP et VO2max moyenne était 267±34W et 40,3±6,3 ml/kg par minute, respectivement. PET (146±31 W) et CP (146±33 W) n’étaient pas significativement différents, et étaient tout deux entre VT1 (121±28 W) et VT2 (228±36 W). La corrélation entre PET et CP, exprimés de manière relative au poids de corps, était significative (p<0,01, r = 0,84). Les corrélations entre PET et la VO2 relative à VT1 (r = 0,76), VT2 (r = 0,72) et VO2max (r = 0,73) étaient significatives (p<0,05). Conclusion. – PET n’était pas significativement différent de CP et présentait des corrélations significatives avec VT1, VT2 et VO2max obtenues lors du test incrémental. Cela suggère la validité de PET comme une mesure indirecte des capacités aérobies. © 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
dc.description.version.pt_BR.fl_txt_mv Sim
dc.description.status.pt_BR.fl_txt_mv Publicado
description Objective. – The aim of this study was to provide concurrent validity evidences to perceived exertion threshold (PET) by comparing and establishing relationships with aerobic fitness parameters derived from square-wave and incremental tests. Methods. – Eleven male college students performed one incremental test to determine first and second ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2, respectively), maximal oxygen uptake ( VO2max ), and maximal aerobic power (MAP); four predictive trials for the critical power (CP) and PET estimations. Results. – Oxygen consumption ( VO2) at VT1 and VT2 were 22.9±4.2 and 35.8±4.7 ml/kg per minute, respectively. The MAP and VO2max were 267±34W and 40.3±6.3 ml/kg per minute, respectively. The PET (146±31 W) and CP (146±33 W) did not differ from each other, and both estimates were between VT1 (121±28 W) and VT2 (228±36 W). The correlations between PET and CP, expressed in relative terms to body mass, were significant (P<0.01, r = 0.84). The correlations between PET and relative VO2 at VT1 (r = 0.76), VT2 (r = 0.72) and VO2max (r = 0.73) were significant (P<0.05). Conclusion. – PET did not significantly differ from CP, and presented significant correlations with VT1, VT2 and VO2max derived from incremental test. Thus, it can be considered as a valid measure of aerobic capacity. © 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2009
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-10-10T03:51:15Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2016-10-10T03:51:15Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
status_str publishedVersion
format article
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv NAKAMURA, Fábio Yuzo. et al. Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power. Science & Sports, v. 24, p. 196-201, 2009.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/148
https://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/handle/123456789/7368
identifier_str_mv NAKAMURA, Fábio Yuzo. et al. Perceived exertion threshold: Comparison with ventilatory thresholds and critical power. Science & Sports, v. 24, p. 196-201, 2009.
url http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/148
https://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/handle/123456789/7368
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv Texto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UCB
instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron:UCB
instname_str Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron_str UCB
institution UCB
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UCB
collection Repositório Institucional da UCB
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/1/Perceived%20exertion%20threshold_comparison%20with%20ventilatory%20thresholds%20and%20critical%20power.pdf
https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/2/license_url
https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/3/license_text
https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/4/license_rdf
https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/5/license.txt
https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/123456789/7368/6/Perceived%20exertion%20threshold_comparison%20with%20ventilatory%20thresholds%20and%20critical%20power.pdf.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 29d81da39f3f03a866e800205f577a70
3d480ae6c91e310daba2020f8787d6f9
c200d7a52028dd255d79d7c917cc149a
845fd6e03839c7264c0c164178b2e173
46de3043f08e87659ae535ef74b8ce9d
d0fe50267a69a73ed9b576c5afceae13
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1724829826950365184