Evaluating microcredit and solidarity economy programs at Banco do Nordeste

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gussi, Alcides Fernando
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Thé, Raul da Fonseca Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Conhecer (Fortaleza)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/revistaconhecer/article/view/2071
Resumo: Two distinct experiences in the field of microfinance promoted by Banco do Nordeste do Brasil are evaluated here: (1) Crediamigo Program, oriented productive urban microcredit; and (2) Support Program for Solidary Productive Projects (PAPPS), under the assumptions of the solidarity economy. Therefore, the ethnographic approach is presented as an important methodology in the development of evaluation processes. It is pointed to the reach of subjects, relatively, in the same social group, but who present themselves as different audiences and receive attention, impacts and disparate investments on their lives and trajectories, according to the programs in which they are inserted. The results map how these two policies dialogue while differing and distancing themselves in focus and weight given the economic, social and political dimensions in the Brazilian Northeast. By way of conclusion, the logic followed by the programs is evident; the impacts on the lives of those reached; and what qualities, limits and possibilities of these programs.
id UECE-2_0f2eeb8acba1863162ea55bef96a88ea
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.uece.br:article/2071
network_acronym_str UECE-2
network_name_str Conhecer (Fortaleza)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluating microcredit and solidarity economy programs at Banco do NordesteAvaliando programas de microcrédito e economia solidária do Banco do Nordestepolíticas públicasmicrocréditoeconomia solidáriabanco de desenvolvimentopublic policymicrocreditsolidarity economydevelopment bankTwo distinct experiences in the field of microfinance promoted by Banco do Nordeste do Brasil are evaluated here: (1) Crediamigo Program, oriented productive urban microcredit; and (2) Support Program for Solidary Productive Projects (PAPPS), under the assumptions of the solidarity economy. Therefore, the ethnographic approach is presented as an important methodology in the development of evaluation processes. It is pointed to the reach of subjects, relatively, in the same social group, but who present themselves as different audiences and receive attention, impacts and disparate investments on their lives and trajectories, according to the programs in which they are inserted. The results map how these two policies dialogue while differing and distancing themselves in focus and weight given the economic, social and political dimensions in the Brazilian Northeast. By way of conclusion, the logic followed by the programs is evident; the impacts on the lives of those reached; and what qualities, limits and possibilities of these programs.Duas experiências distintas no campo das microfinanças promovidas pelo Banco do Nordeste do Brasil são aqui avaliadas: (1) Programa Crediamigo, de microcrédito urbano produtivo orientado; e (2) Programa de Apoio a Projetos Produtivos Solidários (PAPPS), nos pressupostos da economia solidária. Para tanto, o enfoque etnográfico é apresentado como importante metodologia no desenvolvimento de processos avaliativos. Aponta-se para o alcance de sujeitos, relativamente, no mesmo grupo social, porém que se apresentam como públicos diferentes e recebem atenções, impactos e investimentos dispares sobre suas vidas e trajetórias, de acordo com os programas em que se inserem. Os resultados mapeiam como essas duas políticas, dialogam ao mesmo tempo em que diferem e se distanciam em foco e peso dados às dimensões econômicas, sociais e políticas no Nordeste brasileiro. À guisa de conclusão, evidencia-se a lógica seguida pelos programas; os impactos proporcionados na vida dos alcançados; e que qualidades, limites e possibilidades desses programas.EdUECE2020-01-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.uece.br/index.php/revistaconhecer/article/view/207110.32335/2238-0426.2020.10.24.2071Conhecer: debate entre o público e o privado; v. 10 n. 24 (2020); 164-1782238-0426reponame:Conhecer (Fortaleza)instname:Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE)instacron:UECEporenghttps://revistas.uece.br/index.php/revistaconhecer/article/view/2071/2419https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/revistaconhecer/article/view/2071/2541Copyright (c) 2020 Conhecer: debate entre o público e o privadoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGussi, Alcides FernandoThé, Raul da Fonseca Silva2020-08-06T12:21:24Zoai:ojs.revistas.uece.br:article/2071Revistahttps://revistas.uece.br/index.php/revistaconhecer/indexPUBhttps://revistas.uece.br/index.php/revistaconhecer/oaifhsfgm@gmail.com||revistaconhecer@uece.br2238-04262238-0426opendoar:2020-08-06T12:21:24Conhecer (Fortaleza) - Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluating microcredit and solidarity economy programs at Banco do Nordeste
Avaliando programas de microcrédito e economia solidária do Banco do Nordeste
title Evaluating microcredit and solidarity economy programs at Banco do Nordeste
spellingShingle Evaluating microcredit and solidarity economy programs at Banco do Nordeste
Gussi, Alcides Fernando
políticas públicas
microcrédito
economia solidária
banco de desenvolvimento
public policy
microcredit
solidarity economy
development bank
title_short Evaluating microcredit and solidarity economy programs at Banco do Nordeste
title_full Evaluating microcredit and solidarity economy programs at Banco do Nordeste
title_fullStr Evaluating microcredit and solidarity economy programs at Banco do Nordeste
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating microcredit and solidarity economy programs at Banco do Nordeste
title_sort Evaluating microcredit and solidarity economy programs at Banco do Nordeste
author Gussi, Alcides Fernando
author_facet Gussi, Alcides Fernando
Thé, Raul da Fonseca Silva
author_role author
author2 Thé, Raul da Fonseca Silva
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gussi, Alcides Fernando
Thé, Raul da Fonseca Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv políticas públicas
microcrédito
economia solidária
banco de desenvolvimento
public policy
microcredit
solidarity economy
development bank
topic políticas públicas
microcrédito
economia solidária
banco de desenvolvimento
public policy
microcredit
solidarity economy
development bank
description Two distinct experiences in the field of microfinance promoted by Banco do Nordeste do Brasil are evaluated here: (1) Crediamigo Program, oriented productive urban microcredit; and (2) Support Program for Solidary Productive Projects (PAPPS), under the assumptions of the solidarity economy. Therefore, the ethnographic approach is presented as an important methodology in the development of evaluation processes. It is pointed to the reach of subjects, relatively, in the same social group, but who present themselves as different audiences and receive attention, impacts and disparate investments on their lives and trajectories, according to the programs in which they are inserted. The results map how these two policies dialogue while differing and distancing themselves in focus and weight given the economic, social and political dimensions in the Brazilian Northeast. By way of conclusion, the logic followed by the programs is evident; the impacts on the lives of those reached; and what qualities, limits and possibilities of these programs.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/revistaconhecer/article/view/2071
10.32335/2238-0426.2020.10.24.2071
url https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/revistaconhecer/article/view/2071
identifier_str_mv 10.32335/2238-0426.2020.10.24.2071
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/revistaconhecer/article/view/2071/2419
https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/revistaconhecer/article/view/2071/2541
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Conhecer: debate entre o público e o privado
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Conhecer: debate entre o público e o privado
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EdUECE
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EdUECE
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Conhecer: debate entre o público e o privado; v. 10 n. 24 (2020); 164-178
2238-0426
reponame:Conhecer (Fortaleza)
instname:Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE)
instacron:UECE
instname_str Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE)
instacron_str UECE
institution UECE
reponame_str Conhecer (Fortaleza)
collection Conhecer (Fortaleza)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Conhecer (Fortaleza) - Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fhsfgm@gmail.com||revistaconhecer@uece.br
_version_ 1797219788885327872