Collaborative study to evaluate the indigestible neutral detergent fiber and indigestible acid detergent fiber contents in feeds by in situ procedure

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Marjorrie Augusto de
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Detmann, Edenio, Rocha, Gabriel Cipriano, Franco, Marcia de Oliveira, Batista, Erick Darlisson, Valadares Filho, Sebastião de Campos, Berchielli, Telma Teresinha
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/23546
Resumo: The objective of this collaborative study was to evaluate the indigestible neutral detergent fiber (iNDF) and indigestible acid detergent fiber (iADF) content in feeds in six laboratories from institutions linked to the National Institute of Science and Technology in Animal Science (INCT-CA). Six feeds were evaluated: signal grass hay, sugarcane, corn silage, soybean meal, corn and citrus pulp. Estimated levels of iNDF and iADF proved to be dependent on the laboratory in which the analysis was performed. It was found that differences between laboratories ranged from 2.40 percentage points for soybean meal to 8.05 percentage points for sugarcane for iNDF analysis and from 1.79 percentage points for corn to 10.06 percentage points for hay for iADF analysis. It was observed that the individual evaluation of each material, the total random variation of the results between laboratories ranged from 88.75 to 96.77% and 88.75 to 98.40% for iNDF and iADF analysis, respectively. The iNDF and iADF levels are dependent on the interaction effect between the evaluated material and laboratory and have low reproducibility; this may be a consequence of the differences between the methods practiced by each laboratory, demonstrating lack of standardization of procedures used by the laboratories.
id UEL-11_1ea96f0c66f712fb2106f26dbd9f4a34
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23546
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Collaborative study to evaluate the indigestible neutral detergent fiber and indigestible acid detergent fiber contents in feeds by in situ procedureEstudo colaborativo para avaliação dos teores de fibra em detergente neutro indigestível e fibra em detergente ácido indigestível em alimentos por procedimento in situAnalytical methodsFeed analysisIndigestible fiberRepeatabilityReproducibility.Análise de alimentosFibra indigestívelMétodos de análisesRepetibilidadeReprodutibilidade.The objective of this collaborative study was to evaluate the indigestible neutral detergent fiber (iNDF) and indigestible acid detergent fiber (iADF) content in feeds in six laboratories from institutions linked to the National Institute of Science and Technology in Animal Science (INCT-CA). Six feeds were evaluated: signal grass hay, sugarcane, corn silage, soybean meal, corn and citrus pulp. Estimated levels of iNDF and iADF proved to be dependent on the laboratory in which the analysis was performed. It was found that differences between laboratories ranged from 2.40 percentage points for soybean meal to 8.05 percentage points for sugarcane for iNDF analysis and from 1.79 percentage points for corn to 10.06 percentage points for hay for iADF analysis. It was observed that the individual evaluation of each material, the total random variation of the results between laboratories ranged from 88.75 to 96.77% and 88.75 to 98.40% for iNDF and iADF analysis, respectively. The iNDF and iADF levels are dependent on the interaction effect between the evaluated material and laboratory and have low reproducibility; this may be a consequence of the differences between the methods practiced by each laboratory, demonstrating lack of standardization of procedures used by the laboratories.Objetivou-se conduzir estudo colaborativo para avaliação dos teores de fibra em detergente neutro indigestível (FDNi) e fibra em detergente ácido indigestível (FDAi) em alimentos em seis laboratórios de instituições integrantes do Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Ciência Animal (INCTCA). Avaliaram-se seis alimentos: feno de capim-braquiária, cana-de-açúcar, silagem de milho, farelo de soja, milho grão e polpa cítrica. Os teores estimados de FDNi e FDAi se mostraram dependentes do laboratório em que a análise foi realizada. Verificou-se que as diferenças entre laboratórios variaram de 2,40 pontos percentuais para o farelo de soja a 8,05 pontos percentuais para a cana-de-açúcar para a análise de FDNi e de 1,79 ponto percentual para o milho a 10,06 pontos percentuais para o feno para a análise de FDAi. Observou-se que na avaliação individual de cada material, a variação aleatória total dos resultados entre laboratórios correspondeu de 88,75 a 96,77% e de 88,75 a 98,40% para as análises de FDNi e FDAi, respectivamente. Os teores de FDNi e FDAi são dependentes do efeito de interação do material avaliado e do laboratório e apresentam baixa reprodutibilidade, possível reflexo das diferenças entre os métodos praticados por cada laboratório, demonstrando falta de padronização dos procedimentos adotados pelos laboratórios.UEL2016-09-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTrabalho de Pesquisa; Experimento Científicoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2354610.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4Supl1p2589Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 4Supl1 (2016); 2589-2600Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 4Supl1 (2016); 2589-26001679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/23546/19607Copyright (c) 2016 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Marjorrie Augusto deDetmann, EdenioRocha, Gabriel CiprianoFranco, Marcia de OliveiraBatista, Erick DarlissonValadares Filho, Sebastião de CamposBerchielli, Telma Teresinha2022-11-30T15:32:01Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23546Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-11-30T15:32:01Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Collaborative study to evaluate the indigestible neutral detergent fiber and indigestible acid detergent fiber contents in feeds by in situ procedure
Estudo colaborativo para avaliação dos teores de fibra em detergente neutro indigestível e fibra em detergente ácido indigestível em alimentos por procedimento in situ
title Collaborative study to evaluate the indigestible neutral detergent fiber and indigestible acid detergent fiber contents in feeds by in situ procedure
spellingShingle Collaborative study to evaluate the indigestible neutral detergent fiber and indigestible acid detergent fiber contents in feeds by in situ procedure
Souza, Marjorrie Augusto de
Analytical methods
Feed analysis
Indigestible fiber
Repeatability
Reproducibility.
Análise de alimentos
Fibra indigestível
Métodos de análises
Repetibilidade
Reprodutibilidade.
title_short Collaborative study to evaluate the indigestible neutral detergent fiber and indigestible acid detergent fiber contents in feeds by in situ procedure
title_full Collaborative study to evaluate the indigestible neutral detergent fiber and indigestible acid detergent fiber contents in feeds by in situ procedure
title_fullStr Collaborative study to evaluate the indigestible neutral detergent fiber and indigestible acid detergent fiber contents in feeds by in situ procedure
title_full_unstemmed Collaborative study to evaluate the indigestible neutral detergent fiber and indigestible acid detergent fiber contents in feeds by in situ procedure
title_sort Collaborative study to evaluate the indigestible neutral detergent fiber and indigestible acid detergent fiber contents in feeds by in situ procedure
author Souza, Marjorrie Augusto de
author_facet Souza, Marjorrie Augusto de
Detmann, Edenio
Rocha, Gabriel Cipriano
Franco, Marcia de Oliveira
Batista, Erick Darlisson
Valadares Filho, Sebastião de Campos
Berchielli, Telma Teresinha
author_role author
author2 Detmann, Edenio
Rocha, Gabriel Cipriano
Franco, Marcia de Oliveira
Batista, Erick Darlisson
Valadares Filho, Sebastião de Campos
Berchielli, Telma Teresinha
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Marjorrie Augusto de
Detmann, Edenio
Rocha, Gabriel Cipriano
Franco, Marcia de Oliveira
Batista, Erick Darlisson
Valadares Filho, Sebastião de Campos
Berchielli, Telma Teresinha
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Analytical methods
Feed analysis
Indigestible fiber
Repeatability
Reproducibility.
Análise de alimentos
Fibra indigestível
Métodos de análises
Repetibilidade
Reprodutibilidade.
topic Analytical methods
Feed analysis
Indigestible fiber
Repeatability
Reproducibility.
Análise de alimentos
Fibra indigestível
Métodos de análises
Repetibilidade
Reprodutibilidade.
description The objective of this collaborative study was to evaluate the indigestible neutral detergent fiber (iNDF) and indigestible acid detergent fiber (iADF) content in feeds in six laboratories from institutions linked to the National Institute of Science and Technology in Animal Science (INCT-CA). Six feeds were evaluated: signal grass hay, sugarcane, corn silage, soybean meal, corn and citrus pulp. Estimated levels of iNDF and iADF proved to be dependent on the laboratory in which the analysis was performed. It was found that differences between laboratories ranged from 2.40 percentage points for soybean meal to 8.05 percentage points for sugarcane for iNDF analysis and from 1.79 percentage points for corn to 10.06 percentage points for hay for iADF analysis. It was observed that the individual evaluation of each material, the total random variation of the results between laboratories ranged from 88.75 to 96.77% and 88.75 to 98.40% for iNDF and iADF analysis, respectively. The iNDF and iADF levels are dependent on the interaction effect between the evaluated material and laboratory and have low reproducibility; this may be a consequence of the differences between the methods practiced by each laboratory, demonstrating lack of standardization of procedures used by the laboratories.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Trabalho de Pesquisa; Experimento Científico
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/23546
10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4Supl1p2589
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/23546
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4Supl1p2589
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/23546/19607
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 37 No. 4Supl1 (2016); 2589-2600
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 37 n. 4Supl1 (2016); 2589-2600
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306075105656832