Quantitative losses in mechanized harvesting corn crop in small footprint and conventional

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Loureiro, Danilo Roberto
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Fernandes, Haroldo Carlos, Teixeira, Mauri Martins, Leite, Daniel Mariano, Costa, Marcelo Marques
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/6464
Resumo: The objective of this study was to evaluate the quantitative losses occurred in the mechanical harvesting of the corn grown in conventional and reduced gaps. The experimental design was randomized blocks with three replications and treatments distributed in a factorial (2 x 3 x 3), and two spacings (0.45 m and 0.90 m), three speeds of the combine (1.8 km.h-1 3.5 km.h-1 and 4.1 km.h-1) and three openings of the concave (25 mm, 30 mm and 35 mm). For treatments where the spacing was 0.45 m, the harvester worked with a power of two lines dividing line between the platform crop while in treatments where the spacing was 0.90 m, the harvester worked with a power dividing line between a line of platform. The plant population was the same for the two spacings used in the experiment. The natural losses were higher in the conventional spacing, but the header losses of harvest had the lowest use this space at a speed of 3.5 km.h-1. As maiores perdas ocorreram nos mecanismos internos da colhedora ocorreu quando se utiliza a abertura côncava de 30 mm a uma velocidade de 3,5 km.h-1. Total losses accounted for 8.2% and 7.3% of the average productivity in the gaps of 0.45 m 0.9 m respectively.
id UEL-11_4e5ce58167f815218cb91cc458f83369
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/6464
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Quantitative losses in mechanized harvesting corn crop in small footprint and conventionalPerdas quantitativas na colheita mecanizada do milho cultivado em espaçamentos reduzido e convencionalHarvesterAgricultural machineryZea mays L.ColhedoraMáquinas agrícolasZea mays L.The objective of this study was to evaluate the quantitative losses occurred in the mechanical harvesting of the corn grown in conventional and reduced gaps. The experimental design was randomized blocks with three replications and treatments distributed in a factorial (2 x 3 x 3), and two spacings (0.45 m and 0.90 m), three speeds of the combine (1.8 km.h-1 3.5 km.h-1 and 4.1 km.h-1) and three openings of the concave (25 mm, 30 mm and 35 mm). For treatments where the spacing was 0.45 m, the harvester worked with a power of two lines dividing line between the platform crop while in treatments where the spacing was 0.90 m, the harvester worked with a power dividing line between a line of platform. The plant population was the same for the two spacings used in the experiment. The natural losses were higher in the conventional spacing, but the header losses of harvest had the lowest use this space at a speed of 3.5 km.h-1. As maiores perdas ocorreram nos mecanismos internos da colhedora ocorreu quando se utiliza a abertura côncava de 30 mm a uma velocidade de 3,5 km.h-1. Total losses accounted for 8.2% and 7.3% of the average productivity in the gaps of 0.45 m 0.9 m respectively.Objetivou-se com este trabalho, avaliar as perdas quantitativas ocorridas na colheita mecanizada do milho cultivado em espaçamentos reduzido e convencional. O delineamento experimental foi o de blocos casualizados com três repetições em esquema fatorial (2 x 3 x 3), sendo dois espaçamentos ( 0,45m e 0,90m): três velocidades da colhedora (1,8 km.h-1 3,5 km.h-1 e 4,1 km.h-1) e três aberturas do côncavo (25 mm, 30 mm e 35 mm). Para os tratamentos onde o espaçamento entre linhas foi de 0,45 m, a colhedora trabalhou com uma alimentação de duas linhas entre os divisores de linha da plataforma de colheita enquanto nos tratamentos onde o espaçamento foi de 0,90 m, a colhedora trabalhou com uma alimentação de uma linha entre os divisores de linha da plataforma. A população de plantas foi a mesma para os dois espaçamentos utilizados no experimento. As perdas naturais foram maiores nos tratamentos com espaçamento convencional, porém as perdas na plataforma de colheita apresentaram os menores valores utilizando esse espaçamento na velocidade de 3,5 km.h-1. As maiores perdas ocorridas nos mecanismos internos da colhedora ocorreram quando se utilizou abertura do côncavo de 30 mm a uma velocidade de 3,5 km.h-1. As perdas totais representaram 8,2% e 7,3% da produtividade media nos espaçamentos de 0,45 m e 0,9 m respectivamente.UEL2012-05-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Empírica de Campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/646410.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n2p565Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2012); 565-574Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 33 n. 2 (2012); 565-5741679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/6464/10473Copyright (c) 2012 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLoureiro, Danilo RobertoFernandes, Haroldo CarlosTeixeira, Mauri MartinsLeite, Daniel MarianoCosta, Marcelo Marques2023-01-27T15:15:21Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/6464Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2023-01-27T15:15:21Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quantitative losses in mechanized harvesting corn crop in small footprint and conventional
Perdas quantitativas na colheita mecanizada do milho cultivado em espaçamentos reduzido e convencional
title Quantitative losses in mechanized harvesting corn crop in small footprint and conventional
spellingShingle Quantitative losses in mechanized harvesting corn crop in small footprint and conventional
Loureiro, Danilo Roberto
Harvester
Agricultural machinery
Zea mays L.
Colhedora
Máquinas agrícolas
Zea mays L.
title_short Quantitative losses in mechanized harvesting corn crop in small footprint and conventional
title_full Quantitative losses in mechanized harvesting corn crop in small footprint and conventional
title_fullStr Quantitative losses in mechanized harvesting corn crop in small footprint and conventional
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative losses in mechanized harvesting corn crop in small footprint and conventional
title_sort Quantitative losses in mechanized harvesting corn crop in small footprint and conventional
author Loureiro, Danilo Roberto
author_facet Loureiro, Danilo Roberto
Fernandes, Haroldo Carlos
Teixeira, Mauri Martins
Leite, Daniel Mariano
Costa, Marcelo Marques
author_role author
author2 Fernandes, Haroldo Carlos
Teixeira, Mauri Martins
Leite, Daniel Mariano
Costa, Marcelo Marques
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Loureiro, Danilo Roberto
Fernandes, Haroldo Carlos
Teixeira, Mauri Martins
Leite, Daniel Mariano
Costa, Marcelo Marques
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Harvester
Agricultural machinery
Zea mays L.
Colhedora
Máquinas agrícolas
Zea mays L.
topic Harvester
Agricultural machinery
Zea mays L.
Colhedora
Máquinas agrícolas
Zea mays L.
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the quantitative losses occurred in the mechanical harvesting of the corn grown in conventional and reduced gaps. The experimental design was randomized blocks with three replications and treatments distributed in a factorial (2 x 3 x 3), and two spacings (0.45 m and 0.90 m), three speeds of the combine (1.8 km.h-1 3.5 km.h-1 and 4.1 km.h-1) and three openings of the concave (25 mm, 30 mm and 35 mm). For treatments where the spacing was 0.45 m, the harvester worked with a power of two lines dividing line between the platform crop while in treatments where the spacing was 0.90 m, the harvester worked with a power dividing line between a line of platform. The plant population was the same for the two spacings used in the experiment. The natural losses were higher in the conventional spacing, but the header losses of harvest had the lowest use this space at a speed of 3.5 km.h-1. As maiores perdas ocorreram nos mecanismos internos da colhedora ocorreu quando se utiliza a abertura côncava de 30 mm a uma velocidade de 3,5 km.h-1. Total losses accounted for 8.2% and 7.3% of the average productivity in the gaps of 0.45 m 0.9 m respectively.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-05-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa Empírica de Campo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/6464
10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n2p565
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/6464
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n2p565
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/6464/10473
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2012 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2012 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2012); 565-574
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 33 n. 2 (2012); 565-574
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306063766355968