Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2303 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to determine yield capacity and gross income of ‘Chinês’ and ‘Macaquinho’ taro cultivars under monocrop and intrercrop systems with ‘Grand Rapids Nacional’ lettuce in order to offer to producers a new alternative of production. Harvest of lettuce was done on 57 days after sowing and of taro on 285 days after planting. Fresh and dried masses of aerial parts of lettuce plants were not influenced significantly by the cultivation system. Fresh mass of aerial parts of ‘Chinês’ taro plants was significantly higher in 1.46 t ha-1 than ‘Macaquinho’ , but it was not affected by cultivation system. Fresh mass of ‘Macaquinho’ corms was superior in 5.83 t ha-1 compared with ‘Chinês’. Fresh mass of big commercial cormel of ‘Macaquinho’ (23.30 t ha-1) was significantly higher than “Chinês”, but with fresh mass of small commercial cormel occurred the inverse. Both two consortia were economic viable, but lettuce/’Macaquinho’ taro consortium was the best (R$ 83,664.00 ha-1), because it can induce a gain of R$ 50,664 ha-1 in relation to monocrop of lettuce, and a gain of R$ 21,768 ha-1 in relation to lettuce/’Chinês’ taro consortium. |
id |
UEL-11_5bf84884d351770faf17e0427472d2b3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2303 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuceProdução e renda bruta de dois cultivares de taro, em cultivo solteiro e consorciado com alfaceColocasia esculentaLactuca sativaIntercropProductivityIncome.Colocasia esculentaLactuca sativaAssociação de culturasProdutividadeLucro.The objective of this work was to determine yield capacity and gross income of ‘Chinês’ and ‘Macaquinho’ taro cultivars under monocrop and intrercrop systems with ‘Grand Rapids Nacional’ lettuce in order to offer to producers a new alternative of production. Harvest of lettuce was done on 57 days after sowing and of taro on 285 days after planting. Fresh and dried masses of aerial parts of lettuce plants were not influenced significantly by the cultivation system. Fresh mass of aerial parts of ‘Chinês’ taro plants was significantly higher in 1.46 t ha-1 than ‘Macaquinho’ , but it was not affected by cultivation system. Fresh mass of ‘Macaquinho’ corms was superior in 5.83 t ha-1 compared with ‘Chinês’. Fresh mass of big commercial cormel of ‘Macaquinho’ (23.30 t ha-1) was significantly higher than “Chinês”, but with fresh mass of small commercial cormel occurred the inverse. Both two consortia were economic viable, but lettuce/’Macaquinho’ taro consortium was the best (R$ 83,664.00 ha-1), because it can induce a gain of R$ 50,664 ha-1 in relation to monocrop of lettuce, and a gain of R$ 21,768 ha-1 in relation to lettuce/’Chinês’ taro consortium.O objetivo do trabalho foi determinar a capacidade produtiva e a renda bruta dos cultivares de taro ‘Chinês’ e ‘Macaquinho’, sob cultivo solteiro e consorciado com a alface ‘Grand Rapids Nacional’, visando oferecer aos agricultores nova alternativa de produção. A colheita da alface realizou-se aos 57 dias após a semeadura e a dos taros, aos 285 dias após o plantio. As massas fresca e seca da parte aérea das plantas de alface não foram influenciadas significativamente pelo sistema de cultivo. A massa fresca da parte aérea das plantas do taro ‘Chinês’ (7,43 t ha-1) foi significativamente maior em 1,46 t ha-1 à do ‘Macaquinho’, mas não foi afetada pela forma de cultivo. A massa fresca de rizomas-mãe do ‘Macaquinho’ superou em 5,83 t ha-1 à do ‘Chinês’. A massa fresca de rizoma-filho comercial grande do ‘Macaquinho’ (23,30 t ha-1) foi significativamente maior que a do ‘Chinês’, mas com a massa fresca de rizoma-filho comercial pequeno ocorreu o inverso. Os dois consórcios foram viáveis economicamente, mas, o consórcio alface x taro ‘Macaquinho’ foi o melhor (R$ 83.664,00 ha-1), porque poderia ter induzido ganho de R$ 50.664 ha-1 em relação à alface solteira e de R$ 21.768 ha-1, em relação ao consórcio da alface x taro ‘Chinês’.UEL2005-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/230310.5433/1679-0359.2005v26n3p283Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 26 No. 3 (2005); 283-290Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 26 n. 3 (2005); 283-2901679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2303/1983Zárate, Néstor Antonio HerediaVieira, Maria do CarmoOliveira, Antonio Carlos Peixoto deLima, Andréa Alves deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2009-10-08T13:15:46Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2303Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2009-10-08T13:15:46Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce Produção e renda bruta de dois cultivares de taro, em cultivo solteiro e consorciado com alface |
title |
Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce |
spellingShingle |
Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia Colocasia esculenta Lactuca sativa Intercrop Productivity Income. Colocasia esculenta Lactuca sativa Associação de culturas Produtividade Lucro. |
title_short |
Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce |
title_full |
Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce |
title_fullStr |
Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce |
title_full_unstemmed |
Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce |
title_sort |
Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce |
author |
Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia |
author_facet |
Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia Vieira, Maria do Carmo Oliveira, Antonio Carlos Peixoto de Lima, Andréa Alves de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vieira, Maria do Carmo Oliveira, Antonio Carlos Peixoto de Lima, Andréa Alves de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia Vieira, Maria do Carmo Oliveira, Antonio Carlos Peixoto de Lima, Andréa Alves de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Colocasia esculenta Lactuca sativa Intercrop Productivity Income. Colocasia esculenta Lactuca sativa Associação de culturas Produtividade Lucro. |
topic |
Colocasia esculenta Lactuca sativa Intercrop Productivity Income. Colocasia esculenta Lactuca sativa Associação de culturas Produtividade Lucro. |
description |
The objective of this work was to determine yield capacity and gross income of ‘Chinês’ and ‘Macaquinho’ taro cultivars under monocrop and intrercrop systems with ‘Grand Rapids Nacional’ lettuce in order to offer to producers a new alternative of production. Harvest of lettuce was done on 57 days after sowing and of taro on 285 days after planting. Fresh and dried masses of aerial parts of lettuce plants were not influenced significantly by the cultivation system. Fresh mass of aerial parts of ‘Chinês’ taro plants was significantly higher in 1.46 t ha-1 than ‘Macaquinho’ , but it was not affected by cultivation system. Fresh mass of ‘Macaquinho’ corms was superior in 5.83 t ha-1 compared with ‘Chinês’. Fresh mass of big commercial cormel of ‘Macaquinho’ (23.30 t ha-1) was significantly higher than “Chinês”, but with fresh mass of small commercial cormel occurred the inverse. Both two consortia were economic viable, but lettuce/’Macaquinho’ taro consortium was the best (R$ 83,664.00 ha-1), because it can induce a gain of R$ 50,664 ha-1 in relation to monocrop of lettuce, and a gain of R$ 21,768 ha-1 in relation to lettuce/’Chinês’ taro consortium. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2303 10.5433/1679-0359.2005v26n3p283 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2303 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2005v26n3p283 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2303/1983 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 26 No. 3 (2005); 283-290 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 26 n. 3 (2005); 283-290 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306057638477824 |