Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Vieira, Maria do Carmo, Oliveira, Antonio Carlos Peixoto de, Lima, Andréa Alves de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2303
Resumo: The objective of this work was to determine yield capacity and gross income of ‘Chinês’ and ‘Macaquinho’ taro cultivars under monocrop and intrercrop systems with ‘Grand Rapids Nacional’ lettuce in order to offer to producers a new alternative of production. Harvest of lettuce was done on 57 days after sowing and of taro on 285 days after planting. Fresh and dried masses of aerial parts of lettuce plants were not influenced significantly by the cultivation system. Fresh mass of aerial parts of ‘Chinês’ taro plants was significantly higher in 1.46 t ha-1 than ‘Macaquinho’ , but it was not affected by cultivation system. Fresh mass of ‘Macaquinho’ corms was superior in 5.83 t ha-1 compared with ‘Chinês’. Fresh mass of big commercial cormel of ‘Macaquinho’ (23.30 t ha-1) was significantly higher than “Chinês”, but with fresh mass of small commercial cormel occurred the inverse. Both two consortia were economic viable, but lettuce/’Macaquinho’ taro consortium was the best (R$ 83,664.00 ha-1), because it can induce a gain of R$ 50,664 ha-1 in relation to monocrop of lettuce, and a gain of R$ 21,768 ha-1 in relation to lettuce/’Chinês’ taro consortium.
id UEL-11_5bf84884d351770faf17e0427472d2b3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2303
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuceProdução e renda bruta de dois cultivares de taro, em cultivo solteiro e consorciado com alfaceColocasia esculentaLactuca sativaIntercropProductivityIncome.Colocasia esculentaLactuca sativaAssociação de culturasProdutividadeLucro.The objective of this work was to determine yield capacity and gross income of ‘Chinês’ and ‘Macaquinho’ taro cultivars under monocrop and intrercrop systems with ‘Grand Rapids Nacional’ lettuce in order to offer to producers a new alternative of production. Harvest of lettuce was done on 57 days after sowing and of taro on 285 days after planting. Fresh and dried masses of aerial parts of lettuce plants were not influenced significantly by the cultivation system. Fresh mass of aerial parts of ‘Chinês’ taro plants was significantly higher in 1.46 t ha-1 than ‘Macaquinho’ , but it was not affected by cultivation system. Fresh mass of ‘Macaquinho’ corms was superior in 5.83 t ha-1 compared with ‘Chinês’. Fresh mass of big commercial cormel of ‘Macaquinho’ (23.30 t ha-1) was significantly higher than “Chinês”, but with fresh mass of small commercial cormel occurred the inverse. Both two consortia were economic viable, but lettuce/’Macaquinho’ taro consortium was the best (R$ 83,664.00 ha-1), because it can induce a gain of R$ 50,664 ha-1 in relation to monocrop of lettuce, and a gain of R$ 21,768 ha-1 in relation to lettuce/’Chinês’ taro consortium.O objetivo do trabalho foi determinar a capacidade produtiva e a renda bruta dos cultivares de taro ‘Chinês’ e ‘Macaquinho’, sob cultivo solteiro e consorciado com a alface ‘Grand Rapids Nacional’, visando oferecer aos agricultores nova alternativa de produção. A colheita da alface realizou-se aos 57 dias após a semeadura e a dos taros, aos 285 dias após o plantio. As massas fresca e seca da parte aérea das plantas de alface não foram influenciadas significativamente pelo sistema de cultivo. A massa fresca da parte aérea das plantas do taro ‘Chinês’ (7,43 t ha-1) foi significativamente maior em 1,46 t ha-1 à do ‘Macaquinho’, mas não foi afetada pela forma de cultivo. A massa fresca de rizomas-mãe do ‘Macaquinho’ superou em 5,83 t ha-1 à do ‘Chinês’. A massa fresca de rizoma-filho comercial grande do ‘Macaquinho’ (23,30 t ha-1) foi significativamente maior que a do ‘Chinês’, mas com a massa fresca de rizoma-filho comercial pequeno ocorreu o inverso. Os dois consórcios foram viáveis economicamente, mas, o consórcio alface x taro ‘Macaquinho’ foi o melhor (R$ 83.664,00 ha-1), porque poderia ter induzido ganho de R$ 50.664 ha-1 em relação à alface solteira e de R$ 21.768 ha-1, em relação ao consórcio da alface x taro ‘Chinês’.UEL2005-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/230310.5433/1679-0359.2005v26n3p283Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 26 No. 3 (2005); 283-290Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 26 n. 3 (2005); 283-2901679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2303/1983Zárate, Néstor Antonio HerediaVieira, Maria do CarmoOliveira, Antonio Carlos Peixoto deLima, Andréa Alves deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2009-10-08T13:15:46Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2303Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2009-10-08T13:15:46Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce
Produção e renda bruta de dois cultivares de taro, em cultivo solteiro e consorciado com alface
title Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce
spellingShingle Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce
Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
Colocasia esculenta
Lactuca sativa
Intercrop
Productivity
Income.
Colocasia esculenta
Lactuca sativa
Associação de culturas
Produtividade
Lucro.
title_short Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce
title_full Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce
title_fullStr Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce
title_full_unstemmed Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce
title_sort Yield and gross income of two cultivars of taro in monocrop and intercrop systems with lettuce
author Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
author_facet Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
Vieira, Maria do Carmo
Oliveira, Antonio Carlos Peixoto de
Lima, Andréa Alves de
author_role author
author2 Vieira, Maria do Carmo
Oliveira, Antonio Carlos Peixoto de
Lima, Andréa Alves de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zárate, Néstor Antonio Heredia
Vieira, Maria do Carmo
Oliveira, Antonio Carlos Peixoto de
Lima, Andréa Alves de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Colocasia esculenta
Lactuca sativa
Intercrop
Productivity
Income.
Colocasia esculenta
Lactuca sativa
Associação de culturas
Produtividade
Lucro.
topic Colocasia esculenta
Lactuca sativa
Intercrop
Productivity
Income.
Colocasia esculenta
Lactuca sativa
Associação de culturas
Produtividade
Lucro.
description The objective of this work was to determine yield capacity and gross income of ‘Chinês’ and ‘Macaquinho’ taro cultivars under monocrop and intrercrop systems with ‘Grand Rapids Nacional’ lettuce in order to offer to producers a new alternative of production. Harvest of lettuce was done on 57 days after sowing and of taro on 285 days after planting. Fresh and dried masses of aerial parts of lettuce plants were not influenced significantly by the cultivation system. Fresh mass of aerial parts of ‘Chinês’ taro plants was significantly higher in 1.46 t ha-1 than ‘Macaquinho’ , but it was not affected by cultivation system. Fresh mass of ‘Macaquinho’ corms was superior in 5.83 t ha-1 compared with ‘Chinês’. Fresh mass of big commercial cormel of ‘Macaquinho’ (23.30 t ha-1) was significantly higher than “Chinês”, but with fresh mass of small commercial cormel occurred the inverse. Both two consortia were economic viable, but lettuce/’Macaquinho’ taro consortium was the best (R$ 83,664.00 ha-1), because it can induce a gain of R$ 50,664 ha-1 in relation to monocrop of lettuce, and a gain of R$ 21,768 ha-1 in relation to lettuce/’Chinês’ taro consortium.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-06-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2303
10.5433/1679-0359.2005v26n3p283
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2303
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2005v26n3p283
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2303/1983
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 26 No. 3 (2005); 283-290
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 26 n. 3 (2005); 283-290
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306057638477824