Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cabral, Carlos Eduardo Avelino
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Barros, Lívia Vieira de, Abreu, Joadil Gonçalves de, Silva, Felipe Gomes da, Cabral, Carla Heloisa Avelino, Behling Neto, Arthur, Andrade, Flávio Cunha Ferreira, Sales, Kyron Cabral, Herrera, Dayenne Mariane, Dellarmelinda, Thainara Matilde Muniz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26893
Resumo: This study was conducted to evaluate two systems of production: integration between teak and forage (silvopastoral system) and forage only (monoculture). The forage species used was Marandu palisade grass (Urochloa brizantha cv. Marandu). In January 2009, part of the pasture was desiccated and the teak (Tectona grandis) was implemented in a 3 × 4 m spacing arrangement, and at every five rows, a space between rows of 6 m was established, providing a population of 750 trees per hectare. Alongside the development of the trees, the Marandu palisade grass pasture was reestablished. In February 2015, the animals were removed from the experimental area and, in March, the pasture degradation, the density and the mass of tillers was assessed. The following variables were evaluated: sward height; forage mass, percentage of leaf blade, stem+sheath and senescent material; leaf blade:stem+sheath ratio; and live:dead material ratio. The experimental design was completely randomized, with 12 replicates. Treatments consisted of two systems (silvopastoral and monoculture). The total forage accumulation was higher in the monoculture system. The sward height and the percentage of stem+sheath were higher in the integrated system, while the percentage of leaf blade and the leaf blade:stem+sheath ratio were higher in the system exclusively with forage. In conclusion, Marandu palisade grass tolerates shading in a high density spacing silvopastoral system, but the degradation process is more intense compared to grass in monoculture, and the use of Marandu palisade grass in silvopastoral systems changes the forage mass and the structure of the produced forage.
id UEL-11_60f1929d4c7969e049c21ab5b2f08d58
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26893
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral systemCapim-Marandu consorciado com Teca adensada em sistema silvipastorilForage participationShadingSoil coverTectona grandisUrochloa brizantha.Cobertura do soloParticipação forrageiraSombreamentoTectona grandisUrochloa brizantha.This study was conducted to evaluate two systems of production: integration between teak and forage (silvopastoral system) and forage only (monoculture). The forage species used was Marandu palisade grass (Urochloa brizantha cv. Marandu). In January 2009, part of the pasture was desiccated and the teak (Tectona grandis) was implemented in a 3 × 4 m spacing arrangement, and at every five rows, a space between rows of 6 m was established, providing a population of 750 trees per hectare. Alongside the development of the trees, the Marandu palisade grass pasture was reestablished. In February 2015, the animals were removed from the experimental area and, in March, the pasture degradation, the density and the mass of tillers was assessed. The following variables were evaluated: sward height; forage mass, percentage of leaf blade, stem+sheath and senescent material; leaf blade:stem+sheath ratio; and live:dead material ratio. The experimental design was completely randomized, with 12 replicates. Treatments consisted of two systems (silvopastoral and monoculture). The total forage accumulation was higher in the monoculture system. The sward height and the percentage of stem+sheath were higher in the integrated system, while the percentage of leaf blade and the leaf blade:stem+sheath ratio were higher in the system exclusively with forage. In conclusion, Marandu palisade grass tolerates shading in a high density spacing silvopastoral system, but the degradation process is more intense compared to grass in monoculture, and the use of Marandu palisade grass in silvopastoral systems changes the forage mass and the structure of the produced forage.Este trabalho foi realizado para avaliar dois sistemas de produção: integração entre teca e forragem (silvipastoril) e somente forragem (monocultivo). A forrageira utilizada foi o capim-Marandu. Em janeiro de 2009, parte do pasto foi dessecado e implantou-se Teca (Tectona grandis) em espaçamento de 3 x 4 m e a cada cinco linhas estabeleceu-se um espaçamento de 6 m entre linhas, o que garantiu uma população de 750 árvores por hectare. Paralelamente ao desenvolvimento das árvores houve o restabelecimento do pasto de capim-Marandu. Em fevereiro de 2015, retirou-se os animais da área e em março avaliou-se o estádio de degradação do pasto, a densidade e a massa de perfilhos. Avaliou-se também a altura do dossel forrageiro, a massa de forragem e as porcentagens de: lâmina foliar, colmo+bainha e material morto, a relação lâmina foliar/colmo+bainha e a relação vivo/não vivo. O delineamento experimental foi inteiramente casualizado, com dois tratamentos (silvipastoril e monocultivo) e doze repetições. A massa de forragem foi maior no sistema com monocultivo de capim-Marandu. A altura da forragem e a porcentagem de colmo + bainha foram maiores no sistema silvipastoril, já a porcentagem de lâmina foliar e a relação lâmina:colmo+bainha foram maiores para o sistema com monocultivo. Conclui-se que o capim-marandu tolera o sombreamento em sistema silvipastoril adensado, contudo o processo de degradação é mais intenso do que o capim em monocultivo e a utilização do capim-Marandu em sistemas silvipastoris altera a massa de forragem e a estrutura da forragem produzida.UEL2017-08-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa empírica de campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2689310.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4p2075Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4 (2017); 2075-2082Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4 (2017); 2075-20821679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26893/21383Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCabral, Carlos Eduardo AvelinoBarros, Lívia Vieira deAbreu, Joadil Gonçalves deSilva, Felipe Gomes daCabral, Carla Heloisa AvelinoBehling Neto, ArthurAndrade, Flávio Cunha FerreiraSales, Kyron CabralHerrera, Dayenne MarianeDellarmelinda, Thainara Matilde Muniz2022-10-24T12:45:07Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26893Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-24T12:45:07Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system
Capim-Marandu consorciado com Teca adensada em sistema silvipastoril
title Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system
spellingShingle Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system
Cabral, Carlos Eduardo Avelino
Forage participation
Shading
Soil cover
Tectona grandis
Urochloa brizantha.
Cobertura do solo
Participação forrageira
Sombreamento
Tectona grandis
Urochloa brizantha.
title_short Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system
title_full Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system
title_fullStr Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system
title_full_unstemmed Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system
title_sort Marandu palisade grass intercropped with densely spaced teak in silvopastoral system
author Cabral, Carlos Eduardo Avelino
author_facet Cabral, Carlos Eduardo Avelino
Barros, Lívia Vieira de
Abreu, Joadil Gonçalves de
Silva, Felipe Gomes da
Cabral, Carla Heloisa Avelino
Behling Neto, Arthur
Andrade, Flávio Cunha Ferreira
Sales, Kyron Cabral
Herrera, Dayenne Mariane
Dellarmelinda, Thainara Matilde Muniz
author_role author
author2 Barros, Lívia Vieira de
Abreu, Joadil Gonçalves de
Silva, Felipe Gomes da
Cabral, Carla Heloisa Avelino
Behling Neto, Arthur
Andrade, Flávio Cunha Ferreira
Sales, Kyron Cabral
Herrera, Dayenne Mariane
Dellarmelinda, Thainara Matilde Muniz
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cabral, Carlos Eduardo Avelino
Barros, Lívia Vieira de
Abreu, Joadil Gonçalves de
Silva, Felipe Gomes da
Cabral, Carla Heloisa Avelino
Behling Neto, Arthur
Andrade, Flávio Cunha Ferreira
Sales, Kyron Cabral
Herrera, Dayenne Mariane
Dellarmelinda, Thainara Matilde Muniz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Forage participation
Shading
Soil cover
Tectona grandis
Urochloa brizantha.
Cobertura do solo
Participação forrageira
Sombreamento
Tectona grandis
Urochloa brizantha.
topic Forage participation
Shading
Soil cover
Tectona grandis
Urochloa brizantha.
Cobertura do solo
Participação forrageira
Sombreamento
Tectona grandis
Urochloa brizantha.
description This study was conducted to evaluate two systems of production: integration between teak and forage (silvopastoral system) and forage only (monoculture). The forage species used was Marandu palisade grass (Urochloa brizantha cv. Marandu). In January 2009, part of the pasture was desiccated and the teak (Tectona grandis) was implemented in a 3 × 4 m spacing arrangement, and at every five rows, a space between rows of 6 m was established, providing a population of 750 trees per hectare. Alongside the development of the trees, the Marandu palisade grass pasture was reestablished. In February 2015, the animals were removed from the experimental area and, in March, the pasture degradation, the density and the mass of tillers was assessed. The following variables were evaluated: sward height; forage mass, percentage of leaf blade, stem+sheath and senescent material; leaf blade:stem+sheath ratio; and live:dead material ratio. The experimental design was completely randomized, with 12 replicates. Treatments consisted of two systems (silvopastoral and monoculture). The total forage accumulation was higher in the monoculture system. The sward height and the percentage of stem+sheath were higher in the integrated system, while the percentage of leaf blade and the leaf blade:stem+sheath ratio were higher in the system exclusively with forage. In conclusion, Marandu palisade grass tolerates shading in a high density spacing silvopastoral system, but the degradation process is more intense compared to grass in monoculture, and the use of Marandu palisade grass in silvopastoral systems changes the forage mass and the structure of the produced forage.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa empírica de campo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26893
10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4p2075
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26893
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4p2075
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/26893/21383
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 38 No. 4 (2017); 2075-2082
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 38 n. 4 (2017); 2075-2082
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306076556886016