Evaluation of orange peel and corn silages with different protein additives

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinto, Andréa Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Mizubuti, Ivone Yurika, Ribeiro, Edson Luiz de Azambuja, Pereira, Elzânia Sales, Bumbieres Júnior, Valter Harry, Pimentel, Patricia Guimarães, Salmazo, Rafael, Carneiro, Maria Socorro de Souza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11788
Resumo: Experimental mini-silos were prepared, in a completely randomized design distributed in a 2 x 5 factorial arrangement, with two silages (orange peel and corn) and five treatments (without protein source; with urea; soybean meal; cotton seed meal and sunflower meal). The protein additives were added to each silage to achieve about 10% protein. The silos were opened 90 days after the make silages. The following determinations were accomplished: pH, lactic acid (LA), buffering capacity (BC), dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), calcium (Ca), total carbohydrates (TC), non fibrous carbohydrates (NFC) and in vitro digestibility (IVD). The protein additives increased the DM averages of the silages. The pH of silages varied from 3.41 to 3.95, being the lactic acid and in vitro digestibility higher to the orange peel silage when compared to the corn silage. It can be concluded that the orange peel silage to be preserved in silage form with protein source.
id UEL-11_92944323b32c3410ff8ebd6b7635d895
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11788
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of orange peel and corn silages with different protein additivesAvaliações das silagens de bagaço de laranja e de milho com diferentes aditivos protéicosBuffering capacityCotton seed mealLactic acidSoybean mealSunflower mealUrea.Ácido láticoCapacidade tampãoFarelo de algodãoFarelo de girassolFarelo de sojaUréia.Experimental mini-silos were prepared, in a completely randomized design distributed in a 2 x 5 factorial arrangement, with two silages (orange peel and corn) and five treatments (without protein source; with urea; soybean meal; cotton seed meal and sunflower meal). The protein additives were added to each silage to achieve about 10% protein. The silos were opened 90 days after the make silages. The following determinations were accomplished: pH, lactic acid (LA), buffering capacity (BC), dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), calcium (Ca), total carbohydrates (TC), non fibrous carbohydrates (NFC) and in vitro digestibility (IVD). The protein additives increased the DM averages of the silages. The pH of silages varied from 3.41 to 3.95, being the lactic acid and in vitro digestibility higher to the orange peel silage when compared to the corn silage. It can be concluded that the orange peel silage to be preserved in silage form with protein source.Foram preparados minisilos experimentais, em delineamento experimental inteiramente casualizado, distribuídos em arranjo fatorial 2 x 5, sendo, 2 tipos de silagem (bagaço de laranja e milho) e 5 tratamentos (sem fonte protéica; com uréia; farelo de soja; farelo de algodão e farelo de girassol). Os aditivos protéicos foram adicionados para que cada silagem obtivesse um teor protéico ao redor de 10%. Os silos foram abertos 90 dias após o preparo das silagens. Foram determinados pH, ácido lático (AL), capacidade tampão (CATP), matéria seca (MS), proteína bruta (PB), nitrogênio amoniacal (NNH3), extrato etéreo (EE), fibra em detergente neutro (FDN), cálcio (Ca), carboidratos totais (CT), carboidratos não fibrosos (CNF) e digestibilidade in vitro (DIV). Os aditivos protéicos aumentaram os teores de MS das silagens. O pH das silagens variou de 3,41 a 3,95, sendo a produção de ácido lático e a digestibilidade in vitro maior para a silagem de bagaço de laranja quando comparada à silagem de milho. Conclui-se que a silagem de bagaço de laranja pode ser adequadamente preservada na forma de silagem com aditivos protéicos.UEL2013-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1178810.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n6Supl2p3305Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 33 No. 6Supl2 (2012); 3305-3314Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 33 n. 6Supl2 (2012); 3305-33141679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11788/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11788/32931Pinto, Andréa PereiraMizubuti, Ivone YurikaRibeiro, Edson Luiz de AzambujaPereira, Elzânia SalesBumbieres Júnior, Valter HarryPimentel, Patricia GuimarãesSalmazo, RafaelCarneiro, Maria Socorro de Souzainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-19T18:37:00Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11788Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-11-19T18:37Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of orange peel and corn silages with different protein additives
Avaliações das silagens de bagaço de laranja e de milho com diferentes aditivos protéicos
title Evaluation of orange peel and corn silages with different protein additives
spellingShingle Evaluation of orange peel and corn silages with different protein additives
Pinto, Andréa Pereira
Buffering capacity
Cotton seed meal
Lactic acid
Soybean meal
Sunflower meal
Urea.
Ácido lático
Capacidade tampão
Farelo de algodão
Farelo de girassol
Farelo de soja
Uréia.
title_short Evaluation of orange peel and corn silages with different protein additives
title_full Evaluation of orange peel and corn silages with different protein additives
title_fullStr Evaluation of orange peel and corn silages with different protein additives
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of orange peel and corn silages with different protein additives
title_sort Evaluation of orange peel and corn silages with different protein additives
author Pinto, Andréa Pereira
author_facet Pinto, Andréa Pereira
Mizubuti, Ivone Yurika
Ribeiro, Edson Luiz de Azambuja
Pereira, Elzânia Sales
Bumbieres Júnior, Valter Harry
Pimentel, Patricia Guimarães
Salmazo, Rafael
Carneiro, Maria Socorro de Souza
author_role author
author2 Mizubuti, Ivone Yurika
Ribeiro, Edson Luiz de Azambuja
Pereira, Elzânia Sales
Bumbieres Júnior, Valter Harry
Pimentel, Patricia Guimarães
Salmazo, Rafael
Carneiro, Maria Socorro de Souza
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinto, Andréa Pereira
Mizubuti, Ivone Yurika
Ribeiro, Edson Luiz de Azambuja
Pereira, Elzânia Sales
Bumbieres Júnior, Valter Harry
Pimentel, Patricia Guimarães
Salmazo, Rafael
Carneiro, Maria Socorro de Souza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Buffering capacity
Cotton seed meal
Lactic acid
Soybean meal
Sunflower meal
Urea.
Ácido lático
Capacidade tampão
Farelo de algodão
Farelo de girassol
Farelo de soja
Uréia.
topic Buffering capacity
Cotton seed meal
Lactic acid
Soybean meal
Sunflower meal
Urea.
Ácido lático
Capacidade tampão
Farelo de algodão
Farelo de girassol
Farelo de soja
Uréia.
description Experimental mini-silos were prepared, in a completely randomized design distributed in a 2 x 5 factorial arrangement, with two silages (orange peel and corn) and five treatments (without protein source; with urea; soybean meal; cotton seed meal and sunflower meal). The protein additives were added to each silage to achieve about 10% protein. The silos were opened 90 days after the make silages. The following determinations were accomplished: pH, lactic acid (LA), buffering capacity (BC), dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), calcium (Ca), total carbohydrates (TC), non fibrous carbohydrates (NFC) and in vitro digestibility (IVD). The protein additives increased the DM averages of the silages. The pH of silages varied from 3.41 to 3.95, being the lactic acid and in vitro digestibility higher to the orange peel silage when compared to the corn silage. It can be concluded that the orange peel silage to be preserved in silage form with protein source.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-02-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11788
10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n6Supl2p3305
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11788
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n6Supl2p3305
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11788/pdf
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/11788/32931
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 33 No. 6Supl2 (2012); 3305-3314
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 33 n. 6Supl2 (2012); 3305-3314
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1750315415152623616