Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2013 |
Other Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Download full: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14224 |
Summary: | A cross-sectional study in four swine feed mills aimed to evaluate the correlation between the score of the inspection checklist defined in the Normative Instruction 4 (IN 4/ Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply), and the enumeration of total coliforms throughout the manufacturing process. The most of non-conformities was found in the physical structure of the feed mills. Feed mill B showed the lowest number of unconformities while units A and D had the largest number of nonconformities. In 38.53% (489/1269) of the samples the presence of total coliform was detected, however no significant difference in the bacterial counts was observed between sampling sites and feed mills. The logistic regression pointed higher odds ratio (OR) for total coliforms isolation at dosing (OR = 9.51, 95% CI: 4.43 to 20.41), grinding (OR = 7.10, 95% CI = 3.27 to 15.40) and residues (OR = 6.21, 95% CI: 3.88 to 9.95) In spite of having the second score in the checklist inspection, feed mill C presented the highest odds for total coliforms isolation (OR= 2,43, IC 95%: 1,68-3,53). The data indicate no association between the score of checklist and the presence of hygienic indicators in feed mills. |
id |
UEL-11_b89d319c247d78f666fb0b2e09487bc8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14224 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed millsInspeção de boas práticas de fabricação e enumeração de coliformes totais em fábricas de ração para suínosFeedEnterobacteriaceaeGood manufacturing practices (GMP)Contamination levels.Ração animalEnterobacteriaceaeBoas práticas de fabricação (BPF)Níveis de contaminação.A cross-sectional study in four swine feed mills aimed to evaluate the correlation between the score of the inspection checklist defined in the Normative Instruction 4 (IN 4/ Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply), and the enumeration of total coliforms throughout the manufacturing process. The most of non-conformities was found in the physical structure of the feed mills. Feed mill B showed the lowest number of unconformities while units A and D had the largest number of nonconformities. In 38.53% (489/1269) of the samples the presence of total coliform was detected, however no significant difference in the bacterial counts was observed between sampling sites and feed mills. The logistic regression pointed higher odds ratio (OR) for total coliforms isolation at dosing (OR = 9.51, 95% CI: 4.43 to 20.41), grinding (OR = 7.10, 95% CI = 3.27 to 15.40) and residues (OR = 6.21, 95% CI: 3.88 to 9.95) In spite of having the second score in the checklist inspection, feed mill C presented the highest odds for total coliforms isolation (OR= 2,43, IC 95%: 1,68-3,53). The data indicate no association between the score of checklist and the presence of hygienic indicators in feed mills.Um estudo transversal realizado em quatro fábricas de ração para suínos foi realizado para avaliar o escore obtido no roteiro de inspeção de boas práticas de fabricação da Instrução Normativa 4 (Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento) e os níveis de coliformes totais presentes ao longo do processo de produção. A maioria das não conformidades foi encontrada na estrutura física das fábricas. A fábrica B apresentou o menor número de inconformidades, enquanto as fábricas A e D apresentaram o maior número de itens não conformes. Em 38,53% (489/1269) das amostras havia presença de coliformes totais, porém não houve diferença no número encontrado entre as amostras e fábricas. A regressão logística apontou maior razão de chance (OR) de isolamento de coliformes totais nas áreas de dosagem (OR=9,51, IC 95%: 4,43-20,41), moagem (OR=7,10; IC 95%: 3,27-15,40) e em resíduos (OR=6,21; IC 95%: 3,88-9,95). A fábrica C, apesar de ter obtido o segundo melhor escore no roteiro de inspeção, apresentou a maior chance de presença de coliformes totais (OR= 2,43, IC 95%: 1,68-3,53). Não houve associação entre o escore do roteiro de inspeção e a presença de indicadores de higiene em fábricas de ração.UEL2013-12-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1422410.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6Supl2p3767Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 34 No. 6Supl2 (2013); 3767-3776Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 34 n. 6Supl2 (2013); 3767-37761679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14224/pdf_161Pellegrini, Debora da Cruz PayaoPaim, Daniel dos SantosLima, Gustavo Julio Mello Monteiro deKich, Jalusa DeonColdebella, ArleiCardoso, Marisa Ribeiro de Itapemainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-19T18:36:04Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14224Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-11-19T18:36:04Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills Inspeção de boas práticas de fabricação e enumeração de coliformes totais em fábricas de ração para suínos |
title |
Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills |
spellingShingle |
Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills Pellegrini, Debora da Cruz Payao Feed Enterobacteriaceae Good manufacturing practices (GMP) Contamination levels. Ração animal Enterobacteriaceae Boas práticas de fabricação (BPF) Níveis de contaminação. |
title_short |
Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills |
title_full |
Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills |
title_fullStr |
Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills |
title_full_unstemmed |
Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills |
title_sort |
Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills |
author |
Pellegrini, Debora da Cruz Payao |
author_facet |
Pellegrini, Debora da Cruz Payao Paim, Daniel dos Santos Lima, Gustavo Julio Mello Monteiro de Kich, Jalusa Deon Coldebella, Arlei Cardoso, Marisa Ribeiro de Itapema |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Paim, Daniel dos Santos Lima, Gustavo Julio Mello Monteiro de Kich, Jalusa Deon Coldebella, Arlei Cardoso, Marisa Ribeiro de Itapema |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pellegrini, Debora da Cruz Payao Paim, Daniel dos Santos Lima, Gustavo Julio Mello Monteiro de Kich, Jalusa Deon Coldebella, Arlei Cardoso, Marisa Ribeiro de Itapema |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Feed Enterobacteriaceae Good manufacturing practices (GMP) Contamination levels. Ração animal Enterobacteriaceae Boas práticas de fabricação (BPF) Níveis de contaminação. |
topic |
Feed Enterobacteriaceae Good manufacturing practices (GMP) Contamination levels. Ração animal Enterobacteriaceae Boas práticas de fabricação (BPF) Níveis de contaminação. |
description |
A cross-sectional study in four swine feed mills aimed to evaluate the correlation between the score of the inspection checklist defined in the Normative Instruction 4 (IN 4/ Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply), and the enumeration of total coliforms throughout the manufacturing process. The most of non-conformities was found in the physical structure of the feed mills. Feed mill B showed the lowest number of unconformities while units A and D had the largest number of nonconformities. In 38.53% (489/1269) of the samples the presence of total coliform was detected, however no significant difference in the bacterial counts was observed between sampling sites and feed mills. The logistic regression pointed higher odds ratio (OR) for total coliforms isolation at dosing (OR = 9.51, 95% CI: 4.43 to 20.41), grinding (OR = 7.10, 95% CI = 3.27 to 15.40) and residues (OR = 6.21, 95% CI: 3.88 to 9.95) In spite of having the second score in the checklist inspection, feed mill C presented the highest odds for total coliforms isolation (OR= 2,43, IC 95%: 1,68-3,53). The data indicate no association between the score of checklist and the presence of hygienic indicators in feed mills. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-12-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14224 10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6Supl2p3767 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14224 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6Supl2p3767 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14224/pdf_161 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 34 No. 6Supl2 (2013); 3767-3776 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 34 n. 6Supl2 (2013); 3767-3776 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306069057470464 |