Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pellegrini, Debora da Cruz Payao
Publication Date: 2013
Other Authors: Paim, Daniel dos Santos, Lima, Gustavo Julio Mello Monteiro de, Kich, Jalusa Deon, Coldebella, Arlei, Cardoso, Marisa Ribeiro de Itapema
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Download full: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14224
Summary: A cross-sectional study in four swine feed mills aimed to evaluate the correlation between the score of the inspection checklist defined in the Normative Instruction 4 (IN 4/ Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply), and the enumeration of total coliforms throughout the manufacturing process. The most of non-conformities was found in the physical structure of the feed mills. Feed mill B showed the lowest number of unconformities while units A and D had the largest number of nonconformities. In 38.53% (489/1269) of the samples the presence of total coliform was detected, however no significant difference in the bacterial counts was observed between sampling sites and feed mills. The logistic regression pointed higher odds ratio (OR) for total coliforms isolation at dosing (OR = 9.51, 95% CI: 4.43 to 20.41), grinding (OR = 7.10, 95% CI = 3.27 to 15.40) and residues (OR = 6.21, 95% CI: 3.88 to 9.95) In spite of having the second score in the checklist inspection, feed mill C presented the highest odds for total coliforms isolation (OR= 2,43, IC 95%: 1,68-3,53). The data indicate no association between the score of checklist and the presence of hygienic indicators in feed mills.
id UEL-11_b89d319c247d78f666fb0b2e09487bc8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14224
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed millsInspeção de boas práticas de fabricação e enumeração de coliformes totais em fábricas de ração para suínosFeedEnterobacteriaceaeGood manufacturing practices (GMP)Contamination levels.Ração animalEnterobacteriaceaeBoas práticas de fabricação (BPF)Níveis de contaminação.A cross-sectional study in four swine feed mills aimed to evaluate the correlation between the score of the inspection checklist defined in the Normative Instruction 4 (IN 4/ Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply), and the enumeration of total coliforms throughout the manufacturing process. The most of non-conformities was found in the physical structure of the feed mills. Feed mill B showed the lowest number of unconformities while units A and D had the largest number of nonconformities. In 38.53% (489/1269) of the samples the presence of total coliform was detected, however no significant difference in the bacterial counts was observed between sampling sites and feed mills. The logistic regression pointed higher odds ratio (OR) for total coliforms isolation at dosing (OR = 9.51, 95% CI: 4.43 to 20.41), grinding (OR = 7.10, 95% CI = 3.27 to 15.40) and residues (OR = 6.21, 95% CI: 3.88 to 9.95) In spite of having the second score in the checklist inspection, feed mill C presented the highest odds for total coliforms isolation (OR= 2,43, IC 95%: 1,68-3,53). The data indicate no association between the score of checklist and the presence of hygienic indicators in feed mills.Um estudo transversal realizado em quatro fábricas de ração para suínos foi realizado para avaliar o escore obtido no roteiro de inspeção de boas práticas de fabricação da Instrução Normativa 4 (Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento) e os níveis de coliformes totais presentes ao longo do processo de produção. A maioria das não conformidades foi encontrada na estrutura física das fábricas. A fábrica B apresentou o menor número de inconformidades, enquanto as fábricas A e D apresentaram o maior número de itens não conformes. Em 38,53% (489/1269) das amostras havia presença de coliformes totais, porém não houve diferença no número encontrado entre as amostras e fábricas. A regressão logística apontou maior razão de chance (OR) de isolamento de coliformes totais nas áreas de dosagem (OR=9,51, IC 95%: 4,43-20,41), moagem (OR=7,10; IC 95%: 3,27-15,40) e em resíduos (OR=6,21; IC 95%: 3,88-9,95). A fábrica C, apesar de ter obtido o segundo melhor escore no roteiro de inspeção, apresentou a maior chance de presença de coliformes totais (OR= 2,43, IC 95%: 1,68-3,53). Não houve associação entre o escore do roteiro de inspeção e a presença de indicadores de higiene em fábricas de ração.UEL2013-12-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/1422410.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6Supl2p3767Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 34 No. 6Supl2 (2013); 3767-3776Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 34 n. 6Supl2 (2013); 3767-37761679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14224/pdf_161Pellegrini, Debora da Cruz PayaoPaim, Daniel dos SantosLima, Gustavo Julio Mello Monteiro deKich, Jalusa DeonColdebella, ArleiCardoso, Marisa Ribeiro de Itapemainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-19T18:36:04Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14224Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-11-19T18:36:04Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills
Inspeção de boas práticas de fabricação e enumeração de coliformes totais em fábricas de ração para suínos
title Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills
spellingShingle Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills
Pellegrini, Debora da Cruz Payao
Feed
Enterobacteriaceae
Good manufacturing practices (GMP)
Contamination levels.
Ração animal
Enterobacteriaceae
Boas práticas de fabricação (BPF)
Níveis de contaminação.
title_short Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills
title_full Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills
title_fullStr Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills
title_full_unstemmed Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills
title_sort Application of a good manufacturing practices checklist and enumeration of total coliform in swine feed mills
author Pellegrini, Debora da Cruz Payao
author_facet Pellegrini, Debora da Cruz Payao
Paim, Daniel dos Santos
Lima, Gustavo Julio Mello Monteiro de
Kich, Jalusa Deon
Coldebella, Arlei
Cardoso, Marisa Ribeiro de Itapema
author_role author
author2 Paim, Daniel dos Santos
Lima, Gustavo Julio Mello Monteiro de
Kich, Jalusa Deon
Coldebella, Arlei
Cardoso, Marisa Ribeiro de Itapema
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pellegrini, Debora da Cruz Payao
Paim, Daniel dos Santos
Lima, Gustavo Julio Mello Monteiro de
Kich, Jalusa Deon
Coldebella, Arlei
Cardoso, Marisa Ribeiro de Itapema
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Feed
Enterobacteriaceae
Good manufacturing practices (GMP)
Contamination levels.
Ração animal
Enterobacteriaceae
Boas práticas de fabricação (BPF)
Níveis de contaminação.
topic Feed
Enterobacteriaceae
Good manufacturing practices (GMP)
Contamination levels.
Ração animal
Enterobacteriaceae
Boas práticas de fabricação (BPF)
Níveis de contaminação.
description A cross-sectional study in four swine feed mills aimed to evaluate the correlation between the score of the inspection checklist defined in the Normative Instruction 4 (IN 4/ Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply), and the enumeration of total coliforms throughout the manufacturing process. The most of non-conformities was found in the physical structure of the feed mills. Feed mill B showed the lowest number of unconformities while units A and D had the largest number of nonconformities. In 38.53% (489/1269) of the samples the presence of total coliform was detected, however no significant difference in the bacterial counts was observed between sampling sites and feed mills. The logistic regression pointed higher odds ratio (OR) for total coliforms isolation at dosing (OR = 9.51, 95% CI: 4.43 to 20.41), grinding (OR = 7.10, 95% CI = 3.27 to 15.40) and residues (OR = 6.21, 95% CI: 3.88 to 9.95) In spite of having the second score in the checklist inspection, feed mill C presented the highest odds for total coliforms isolation (OR= 2,43, IC 95%: 1,68-3,53). The data indicate no association between the score of checklist and the presence of hygienic indicators in feed mills.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14224
10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6Supl2p3767
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14224
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n6Supl2p3767
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/14224/pdf_161
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 34 No. 6Supl2 (2013); 3767-3776
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 34 n. 6Supl2 (2013); 3767-3776
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306069057470464